臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The STS Challenge to Philosophy of Science in Taiwan
書刊名：East Asian Science, Technology and Society
作者：Chen, Ruey-lin
出版日期：2011
卷期：5:1
頁次：頁27-48+49-51+53-55
主題關鍵詞：科學哲學；科技與社會；臺灣；孔恩；費耶阿本；Philosophy of science；STS；Taiwan；Thomas Kuhn；Paul Feyerabend
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:73
  • 點閱點閱:43
本文討論台灣的科學哲學傳統和科技與社會研究的傳統，兩者 之間的關係。科技與社會研究在台灣快速崛起，對於相對少數的科學哲學構成一個挑戰；一些研究者認為某種哲學辯論對於理解科技與社會無所助益、質疑它們脫離社會現實。筆者認為，科技與社會的哲學辯論是一種特別的科學哲學，因此這種質疑標誌了對科學哲學必要性的一般懷疑。本文爭論，科學哲學可以對科技與社會研究的發展提供有用的模型；反過來說，它也能受益於對方，只要科學哲學家能認真地回應科技與社會研究的挑戰。本文提出幾個回應的策略，並建議科學哲學在科技與社會研究的發展中，扮演關鍵的角色。可是，這個建議引發一個質疑：科學哲學家會比技術哲學家更適合和科技與社會研究者對話嗎？
This article discusses the relation between the tradition of the philosophy of science and the tradition of science, technology, and society (STS) studies in Taiwan. The swiftly rising popularity of STS studies has issued a challenge to philosophy of science, whose practitioners have amounted to a relatively small community. The STS challenge is measurable in the increase in the number of scholars who have lost interest in philosophical debates. They doubted that these sorts of debates were far from the reality of science, technology, and society. Since philosophical debate within STS studies is a form peculiar to philosophy of science, this lack of interest can be read as symptomatic of a general skepticism on the necessity of philosophy of science. This paper argues that philosophy of science can provide useful models for the development of STS studies in Taiwan. Furthermore, philosophy of science can benefit from the rise of STS studies, so long as philosophers respond to the challenge. This paper sets out several strategies for such responses, and suggests that the philosophy of science should play a crucial role. This suggestion raises the question of whether philosophers of science are more suitable interlocutors to the scholars of STS studies than are philosophers of technology.
期刊論文
1.陳瑞麟(20081000)。On Hacking's Experimental Realism。科技、醫療與社會，7，241-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hacking, Ian(20081000)。Comments and Replies。科技、醫療與社會，7，265-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊文瑞(1994)。科學哲學專輯。當代，10，12-53。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳瑞麟(20040600)。Testing through Realizable Models。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，27，67-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.傅大為(20081000)。Hacking on Kuhn and Foucault。科技、醫療與社會，7，203-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王榮麟、陳思廷(20081000)。On Hacking's Approach to Styles of Scientific Thinking。科技、醫療與社會，7，253-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳信行(2002)。科學戰爭中的迷信、騙局、誤解與爭辯。台灣社會研究季刊，45，173-207。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fu, Daiwei(19921000)。On the Competitive Structure of Problem-Solving。Philosophy and The History of Science，1(1)，59-110。  new window
9.苑舉正(2003)。自然化的科學哲學專輯。當代，186，10-61。  延伸查詢new window
10.Chao, Hsiang-Ke(2007)。A Structure of the Consumption Function。Journal of Economic Methodology，14(2)，227-248。  new window
11.Chen, Ruey-Lin(2000)。Theory Versions Instead of Articulations of a Paradigm。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A，31(3)，449-471。  new window
12.Jardine, N.、Frasca-Spada, M.(1997)。Splendours and miseries of the science wars。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences，28，219-235。  new window
13.陳瑞麟(20050300)。科學的戰爭與和平--「科學如何運作」的建構論與實在論之爭。歐美研究，35(1)，141-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.雷祥麟(20020300)。劇變中的科技、民主與社會：STS(科技與社會研究)的挑戰。臺灣社會研究，45，123-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Li, Zheng-feng、Hwang, Ruey-chyi、Huang,Chih-tung(20100000)。Go Strong or Go Home: An Interview with David Bloor。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，4(3)，419-432。new window  new window
16.Rouse, Joseph(20110000)。Philosophy of Science and Science Studies in the West: An Unrecognized Convergence。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，5(1)，11-26。new window  new window
17.Bloor, David(1999)。Anti-Latour。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A，30(1)，81-112。  new window
18.陳思廷(2009)。游走於理論與實情之間。科技、醫療與社會，9，57-122。  延伸查詢new window
19.(20020300)。[臺灣社會研究季刊]編輯室報告。臺灣社會研究季刊，45，iii-xiii。  延伸查詢new window
20.Fu, Daiwie(1995)。Higher Taxonomy and Higher Incommensurability。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science，26，273-294。  new window
21.Latour, Bruno(1999)。Discussion: For David Bloor ... and beyond: Areply to David Bloor's “Anti-Latour”。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science，30A，113-129。  new window
會議論文
1.Sokal, Alan、Bricmont, Jean(2001)。Defense of a modest scientific realism。  new window
圖書
1.Barnes, Barry、Bloor, David、Henry, John(1996)。Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Oudshoorn, Nelly、Pinch, Trevor(2003)。How Users Matter: The Co-production of Users and Technology。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
3.Kuhn, Thomas S.(2000)。The road since structure。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Collins, Harry(2004)。Gravity's Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Shapin,S.、Schaffer, S.(1986)。Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Hacking, Ian(2002)。Historical ontology。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Giere, Ronald N.(1999)。Science without laws。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Brown, James Robert(1984)。Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn。Dordrecht：D. Reidel Publishing Company。  new window
9.Chao, Hsiang-Ke(2009)。Representation and Structure in Economics。London：Routledge Press。  new window
10.Giere, Ronald N.(1988)。Explaining Science。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Kukla, André(2000)。Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science。London：Routledge。  new window
12.Giere, Ronald N.(2006)。Scientific Perspectivism。University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Brown, J. R.(2001)。Who rules in science?。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
14.陳瑞麟(2003)。科學與世界之間：科學哲學論文集。臺北：學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.Koertge, Noretta(1998)。A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science。A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Nickles, Thomas(2003)。Thomas Kuhn。Thomas Kuhn。Cambridge, UK/ New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Gross, Paul R.、Levitt, Norman、Lewis, Martin W.(1996)。The Flight from Science and Reason。The Flight from Science and Reason。New York, NY：New York Academy of Sciences。  new window
18.Bloor, David(1976)。Knowledge and Social Imagery。London：Chicago：Routledge and Kegan Paul：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Rouse, Joseph(1987)。Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science。Cornell University Press。  new window
20.Feyerabend, Paul(1978)。Science in a free society。Lowe & Brydone Ltd.。  new window
21.Cartwright, Nancy(1989)。Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement。Oxford University Press。  new window
22.林正弘(1988)。伽利略、波柏、科學說明。臺北：東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Hacking, Ian(1999)。The Social Construction of What?。Harvard University Press。  new window
24.Latour, Bruno、Woolgar, Steve、Salk, Jonas(1986)。Laboratory life: The Construction of Scientific Facts。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
25.Lakatos, Imre、Musgrave, Alan(1970)。Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge。Cambridge University Press。  new window
26.Heidegger, Martin(1986)。Sein und Zeit。Max Niemeyer Verlag。  new window
27.林正弘(1985)。知識．邏輯．科學哲學。台北：東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳瑞麟(20040000)。科學理論版本的結構與發展。臺北：國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.朱元鴻、傅大為(2001)。孔恩：評論集。巨流圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
30.Hacking, Ian(1983)。Representing and Intervening Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
31.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
32.Brown, J. R.(1987)。The rational and the social。London。  new window
33.Cartwright, Nancy(1996)。The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science。Cambridge。  new window
34.Latour, Bruno(1994)。Science in action。Cambridge, MA。  new window
35.Labinger, Jay A.、Collins, Harry(2001)。The one culture? conversation about science。Chicago。  new window
36.Nola, Robert(1988)。Relativism and realism in science。Dordrecht。  new window
37.Lin, Cheng-Hung、Fu, Daiwie(1993)。Philosophy and conceptual history of science in Taiwan。Dordrecht。  new window
38.Mi, C.-K.、Chen, R.-L.(2007)。Naturalized epistemology and philosophy of science。Amsterdam。  new window
39.Pickering, Andrew(1984)。Constructing quark: A sociological history of practice physics。Edinburgh。  new window
40.Rouse, Joseph(2002)。How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism。Chicago。  new window
41.Chen, R.-L.(2007)。The structure of experimentation and the replication degree: Reconsidering the replication of Hertz's cathode ray experiment。Naturalizing epistemology and philosophy of science。Amsterdam。  new window
42.Callon, Michel、Latour, Bruno(1992)。Don't throw the baby out with the Bath school!。Science as practice and culture。Chicago。  new window
43.Kuhn, Thomas S.(1970)。Logic of discoveries or psychology of researches?。Criticism and the growth of knowledge。Cambridge。  new window
44.Lynch, Michael(2001)。Is a Science Peace Process Necessary?。The one culture? A conversation about science。Chicago。  new window
45.Lynch, Michael(2001)。Causality, Grammar, and Working Philosophies: Some Final Comments。The one culture? A conversation about science。Chicago。  new window
46.Sokal, Alan、Bricmont, Jean(2001)。Science and Sociology of Science: Beyond War and Peace. In The one culture?。A conversation about science。Chicago。  new window
47.Feyerabend, Paul(1970)。Consolations for the specialists。Criticism and the growth of knowledge。Cambridge。  new window
48.Weinberg, Steven(2001)。Peace at last?。The one culture? A conversation about science。Chicago。  new window
49.Yuann, Jeu-Jenq(2007)。A naturalistic approach of scientific methodology: A comparative study of Otto Neurath and Paul Feyerabend。Naturalized epistemology and philosophy of science。Amsterdam。  new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, H, M.、Yearley, S.(1992)。Epistemological Chicken。Science as Practice and Culture。London。  new window
2.Callon, Michel(1995)。Four Models for the Dynamics of Science。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。London：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1254（臺灣：1244，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67355321
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上