This research aims to propose an alternative perspective about physical fitness tests (PFTs) through an inter-disciplinary approach, and then suggest possible ways to resist relations of domination. First, using a children’s philosophy framework, I engaged in discussions with the 6th-grade students in my courses on health and physical education. After the discussions, and taking into account a need for gender balance and normal distribution of fitness levels, I chose ten of the students as key informants. In addition, I attended PFT training courses, and conducted fieldwork at two elementary schools to collect research data relating to the question of how PFTs dominate our bodies. The research results were as follows: 1. The variety of mechanisms that have been practiced in PFTs at school included flexibility training, ways to make one’s own body visible, a score logging system, a standard model to normalize judgments, and an evaluation system for the award of prizes. 2. The effects of PFTs in disciplining students’ bodies are not absolute, because students as subjects tend to transform and resist the power of discipline. 3. If we take the progress of physical fitness as a way of constructing the relationship between the body and the self, then it should be conducted by oneself rather than others. This research also proposes that PFT skills should be improved in order to protect the privacy of students.