:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歷史解釋法的強制與疏離
書刊名:檢察新論
作者:賴英照 引用關係
出版日期:2017
卷期:21
頁次:頁158-173
主題關鍵詞:大法官釋憲憲法解釋歷史解釋法
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:508
  • 點閱點閱:41
期刊論文
1.Breyer, Stephen(1992)。On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes。Southern California Law Review,65,845-874。  new window
2.Nelson, Caleb(2005)。What is Textualism?。Virginia Law Review,91,347-418。  new window
3.楊日然(19740400)。美國實用主義法學的哲學基礎及其檢討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,3(2),245-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Merrill, Thomas W.(1994)。Textualism and the Future of the Chevron Doctrine。Washington University Law Quarterly,72,351-376。  new window
5.Manning, John F.(1997)。Textualism As A Nondelegation Doctrine。Columbia Law Review,97(3),673-739。  new window
6.Henschen, Beth M.(1985)。Judicial Use of Legislative History and Intent in Statutory Interpretation。Legislative Studies Quarterly,10,353-371。  new window
7.Brudney, James J.、Ditslear, Corey(2006)。The Decline and Fall of Legislative History? Patterns of Supreme Court Reliance in the Burger and Rehnquist Eras。JUDICATURE,89,220。  new window
8.Wald, Patricia M.(1990)。The Sizzling Sleeper: The Use of Legislative History in Construing Statutes in the 1988-89 Term of the United States Supreme Court。American University L. Rev.,39,277。  new window
9.Smith, Peter(2008)。Textualism and Jurisdiction。Columbia L. Rev.,108,1833。  new window
10.Law, David、Zaring, David(2010)。Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History。William & Mary L. Rev.,51,1653-1747。  new window
11.Landis, James M.(1930)。A Note on "Statutory Interpretation"。Harvard Law Review,43(6),886-893。  new window
12.Martin, Aaron D.(1995)。Liberty Finds No Refuge in a Jurisprudence of Doubt: The Unconstitutional Use of Legislative History in Construing Pennsylvania Statutes。Dickinson L. Rev.,99,1043+1055。  new window
13.Turner, Elizabeth Bulat(2006)。The Relevancy of Foreign Law Persuasive Authority and Congress's Response to its Use: A Preemptive Attack on the Constitution Restoration Act。Georgia State University L. Rev.,23,455+474-479。  new window
14.Brudney, James J.(1994)。Congressional Commentary on Judicial Interpretations of Statutes: Idle Chatter or Telling Response?。Michigan L. Rev.,93,1-106。  new window
15.Eskridge, William(2006)。No Frills Textualism。Harvard L. Rev.,119,2041-2075。  new window
16.楊日然(19761200)。美國實用主義法學的哲學基礎及其檢討(2):Oliver W. Holmes, Jr.的法律思想。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,6(1),3-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Scalia, Antonin(1989)。Originalism: The Lesser Evil。The University of Cincinnati Law Review,57,849-865。  new window
會議論文
1.Boston University, School of Law(2012)。Originalism and Living Constitutionalism: A Symposium on Jack Balkin's Living Originalism and David Strauss's the Living Constitution。Boston University, School of Law。  new window
圖書
1.Breyer, Stephen(2005)。Active Liberty。NY。  new window
2.Posner, Richard A.(2003)。Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy。Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Cross, Frank B.(2009)。The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation。Stanford University Press。  new window
4.司法院(2009)。司法院大法官解釋。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃維幸(2008)。務實主義的憲法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃茂榮(2011)。法學方法與現代民法。臺北:黃茂榮。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.楊仁壽(2010)。法學方法論。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳庚(2004)。憲法的解釋與適用。吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
9.Greenawalt, Kent(2012)。Statutory and Common Law Interpretation。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Katzmann, Robert A.(2014)。Judging Statutes。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(1994)。Dynamic Statutory Interpretation。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.司法院(2000)。司法院大法官解釋。  延伸查詢new window
13.李惠宗(20090000)。案例式法學方法論。臺北:新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Scalia, Antonin、Gutmann, Amy(1997)。A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and The Law。Princeton University Press。  new window
15.Strauss, David A.(2010)。The Living Constitution。Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.薩孟武(1994)。憲法的解釋。孟武隨筆。三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.Resnik, Judith(2015)。Constructing the 'Foreign': American Law's Relationship to Non-Domestic Sources。COURTS AND COMPARATIVE LAW。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE