:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:產品設計教學中視覺化設計概要關鍵因素之研究
書刊名:設計學研究
作者:姜超周永燦
作者(外文):Jiang, ChaoJou, Yung-tsan
出版日期:2017
卷期:20:1
頁次:頁23-43
主題關鍵詞:設計教育設計思考設計概要資訊視覺化DANPDesign educationDesign briefDesign thinkingInformation visualization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:7
設計教育的職責是促成學生設計意識形成,將具有廣泛聯繫性的思考,結合資訊記錄、分析、溝通的視覺化呈現,內化成學生個人特質。基於産品設計的系統性認知特點,設計工作可看做圍繞議題各方知識的框架規劃和基於框架的構思創造兩個主要階段,上述框架亦是設計概要的基本內容。新産品開發立足項目整體性和跨學科合作的觀點,對工業設計行業實務與教學都産生廣泛影響。傳統以實務演練爲內容的項目教學方式,礙於教學組織模式限制,與産品設計行業跨領域知識體系及教學中塑造學生專業意識的要求,都有一定落差。本研究通過文獻,探討了視覺化設計概要在教學中促進學生構思的可行性;運用德爾菲法(Delphi Method)和DANP(DEMATEL based ANP)法,規劃獲得視覺化產品設計概要關鍵因素之路徑。以家用攪拌器爲例,研究獲得操作交互、形態特徵、布局結構、人機工程、語義符號這五項,是該產品視覺化設計概要的關鍵因素,幷建構了關鍵因素間網路框架圖。以框架圖爲基礎,以便學生收集幷整理議題相關各領域知識,繪製家用攪拌器的視覺化設計概要,作爲設計發想的圖面依據,以助當前設計教學思維養成之目標。
The duty of design education is to facilitate students' design consciousness, which helps students to develop the individual traits in thinking model featuring extensive connections, and the skill to deal with information in visual way, including record, analysis and communication. In view of the systematic characteristics, product design can be regarded as two phases roughly, framework planning and creation base on the framework, which is also the basic content of the design brief. For the designers, the design brief with function of inspiration would be performed as the starting point and the basis of thinking. In the standpoint of project integrality and interdisciplinary cooperation derived from the new product development exerts a ranging influence on industrial design practice and education. Regular classroom education of product design simulate practice in industry simply, which cannot satisfy the requirement of the interdisciplinary thinking in practice, and cannot gain the aim of cultivating students' design consciousness neither. In this paper, we explore the feasibility to promote student thinking by visual design brief through literature upon the combination with students' knowledge structure and image cognition; use the Delphi method and DANP to probe the key factors of visualized product design brief. We take the design of household blenders as the example, find the five key factors of visualized product design brief, which are operation interaction, modality characteristics, layout structure, ergonomics and semantic symbol. Based on the network diagram of key factors, we organize the visualized design brief and help the students to gather and sort interdisciplinary knowledge of the design subject. The visualized design brief is also the imagery basis for students' design ideation.
期刊論文
1.Kleinsmann, M.、Valkenburg, R.(2008)。Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects。Design Studies,29(4),369-386。  new window
2.Ryd, N.(2004)。The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process。Design Studies,25(3),231-249。  new window
3.Oxman, R.(2004)。Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education。Design Studies,25(1),63-91。  new window
4.Cross, N.(2004)。Expertise in design: An overview。Design Studies,25(5),427-441。  new window
5.Larkin, J. H.、Simon, H. A.(1987)。Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words。Cognitive Science,11(1),65-100。  new window
6.游萬來、楊敏英、羅士孟(20140300)。臺灣初任工業設計師的工作與適應情形研究。設計學報,19(1),43-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lee, Y.(2008)。Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process。CoDesign,4(1),31-50。  new window
8.Leenders, R. T. A. J.、Van Engelen, J. M. L.、Kratzer, J.(2003)。Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective。Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,20(1/2),69-92。  new window
9.Goldschmidt, G.(2007)。To see eye to eye: The role of visual representations in building shared mental models in design teams。CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts,3(1),43-50。  new window
10.許子凡、楊朝明(20150700)。網頁資訊圖像的表現形式與主題內容之關聯分析。設計學研究,18(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hu, Y. C.、Chiu, Y. J.、Hsu, C. S.、Chang, Y. Y.(2015)。Identifying Key Factors for Introducing GPS-Based Fleet Management Systems to the Logistics Industry。Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2015,(413203)1-(413203)14。  new window
12.Cardoso, C.、Badke-Schaub, P.(2011)。The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation。The Journal of Creative Behavior,45(2),130-146。  new window
13.Dorst, Kees(2011)。The core of 'design thinking' and its application。Design Studies,32(6),521-532。  new window
14.Adams, R. S.、Daly, S. R.、Mann, L. M.、Dall'Alba, G.(2011)。Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being。Design Studies,32(6),588-607。  new window
15.Atilola, O.、Tomko, M.、Linsey, J. S.(2016)。The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees。Design Studies,42,110-136。  new window
16.Cartmell, M. P.(1995)。Design brief expansion: Process validation issues。Journal of Engineering Design,6(1),17-29。  new window
17.Barrett, P. S.、Hudson, J.、Stanley, C.(1999)。Good practice in briefing: The limits of rationality。Automation in Construction,8(6),633-642。  new window
18.Crilly, N.(2015)。Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers。Design Studies,38,54-91。  new window
19.Cash, P.、Hicks, B.、Culley, S.(2015)。Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice。Design Studies,38,1-32。  new window
20.Eder, W. E.(2011)。Engineering design science and theory of technical systems: Legacy of Vladimir Hubka。Journal of Engineering Design,22(5),361-385。  new window
21.Goatman, M.、Moody, L.(2014)。The changing nature and definitions of industrial design and implications for prospective undergraduate students。Design & Technology Education,19(1),21-29。  new window
22.Haines-Gadd, M.、Hasegawa, A.、Hooper, R.、Huck, Q.、Pabian, M.、Portillo, C.、Zheng, L.、Williams, L.、McBride, A.(2015)。Cut the crap; design brief to pre-production in eight weeks: Rapid development of an urban emergency low-tech toilet for Oxfam。Design Studies,40,246-268。  new window
23.Kamara, J. M.、Anumba, C. J.、Evbuomwan, N. F. O.(2001)。Assessing the suitability of current briefing practices in construction within a concurrent engineering framework。International Journal of Project Management,19(6),337-351。  new window
24.Kim, E.、Kim, K.(2015)。Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps。Design Studies,40,1-38。  new window
25.Oxman, R.(1999)。Educating the designerly thinker。Design Studies,20(2),105-122。  new window
26.Linsey, J. S.、Clauss, E. F.、Kurtoglu, T.、Murphy, J. T.、Wood, K. L.、Markman, A. B.(2011)。An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: Understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods。Journal of Mechanical Design,133(3)。  new window
27.Paton, B.、Dorst, K.(2011)。Briefing and reframing: A situated practice。Design Studies,32(6),573-587。  new window
28.Pei, E.、Campbell, I.、Evans, M.(2011)。A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers。The Design Journal,14(1),64-91。  new window
29.Stechert, C.、Franke, H. J.(2009)。Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development。CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,1(3),153-158。  new window
30.Truchon, M.(2008)。Borda and the maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation。Mathematical Social Sciences,55(1),96-102。  new window
31.Wiltschnig, S.、Christensen, B. T.、Ball, L. J.(2013)。Collaborative problem-solution co-evolution in creative design。Design Studies,34(5),515-542。  new window
32.Wormald, P.(2011)。Positioning industrial design students to operate at the 'fuzzy front end': Investigating a new arena of university design education。International Journal of Technology & Design Education,21(4),425-447。  new window
33.Yang, M. C.(2009)。Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design。Research in Engineering Design,20(1),1-11。  new window
34.Yilmaz, S.、Seifert, C. M.(2011)。Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design。Design Studies,32(4),384-415。  new window
35.Yu, A. T. W.、Qiping, S.、Kelly, J.、Hunter, K.(2008)。Comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/architectural programming。Journal of Construction Engineering & Management,134(2),122-138。  new window
36.鄭永熏(2014)。意識型態概念對師生互動之影響:工業設計教育知識內涵之批判與建構。設計學研究,17(2),67-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.劉征、孫守遷(2009)。面向產品外觀設計的知識管理系統。計算機輔助設計與圖形學學報,21(3),376-381。  延伸查詢new window
38.Ou Yang, Yu-ping、Shieh, How-ming、Leu, Jun-der、Tzeng, Gwo-hshiung(20080900)。A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications。International Journal of Operations Research,5(3),160-168。new window  new window
39.Dorst, Kees、Cross, Nigel(2001)。Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution。Design Studies,22(5),425-437。  new window
40.曾榮梅(20081200)。「視覺化」與當代設計思維。設計學研究,11(2),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Wu, Wei-Wen(2008)。Choosing Knowledge Management Strategies by Using a Combined ANP and DEMATEL Approach。Expert Systems with Applications,35(3),828-835。  new window
42.Xu, Zeshui、Wei, Cuiping(1999)。A Consistency Improving Method in the Analytic Hierarchy Process。European Journal of Operational Research,116(2),443-449。  new window
43.Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung、Chiang, Cheng-Hsin、Li, Chung-wei(2007)。Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL。Expert Systems with Applications,32(4),1028-1044。  new window
44.楊敏英、游萬來、郭純妤(20100600)。臺灣工業設計畢業生就業情形之初探。設計學報,15(2),73-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄧振源(2012)。多準則決策分析:方法與應用。鼎茂。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧永毅、羅小未(1997)。工業設計史。臺北市:田園城市文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cross, Nigel(2011)。Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work。Berg Publishers。  new window
4.Karmiloff-Smith, A.(1995)。Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science。Boston:A Bradford Book。  new window
5.Pahl, G.、Wallace, K.、Blessing, L. T. M.、Beitz, W.、Bauert, F.(2013)。Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach。London:Springer London。  new window
6.Ulrich, K. T.(2003)。Product Design and Development。Boston:Tata McGraw-Hill Education。  new window
7.Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung、Huang, Jih-Jeng(2011)。Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications。CRC Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE