:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民主政治下的公共哲學:Michael J. Sandel的透析
書刊名:正修通識教育學報
作者:韓台武
作者(外文):Han, Tai Wu
出版日期:2017
卷期:14
頁次:頁149-170
主題關鍵詞:美國政治思想民主不滿公共哲學程序共和American political thoughtDemocracy's discontentPublic philosophyProcedural republic
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:175
  • 點閱點閱:29
本論文旨在透過一條道德與政治的途徑,來闡釋當代社群主義思想家Michael J. Sandel的政治哲學。根據John Rawls所言,建立在政治領域中的憲政秩序必須超然獨立於社會文化的各種不同傳統之外。Sandel以哲學人類學為思維進路,認為人類的本質是變動的,並透過不斷的認知與反思,進而發現了自我之界線。Sandel也指出,憲政主義格局下的程序自由主義已經在美國觸發了民主的不滿。當代自由主義的理論與實踐已經變成一種程序共和制,主要特徵不僅是權利至上與中立國家,也包含社群的腐敗與自治能力的喪失,因此,重塑民主的道德生活成為當下矯治的契機。Sandel共和思想希望以政治社群即國家來培養公民的德性、共同目標以及實質道德內涵的民主精神。
The purpose of this thesis is to explore contemporary communitarian thinker Michael J. Sandel's political philosophy concerning one that realizes the importance of "moral" and "politics". According to John Rawls, the constitutional order established in the political domain must be independent from different traditions of social culture. Sandel thinks by a way of philosophical anthropology. By constantly cognizing and reflecting, Sandel discovery the demarcation line of self. Sandel has argued that constitutional, procedural liberalism has arouse "democracy's discontent" in the state. Sandel's argument and point out the fact that the theory and practice of contemporary liberalism has practically become a synonym to procedural republic. It is presented not only the ideas of "rights as trumps" and neutral state, but also revealed by the erosion of community and the loss of self-government. Therefore, how to rebuild moral life in modem democratic practices has become an important task for people of our time. Sandelian republicanism stresses the importance of political community as a whole to cultivate civic virtue, common ends and substantial moral contents in political life.
期刊論文
1.曾國祥(20030900)。論沈岱爾之行動性理論:一個哲學保守主義的重塑。政治與社會哲學評論,6,65-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳正堂(20040700)。正當(right)與善(good)的優先性:評羅爾斯(J. Rawls)和沈岱爾(M. J. Sandel)的論辯。哲學論集,37,241-265+357-358。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曾國祥(20040300)。自由主義與政治的侷限。政治與社會哲學評論,8,79-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.曾國祥(20041200)。憲政主義與民主的衝突:美國政治思想的一個側面。政治與社會哲學評論,11,35-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Arblaster, Anthony、曹海軍(2004)。西方自由主義的興衰。長春:吉林人民。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sandel, Michael J.(1998)。Liberalism and the Limits of Justice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Taylor, Charles(1991)。The Ethics of Authenticity。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Rawls, John(2005)。A Theory of Justice。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.林逢祺(2012)。教育規準論。台北:五南文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sandel, Michael J.(2005)。Public philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Sandel, Michael J.(1996)。Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.江宜樺(20010000)。自由民主的理路。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Sandel, Michael J.、樂為良(2011)。正義:一場思辨之旅。雅言。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Sennett, Richard(1998)。Michael Sandel and Richard Rorty: Two Models of the Republic。Debating Democracy's Discontent。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Sandel, Michael J.(1988)。The Political Theory of the Procedural Republic。The Power of Public Ideas。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE