:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從沈璟的懷舊意識,到晚明吳江派的集體記憶
書刊名:臺北城市科技大學通識學報
作者:許懷之
作者(外文):Hsu, Huai-chih
出版日期:2014
卷期:3
頁次:頁31-53
主題關鍵詞:沈璟吳江派懷舊復古集體記憶Shen ChingWujiang SchoolNostalgiaRetroCollective memory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:20
提起明中葉的戲曲家,湯顯祖與沈璟是兩名非常重要的人物。沈璟改《牡丹亭》詞律為《同夢記》,締造晚明劇壇重要論戰「湯沈之爭」。主要是兩人的價值觀大相逕庭;沈璟原來在製曲中尋求療癒宦途失意的出口,卻遭逢傳奇創作的變更時期,在守舊與革新之間,他選擇懷念過去的美好,尊崇「宋元舊範」,甚而積極地編纂、增定《南九宮曲譜》,也是將承自何良俊的「本色」重新包裝,創造出更適合他心中的標準「傳統」;這一連串的復古行徑,是他尋求自我尊嚴的一種「懷舊」情感。唯湯顯祖亦崇古,認為「上古」之樂是應運時勢化而生,「聲律之道,在於天然而不造作」,對於沈璟強調的規範大大不以為然。可知兩人的懷舊方式,源自於截然不同的的體驗。也因此建構出「吳江派」與「臨川派」的論爭。沈璟是晚明吳江文人公認的「曲壇盟主」,他提出「恪守聲律」、「崇尚本色」、「提倡場上之曲」等曲學理論,成為了吳江文人相同文化背景上的共通點;吳江文人的集體,在一齊推動度曲理論之共同經驗中,「吳江派」也擁有了如沈璟一般,對崑曲曲律「中興之功,功不可沒」的集體記憶。
Regarding the middle era of the Ming Dynasty, the most important opera were Tang Xianzu and Shen Ching. Shen Ching changed the "Peony Pavilion" rhythm to Tung Meng Chi (the story of the same dream), which created an important debate in the opera forum late Ming theater world, which was called the "Tang-Shen dispute." The perspectives of these two were completely different. Shen Ching wanted to find a way to cure his career failure in opera writing; however, at that time, it was a transitional era between conservative and innovative of Ming writing about legends. He chose to remember the beauty of the past and follow the "old Song Dynasty and Yuan Dynasty norms." He even aggressively edited and re-writing the South Jiu Gong Tu scores." This followed Ho Liang-chuing's original nature with innovations, in order to create a standard tradition to fit his own mind. These series of actions returning to the traditional was a way to find his own dignity and nostalgic feelings; however, Tang Xianzu also followed the classical style, since he thought traditional music was produced to follow the times. "The rule of the melody shoul dbe based on nature, not artificial." Tang absolutely disagreed with Shen Ching’s theory; therefore, we know that the method of remembering the ancient times by these two people comes from very different experience. Therefore, the debate between the t a "Wujiang School" and "Linchuan School" began. Shen Ching was considered the "leader of the melody" by the scholars of the Wujiang School in the late Ming Dynasty. Shen Ching advocated the theory of music, as follows: "strictly follow the melody," "promote nature," and "advocate music on the stage." His music theories became the common cultural background of the Wujiang scholars. Through their common experience, the Wujiang scholars worked together to promote this music theory. Therefore, promoting Kun opera melody is as much the achievement of "Wujiang scholars" as Shen Ching.
期刊論文
1.周維培(199411)。沈璟曲譜及其裔派創作。文學遺產,1994(4)。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾光華、陳貞吟、張永富(20041200)。以方法目的鏈探討旅客懷舊體驗的內涵與價值。戶外遊憩研究,17(4),43-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.高文彥(2005)。晚明劇曲家流派研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯香君(2007)。明代戲曲發展之群體現象研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉召明(200604)。晚明蘇州劇壇研究(博士論文)。華東師範大學,上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.李冠然(2011)。沈璟《南曲全譜》研究(碩士論文)。河北師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.盧柏勳(2013)。晚明蘇州曲家交遊研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.沈自晉、王秋桂(1984)。南詞新譜。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.周貽白(2007)。中國戲曲史長編。上海:上海世紀出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陸萼庭(2006)。崑劇演出史稿。上海:上海教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐復祚(195910)。曲論。北京:中國戲曲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞為民、孫蓉蓉(200903)。歷代曲話彙編.明代篇。合肥:黃山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.俞為民(199307)。明清戲曲考論。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄧長風(199412)。明清戲曲家考略。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳煒、劉強、顧聆森(200512)。沈璟與崑曲吳江派。上海:上海文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.盧前(1994)。明清戲曲史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫玄齡(1988)。元散曲的音樂。北京:文化藝術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.武俊達(1993)。崑曲唱腔研究。人民音樂出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.孫楷第(195311)。也是園古今雜劇考。上海:上雜出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.羅麗容(200208)。清人戲曲序跋研究。臺北:里仁。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.廖奔(199705)。中國古代劇場史‧堂會演戲。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
15.洪惟助(2002)。崑曲辭典。宜蘭縣:國立傳統藝術中心。  延伸查詢new window
16.沈璟、徐朔方(1991)。沈璟集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.徐朔方(1993)。湯顯祖評傳。南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.王驥德(1959)。曲律。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.沈璟(1984)。增定南九宮曲譜。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.洪惟助(2010)。崑曲宮調與曲牌。臺北:國家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.廖奔、劉彥君(2003)。中國戲曲發展史。太原:山西教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.李玫(2000)。明清之際蘇州作家群研究。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.葉長海(1993)。曲律與曲學。台北:學海。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.徐復祚(2002)。南北詞廣韻選。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.葉長海(1987)。中國戲劇學史稿。駱駝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.金寧芬(2007)。明代戲曲史。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.徐朔方(1993)。晚明曲家年譜。浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.蔡毅(1989)。中國古典戲曲序跋彙編。齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
29.呂天成(1959)。曲品。中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.Halbwachs, Maurice、畢然、郭金華(2002)。論集體記憶。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.廖炳惠(2003)。關鍵詞200:文學與批評研究的通用辭彙編。麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.胡忌、劉致中(1989)。崑劇發展史。中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
33.楊蔭瀏(1997)。中國古代音樂史稿。大鴻。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE