臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：定位與多重越界：回首重看STS與科哲
書刊名：科技、醫療與社會
作者：傅大為 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fu, Dai-wie
出版日期：2013
卷期：16
頁次：頁49-102
主題關鍵詞：科學哲學；人文社會領域；STS
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:57
  • 點閱點閱:203
David Bloor近來接受訪談，認為「科學哲學」是人文社會領域中抗拒STS最頑固的一個學科。Joseph Rouse最近也發表論文，認為科學哲學與STS過去的關係雖然不好，但未來卻大有可為，值得開闢交易特區（trading zone）來交流。陳瑞麟則認為，過去許多人都誤解了二者的關係，STS本身的理論發展與分化過程，其實哲學是不可或缺的。另外我們知道，十多年前的「科學戰爭」使得STS忙著處理她與科學，乃至科哲的危機關係。雖然在東亞或台灣，科學戰爭的爭議並沒有如此嚴重，但隨著STS的成長，她與科哲的關係，對一個源自科學哲學的STS人──筆者而言，仍感到有許多問題需要研究與發言。本文的書寫策略，除了重新思考STS、科哲二者的定位，還有她們與當代科技的關係之外，筆者使用兩個重要的「越界」例子來思考STS與科哲的關係。一個是技術哲學家Langdon Winner如何批評並且使用STS，另一個則是SSK的領航者David Bloor如何策略性的使用（科學）哲學。本文所欲呈現STS與科哲的關係，不像一般所說的，如雙方合作或共構、交流或溝通、共創理想未來等「跨領域外交」上的常見概念，而要指出另外一種比較單方面的，但也許更具穿透與反省效果的「越界」策略。這可以是單方面地來批評、挪用與徵召STS的策略（如Winner），或者反之（如Bloor），是對科哲進行單方面的分類轉換（如重新界定誰是哲學界中的社會學家）與論點轉換（如哪些科哲其實蘊涵豐富的社會學靈光），從而達成Winner的技術哲學或Bloor的SSK在研究發展上的成果，以及滋生更多跨領域行動中的好策略與好分析。
This paper reconsiders the relationship between STS and philosophy of science. First it tries to understand the relationship by comparing their respective relationships to science. If, as joke has it, philosophy of science to science is just like meteorology to meteors, then what is STS to science like? It turns out that their respective relationships to science are much more complicated and sophisticated. Secondly, instead of going for constructing a safe and diplomatic "trading zone" for exchanging ideas between STS and philosophy of science, this paper suggest some more radical and perhaps more fruitful strategies, whose lessons are to come from two case studies. One is about how a philosopher of technology (Langdon Winner) independently criticizes and appropriates STS, and the other is about how a SSK scholar (David Bloor) skillfully criticizes and appropriates philosophy of science/mathematics. This paper ends with some further dialogue with a Taiwanese philosopher of science (Chen Ruey-Lin) about why philosophy of science is not a necessary condition for the conceptual developments of STS, but sometimes it can do more than simply a necessary condition.
期刊論文
1.陳瑞麟(2009)。孟德爾究竟發現了甚麼？一個實驗發現的典型模型9，123-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bijker, Wiebe(2003)。The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS。Science, Technology, and Human Values，31(4)，443-450。  new window
3.Fu, Daiwie(2012)。Structure and Developments of HPS & STS in Taiwan: A Short Story。East Asian Science, Technology, and Society: An lnternational Journal，6(4)，541-548。  new window
4.Fuller, Steve(199405)。Underlaborers for Science。Science，264，982-983。  new window
5.Hull, David(2000)。The Professionalization of Science Studies: Cutting Some Slack。Biology and Philosophy，15，91。  new window
6.Ihde, Don(2004)。Has the Philosophy of Technology Arrived? A State-of-the-Art Review。Philosophy of Science，71，117-131。  new window
7.Kitcher, Philip(197705)。On the U ses of Rigorous Proof: A Book Review of Proopf and Refutations。Science，196，782-783。  new window
8.Li, Zheng-Feng、Ruey-Chyi Huang、Chih-Tung Huang(2010)。Going Strong or Go Home: An Interview with David Bloor。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journa，14，419-432。new window  new window
9.Levin, Miriam、Rosalind Williams(2003)。Forum on Rethinking Technology in the Aftermath of September 11。History and Technology，19(1)，29-83。  new window
10.Shapin, Steven(1982)。History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions。History of Science，20，157-211。  new window
11.Tumer, R. Steven(1971)。The Growth of Professorial Research in Prussia, 1818 to 1848-Causes and Context。Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences，3，137-182。  new window
12.Winner, Langdon(1993)。Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology。Science Technology & Human Valuesl，8，362-378。  new window
13.Winner, Langdon(2004)。Trust and Terror: the Vulnerability of Complex Socio-Technical Systems。Science as Culture，13(2)，155-172。  new window
14.Yearley, Steven(2009)。Sociology and Climate Change after Kyoto: What Roles for Social Science in Understanding Climate Change?。Current Sociology，57，389-405。  new window
15.傅大為(20081000)。Hacking on Kuhn and Foucault。科技、醫療與社會，7，203-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Chen, Ruey-lin(20110000)。The STS Challenge to Philosophy of Science in Taiwan。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，5(1)，27-48+49-51+53-55。new window  new window
17.陳信行(20020300)。「科學戰爭」中的迷信、騙局、誤解與爭辯：評Gross & Levitt 「高級迷信」與Sokal & Bricmont 「知識的騙局」。臺灣社會研究季刊，45，173-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.傅大為(19980200)。「兩種文化」的迷惑與終結--從Science Studies觀點看「索可事件」與「科學戰爭」。當代，8=126，34-41。  延伸查詢new window
19.Collins, Harry M.、Evans, Robert(2002)。The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience。Social Studies of Science，32(2)，235-296。  new window
20.陳瑞麟(20050300)。科學的戰爭與和平--「科學如何運作」的建構論與實在論之爭。歐美研究，35(1)，141-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bloor, David(1978)。Polyhedra and the Abominations of Leviticus。The British Journal for the History of Science，11(3)，245-272。  new window
22.Rouse, Joseph(20110000)。Philosophy of Science and Science Studies in the West: An Unrecognized Convergence。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，5(1)，11-26。new window  new window
學位論文
1.吳浩然(2006)。大與小的抉擇--從「適當科技」看「風場」(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林孟賢(2009)。全球氣候變遷下的科學風格--以馬爾地夫海水面升降之研究為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bloor, David(1997)。Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Kripke, Saul(1982)。Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Bijker, Wiebe E.、Hughes, Thomas P.(1989)。The Social Construction of Technological Systems。Cambridge：The MIT Press。  new window
4.Bloor, David(1983)。Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge。London：Macmillan。  new window
5.Boyer, Carl B.(1959)。The History of Calculus and Its Conceptual Development。New York：Dover。  new window
6.Collins, Harry(1985)。Changing Order: Replication and lnduction in Scientific Practice。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Fuller, Steve(2000)。Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Kitcher, Philip(1984)。The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Lakatos, Imre(1976)。Proof and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Monahan, Torin(2006)。Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life。New York：Routledge。  new window
11.Nowotny, Helga(2006)。Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation。New York：Berghahn Books。  new window
12.Richards, Joan(1988)。Mathematical Visions: The Pursuit of Geometry in Victorian England。Boston：Academic Press。  new window
13.Stone, Lawrence(1975)。The University in Society: Oxford and Cambridge from the 14th to the Early 19th Century II。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Winner, Langdon(1986)。The Whale and the Reactor。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Zammito, John(2004)。A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
16.MacKenzie, Donald A.(1981)。Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge。Edinburgh：Edinburgh University Press。  new window
17.Collins, Harry(2004)。Gravity's Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Buchwald, Jed Z.(1995)。Scientific Practice: Theories and Stones of Doing Physics。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Achterhuis, Hans、Crease, Robert(2001)。American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn。Bloomington：Indiana University Press。  new window
20.Pickering, Andrew(1992)。Science as Practice and Culture。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.Bloor, David(1991)。Knowledge and Social Imagery。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.陳瑞麟(20040000)。科學理論版本的結構與發展。臺北：國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中國時報(19960701)。懷念孔恩，時報科學版。  延伸查詢new window
2.Quine, Willard Van Orman(1977)。A Review of Proofs and Refutations。  new window
圖書論文
1.傅大為(2006)。STS的實踐，與台灣的新適當科技運動?。回答科學是甚麼的三個答案。台北：群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bijker, Wiebe E.(2006)。The Vulnerability of Technological Culture。Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation。New York：Berghahn Books。  new window
3.Smits, Martijntje(2001)。Langdon Winner: Technology as a Shadow of Constitution。Philosophy of Technology。Bloomington：Indiana University Press。  new window
4.Traweek, Sharon(1992)。Border Crossing: Narrative Strategies in Science Studies and among Physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan。Science as Practice and Culture。  new window
5.Tumer, R. Steven(1975)。University Reformers and Professorial Scholarship in Germany, 1760-1806。The University in Society: Oxford and Cambridge from the 14th to the Early 19th Century II。  new window
6.Winner, Langdon(2006)。Technology Studies for Terrorists: A Short Course。Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1482（臺灣：1478，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67382882
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上