臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國民小學教師教學倦怠之研究
書刊名：國民教育研究學報
作者：林炎旦 引用關係
出版日期：1995
卷期：1
頁次：頁57-84
主題關鍵詞：國民小學；教師；教學倦怠
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:24
　　　　　本研究之上要目的：1.探討國民小學教師教學倦怠之現況：2.探討國民小學教師教學倦怠之成因;3.探討國民小學教師教學假怠之因應策略；4.研擬改進國民小學教師教學倦怠之具體建議。 研究方法以問卷調查為主；研究樣本選取採「分層等額隨機抽樣」的原則，抽取具代表性樣本1200人；研究工具採自編之「國民小學教師教學狀況」量表。 本研究之主要發現為：1.國民小學教師普遍存有教學倦怠現象;2.國小教師之性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、職務性質、服務年資、月薪、重新擇業類別等八項背景因素對教學倦怠感受達顯著差異水準；3.國小教師之重新擇業類別、職務性質、年齡、服務年資四項背景因素對情緒耗竭感受達顯著預測水準；4.國小教師之年齡、重新擇業類別、職務性質、性別、教育程度五項背景因素對缺人性化感受達顯著預測水準;5.國小教師之月薪、重新擇業類別二項背景因素對低成就感感受達顯著預測水準;6.國小教師認為家長對學生疏於管教為最主要教學佟怠原因，第二為尊師重道觀念低落，第三為授課時數過多;7.國民小學教師認為學校因素為最主要教學俺怠來源，其次為社會因素，最後才是個人因素；而學校因素中又以學生方面為最主要因素，其次為教學方面，最後才是組織方面。 本研究提出社會大眾觀念、政府行政機構、學校行政組織及教師自我調適三方面之具體建議，以為改進國民小學學校教師教學催怠之參考。
　　　　　The main purposes of this study are: 1. To find out the teaching burnout situation of the teachers in primary schools. 2. To analyze the reasons of the teachers' teaching burnout in primary schools. 3. To analyze the coping strategies of the teachers' teaching burnout in primary schools. 4. To concrete suggestion for solving the problems of the teachers' teaching burnout in primary schools. The major methods of this study are the questionnaire survey. the interview survey, and the expert consultation. The samples was selected by the method of "stratified equal-size random sampling", The sample was 1200 teachers. The instrument of this study is "The Inventory of The Teachers' Teaching Burnout ". The results of this study was followed as : 1.The teaching burnout was found the teachers. 2. The eight personal background factors (including sex, age, marital status, educational degree, property of job, years of service, salary, job choices again) was found to significant difference level in teaching burnout. 3.The four person background factors ( in-cluding job choices again, property of job. age, years of service) could predict the emotion exhaustion structure of teaching burnout effectively. 4. The five person background factors (including age, job choices again, property of job. sex, educational degree) could predict the unpersonality structure of teaching burnout effectively, 5. The two person background
期刊論文
1.Pines, A.、Kafry, D.(1978)。Occupational tedium in the social services。Social Work，23(6)，499-507。  new window
2.Spaniol, L.、Caputo, J.(1980)。How to recognize, cope with and avoid professional burnout。Instructional Innovator，25(9)，18-20。  new window
3.Farber, B. A.、Miller, J.(1981)。Teacher burnout: A psycho-educational perspective。Teachers College Record，83(2)，235-243。  new window
4.Bardo, P.(1979)。The pain of teacher burnout: a case history。Phi Delta Kappan，6(4)，252-253。  new window
5.Gold, Y.(1985)。Burnout: Causes and solutions。Clearing House，58(5)，210-212。  new window
6.Glicken, M. D.(1983)。A counseling approach to employee burnout。Personnel Journal，62(3)，222-228。  new window
7.Farber, B. A.、Miller, J.(1981)。Teacher burnout :A psycho-educational perspective。Psychology，71(1)，102-110。  new window
8.Morgan, S. R.、Krehbiel, R.(1985)。The psychological condition of burned-out teachers with a nonhumanistic orientation。Journal of Humanistic Education and Development，24(2)，59-67。  new window
9.Walsh, D.(1979)。Classroom stress and teacher burnout。Phi Delta Kappan，61，1-15。  new window
10.Hobfoll, Stevan E.(1989)。Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress。American Psychologist，44(3)，513-524。  new window
11.郭生玉(19870500)。教師工作心厭與背景因素關係之研究。教育心理學報，20，37-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Maslach, Christina、Jackson, Susan E.(1981)。The Measurement of Experienced Burnout。Journal of Organizational Behavior，2(2)，99-113。  new window
13.Iwanicki, E. F.(1983)。Toward understanding and alleviating teacher burnout。Theory Into Practice，22(1)，27-32。  new window
會議論文
1.Raquepaw, J.、DeHass, P. A.(1984)。Factors influencing teacher burnout。The 56th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association。Chicago。  new window
2.Borthwick, P.(1982)。Teacher burnout:a study of professional and personal variables。Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。Houston, TX。  new window
3.Byrne, B. M.(1989)。Teacher burnout : validating the Maslach Burnout Inventory across four educational levels。Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association，(會議日期: 1989/08/11)。New Orleans, LA。  new window
4.Byrne, B. M.、Hall, L. M.(1989)。An investigation of factors contributing to teacher burnout: the elementary, intermediate, secondary, and postsecondary school environments。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association，(會議日期: 1989/03/27-31)。San Francisco, CA。  new window
5.Mcintyre, T.(1982)。Factors related to burnout: A Review of Research。Annual International Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children，(會議日期: 1985/04/11-16)。Houston, TX。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡淑娟(1990)。影響成人教育工作人員工作倦怠之相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝茉莉(1989)。工作角色壓力、性格特質與工作倦怠之相關研究--以助人專業者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周立勳(1986)。國小教師工作壓力、控制信念與職業倦怠關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉淑慧(1987)。助人工作者職業倦怠量表之編製與調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖貴鋒(1986)。國中教師角色衝突、角色不明確與工作倦怠之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Paciolla, R. C.(1984)。The relationship between teacher's perceptions of leadership behaviors of principals and teacher's perceptions of burnout in their work environment(博士論文)。University of Virginia。  new window
7.李垣武(1988)。臺灣省國民小學教師工作疲乏與其背景因素差異之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃淑珍(1988)。國中教師背景因素、工作情境、人格特質與工作倦怠的相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Murgatroyd, S.、Woolfe, A.(1982)。Coping with Crisis: Understanding and helping people in need。Chigaco：Harper & Row。  new window
2.Dworkin, A. G.(1985)。When teacher give up: teacher burnout, teacher turnover and their impact on children。Austin：Texas University：Hogg Foundation for Mental Health。  new window
3.Pines, A.、Aronson, E.、Kafry, D.(1981)。Burnout: Form tedium to personal growth。New York：The Free Press。  new window
4.Rathbone, C.、Benedict, C.(1980)。A study of teacher burnout at the junior high school level。Portsmouth, N. H.：New England Teach Corps Network。  new window
5.Truch, S.(1980)。Teacher burnout and what to do about it。Novato, California：Academic Therapy Publication。  new window
6.林清江(1986)。教育的未來導向。臺北：臺灣書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, Appraisal, and Coping。Springer。  new window
單篇論文
1.Johnson, A. B.(1981)。Special Education Teacher Burnout: A Three Part Investigation(ED209825)。  new window
2.Hock, R. R.(1985)。Professional burnout among public school teachers(ED264219)。  new window
3.Crane, S. J.，Iwanicki, E. F.(1986)。Perceived role conflict, role ambiguity, and burnout among special education teachers(JC:2521)。  new window
其他
1.Arreenich, T.(1981)。A study of factors influencing the burnout sydro-me as perceived by North Dakota public school classroom teachers。  new window
2.Brightwell, M. A.(1986)。Factors involved in burnout among West Virginia teachers of exceptional children。  new window
3.Goodall, B. J. B.(1986)。Intergroup variability of burnout among special education teachers of the emotionally disturbed, behavioral disordered, severe learning disabled, and the trainable mentally handicapped。  new window
4.Lamonica, A.(1983)。An investigation of factors related to psychological stress and burnout in teachers of severely handicapped children。  new window
5.Malanowski, J. R.(1980)。A study of the relationships among burnout (stress) , personal orientation,and demographic variables of teachers。  new window
6.Samuel, B. L.(1985)。An investigation of teacher characteristics and the effect of high school principals leadership effectiveness and adaptability on teacher burnout (style, morale)。  new window
7.Schwab, R. L.(1981)。The relationship of role conflict, role ambiguity, teacher background variables and perceived burnout among teachers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：814（臺灣：797，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2219088 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68026118
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上