:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:嘉義市國小社會科教師的世界觀教學現況研究
書刊名:國民教育研究學報
作者:洪美齡
作者(外文):Horng, Meei-ling
出版日期:1997
卷期:3
頁次:頁45-73
主題關鍵詞:國小社會科教學教師世界觀
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:61
     本研究的目的在探查探查嘉義市國小教師的世界觀教學現況,六十位受訪對象是 自八十四學年度擔任社會科教學的各國小教師中產生,由研究者親赴各校訪談每一位教師。 研究發現如下:(1) 參與研究的教師對世界觀教育的看法並不一致。(2) 大多數的教師認為 國小社會科教學應拓展學生的世界觀。(3) 到目前為止,教師們最主要拓展世界觀的途徑是 旅行國外的跨文化學習。(4) 國外的跨文化經驗增加教師世界觀教學的正確性、權威性。不 論是科任或級任教師應用其國外經驗於社會科教學的方式是隨機融入。(5) 除了師生國外經 驗的應用外,配合時事、鼓勵吸收媒體資訊及使用圖片、相片或錄影帶等輔助教材是教師們 教導學生世界觀的其他做法。(6) 雖然教師普遍指出低、中年級的社會科教學以鄉土為主, 高年級才會教到世界觀,但是仍有多位教師強調鄉土與世界的學習並不受年級限制而有相輔 相成的關係。(7) 由於對世界觀看法不一,因此教師們用不同的標準來評定自己的世界觀教 學知能。多數教師自認已能勝任世界觀教學的重任,但是對世界觀教育愈為重視的教師,愈 強調自己英語能力有待充實。 同時,他 (她 ) 們也指出世界觀教育相關知識進修的必要性 。
     The purpose of this study is to investigate whether elementary school teachers in Chiayi City teach social studies from a global perspective. Participants in this study were teachers who teach social studies in 1995 school year. Sixty teachers selected from the participants were interviewed. There are seven major findings in this study: 1. The participant hold different perspectives regarding global education. 2. Most teachers recognize the importance of teaching social studies from a global perspective. 3. So far, traveling abroad is the major approach for teachers to promote their global perspectives. 4. Teachers who have traveled abroad reported that they teach social studies with more accuracy and authority. Both departmental and self-contained teachers favor the infusion approach while teaching social studies from a global perspective. 5. In addition to applying teachers' and students' cross-cultural experiences abroad, the participants teach global perspectives by integrating current events, acquiring new information from mass media, and using supplementary teaching materials, such as pictures, photos, and videotapes. 6. Teachers pointed out that the emphases of social studies in lower-intermediate grades are from local perspectives. And, the emphases of social studies in upper grades expand to cover global perspectives. However, some teachers stressed that teaching social studies from local perspectives or global perspectives shouldn't have grade differences. Both perspectives are actually complementary. 7. Due to different perspectives, teachers evaluate their teaching ability with different criteria. Most teachers have confidence in teaching social studies from a global perspective. However, some teachers stressed that they need to enhance their English ability. Also, they mentioned that the courses regarding global education should be provided.
期刊論文
1.Kobus, D. K.(1983)。The developing field of global education: A review of the literature。Education Researcher Quarterly,8(1),21-28。  new window
2.林彩岫(19891200)。小學的全球教育。國教輔導,29(2)=274,7-11。  延伸查詢new window
3.Angell, A. V.、Avery, P. G.(1992)。Examining global issues in the elementary classroom。The Social Studies,83(3),113-117。  new window
4.National Council for the Social Studies(1982)。Position statement on global education。Social Education,46(1),36-38。  new window
5.Wilson, A. H.(1984)。Teachers as short-term international sojourners: Opening windows on the world。The Social Studies,75(4),153-157。  new window
6.黃景裕(1994)。我國小學世界觀教育課程之實施。台海兩岸,12,47-59。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡清華(19870600)。社會科教學的新途徑:「全球教育」課程之分析。教育文粹,16,12-19。  延伸查詢new window
8.Case, R.(1993)。Key Elements of a Global Perspective。Social Education,57(6),318-325。  new window
9.郭金水、賈立人、楊慧琪(19940600)。國立臺北師範學院全球教育實施現況分析。臺北師院學報,7,379-426。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭金水(19921200)。國際化時代的國小社會科教育。國民教育,33(3/4),2-11。  延伸查詢new window
11.Collins, H. T.、Czarra, F. R.、Smith, A. F.(1996)。Guidelines for global and international studies education: Challenges, cultures, connections。Issues in Global Education,135/136。  new window
12.Kniep, W. M.(1985)。Global education in the eighties。Curriculum Review,25(2),16-18。  new window
13.Nakayama, S.(1989)。A view from Japan。Social Education,53(3),156-187。  new window
14.簡妙娟(19921000)。世界觀教育之基本概念。中等教育,43(5),33-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Tye, K. A.、Kniep, W. M.(1991)。Global education around the world。Educational Leadership,48(7),47-49。  new window
16.張秀雄(19951200)。世界觀導向的公民教育。中等教育,46(6),26-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Wilson, A. H.(1982)。Cross-cultural experiential learning for teachers。Theory into Practice,21(3),184-192。  new window
會議論文
1.Gilliom, M. E.(1992)。Anatomy of a study tour-purposc and pavoff。The annual meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies,(會議日期: 1992/11/20)。Detroit。  new window
2.Lister, I.(1989)。Approaches to research on global and international education in the UK and Western Europe。The Conference of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco。  new window
3.Merryfield, M. M.(1992)。From teacher education to the classroom: Reflections of practitioners on their teacher education experiences in global perspectives。The Conference of the American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: 1992/04/020)。San Francisco。  new window
研究報告
1.洪美齡(1996)。教師的世界觀教學研究:以嘉義市國小社會科教師為例 (計畫編號:NSC85-2413-H-023-003)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Partricia, A. K.(1993)。Elementary teachers' perceptions of global education in curricula(碩士論文)。The University of Regina。  new window
2.Oram, S. D.(1995)。The effects of an institute on global education on teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward global education(碩士論文)。University of Newfoundland。  new window
3.Wagner-Ratliff, A.(1994)。How one middle school inner-city teacher implemented global education into her classroom instruction: A case study(-),Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
4.Wieber, D. L.(1982)。An assessment of global knowledge of K-12 teachers in an American-sponsored overseas school(博士論文)。Michigan State University。  new window
圖書
1.Iowa State Dept of Education, Des Moines(1989)。A guide for integrating global education across the curriculum。Des Moines, IA:Iowa State Dept of Education。  new window
2.Tye, B. B.、Tye, K. A.(1992)。Global education. A study of school change。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Strauss, A.、Corbin, J.(1990)。Basics of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
4.Hanvey, R. G.(1976)。An attainable global perspcetive。New York:Global Perspective in Education。  new window
5.Merryfield, M. M.(1996)。Making connections between multicultural and global education。Washington, D. C.:American Association of Colleges for Teacher。  new window
6.Wilson, A. H.(1993)。The meaning of international experience for schools。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
7.Homg, M. L.(1994)。The influence of a teacher's international/cross-cultural experiences on teaching elementary social studies from a global perspective: A case study in Taiwan, Republic of China。Ann Arbor, MI:UMI Dissertation Services。  new window
8.Kniep, W. M.(1987)。Next steps in global education: A handbook for curriculum development。New York:The American Forum。  new window
9.National Council for the Social Studies(1994)。Curriculum standards for social studies: Expectations of excellence。Washington, DC:National Council for the Social Studies。  new window
10.黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.彭婉如、洪萬生(19940000)。教材設計與社會文化。台灣的教育改革。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bennett, C. F.(1992)。Strengthening multicultural and global perspectives in the curriculum。Multicutiral education: A global approach。New York:The American Forum for Global Education。  new window
3.陳膺宇(1993)。析判思考在多元文化教育上之意義。多元文化教育。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE