:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:韓元震哲學與人物性異論
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:林明熙
作者(外文):Lim, Myung-hee
出版日期:2014
卷期:41:8=483
頁次:頁81-97
主題關鍵詞:韓元震人物性異論性三層說五常氣質虛靈Han Won-jinInmulsŏngdongironTheory of whether human nature and things nature are same or differentSŏngsamch'ŭngsŏlTheory explaining human nature in three different viewpointsOsangFive virtuesKijilTemperHŏryŏngEssence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:57
  • 點閱點閱:13
本文以南塘韓元震的性論和心論為中心,分析了人物性異論的理論結構及其意義。在性論當中,韓元震提出「性三層說」,論證了人物性異論的妥當性。韓元震認為,在「超形氣」的層面上,人物相同;在「因氣質」的層面上,人人相同而人物相異。在心論當中,韓元震將「心」分為「虛靈」和「氣稟」主張聖人和凡人的區別不在於「心之虛靈」而在於「心之氣稟」之上。因此,韓元震強調改善氣質工夫的優先性,提出若通過變化「心之氣質」而恢復「心之虛靈」則心就能夠引導血氣和形質通往正確的方向。總而言之,韓元震從性論和心論這兩方面闡述了人之所以與物不同的原因。首先,從性論而言,只有人才真實地稟受了「五常」,並以仁義禮智為性。其次,從心論上來看,只有人才能夠克服天生氣質的限制,以完成道德人格。
This paper is to deliberate the structure and meaning of Han Won-jin's theory on the difference of nature between human being and other living things centered in theory of human nature and theory of human mind. In theory of human nature, Han Won-jin raised "Sŏngsamch 'ŭngsŏl" and protested the difference of nature between human being and other living things. Han Won-jin viewed that human nature and things nature are same "beyond figures and energies" but different "in terms of physical constraints". According to Han Won-jin, only human being is born with entire "Kijil" (temper) and takes Osang as his/her nature. Next, in theory of human mind, Han Won-jin explained mind in the two levels such as "Horyong" (essence) and "Kijil" (temper). According to Han Won-jin, in terms of "Horyong" of mind, saint and ordinary person have same mind but in terms of "Kijil" of mind, they are different. However, the "Kijil" of mind can be overcome by training. Through training to change one's own "Kijil", anyone can reach to saint's level. Consequently, Han Won-jin demonstrated human nature and things nature in the following two levels. First, only human being has entire "Osang". Second, only human being can change his/her innate "Kijil" (temper).
期刊論文
1.李愛熙(2002)。韓元震之人物性論。韓國思想史學,19,283-305。  延伸查詢new window
2.崔英辰(2003)。關於胡洛論爭的研究成果的分析與展望。儒教思想研究,19,13-36。  延伸查詢new window
3.邢麗菊(2008)。南塘韓元震人物性異論研究。東洋哲學研究,56,97-128。  延伸查詢new window
4.邢麗菊(2011)。朝鮮儒者南塘的人物性異論及對朱熹理論的新發展。社會科學戰線,2011(1),23-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.安載皓(2013)。南塘韓元震的「氣質」心性論批判。韓國哲學論集,37,71-96。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lee, Dae-Hee(2008)。朝鮮後期人物性同異論辯之跨學科研究。哲學論叢,54。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.楊祖漢(2008)。從當代儒學觀點看韓國儒學的重要論爭。上海:華東師範大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李珥(1996)。栗谷先生全書。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
3.韓元震(1998)。南塘先生文集。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
4.李柬(1997)。巍巖遺稿。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
5.崔英辰(2013)。韓國哲學史。首爾:新文社(새문사)。  延伸查詢new window
6.이상익(1998)。畿湖性理學研究。한울아카데미。  延伸查詢new window
7.任元彬(1994)。南塘韓元震的人物性異論。人性物性論。首爾:一路社(한길사)。  延伸查詢new window
8.文錫胤(2006)。湖洛論爭形成與展開。首爾:東與西。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱熹(2002)。四書章句集註。臺北:鵝湖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.黎靖德、朱傑人、鄭明(2002)。朱子語類。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE