課程圖像重建：學校全球教育課程發展之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	課程圖像重建：學校全球教育課程發展之研究
作者：	顏佩如
作者(外文)：	Yen, Pey-ru
校院名稱：	國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：	教育研究所
指導教授：	黃政傑甄曉蘭
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2004
主題關鍵詞：	課程圖像重建；全球教育；課程發展；課程融入；行動研究；curriculum pictures reconstructed；global education；curriculum development；curriculum infusing；action research
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(10) 專書(2) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:8 共同引用:0 點閱:48

課程圖像重建：學校全球教育課程發展之研究
摘要
本研究旨在探討學校全球教育課程發展的合理性基礎與實施內涵，並透過探究全球教育融入國中英語課程的實施運作與成效，對於學校全球教育課程發展提出可行的建議，試圖重建學校課程圖像。本研究運用行動研究的方法，透過文獻分析、訪談、教室觀察、文件作品分析以及簡易的班級問卷，將課程行動研究規劃為前導研究與正式研究兩大階段，研究者經由此研究獲得許多研究省思與自我成長，並提出相關結論與建議如下：
壹、結論
一、全球教育的合理性基礎在於回應世界性問題與時代變遷的需求，貼近今日世界村生活。
二、全球教育的實施內涵應包含人類生存的所有範疇，包含六大目標－層面，運用「多元學科教育哲學」融入現行所有學科當中，以多元學科交互連結、跨學科的全球觀點、教與學的多元模式為一般原則，並運用相關配套措施改善全球教育實施情境，發揮潛在課程的影響。
三、學校全球教育班級教學實施需考慮到研究倫理與合法性，運用相關配套措施，全球教育課程的發展有助於學生發展獨立與多元的信念與觀點。
貳、建議
一、就全球教育哲理建構的而言，全球教育立論與內涵需回應到「世界性問題的解決」，而且因時因地制宜，並顧及「全球與本土關係的平衡」，關注自身的教育目的與內涵，培養全球系統的觀念，並以個人、家族、社稷、國家、國際等參與國際的思維與路線，建構全球教育世界意識。
二、就學校教育而言，學校全球教育課程發展應將全球教育轉化為「議題」、「概念」或「策略」，融入現有的各學校課程中，其內涵應包含全人類在世界生存的所有範疇，並從使用者導向的觀點規劃與實施，採科際整合取向融入策略，並參照「多元學科教育哲學的精神，採用多元學科交互連結與跨學科的全球觀點，採取教與學的多元模式，應重視多元觀點的建立，鼓勵以多元的方式展現學習成果，並運用社會運動的向度的分析來探究課程實施情境，以教師自我成長、建構學校革新機制、校外機構夥伴關係的鷹架協助，並於師範教育中加入全球教育的因子，改善課程實施情境，發揮潛在課程的影響。
三、對於課程行動研究之方法而言，行動研究者需深度的自省與對話，做好系統的資料蒐集與管理，避免對於研究期望過高，學習從本土文化角度發展全球教育課程，並須時時自我惕勵與樂觀進取，積極尋求在課程現場的合法性，並建立與研究諍友等的夥伴關係。

以文找文

Curriculum Pictures Reconstructed: A Research on School Curriculum Development for Global Education
Abstract
This thesis mainly explored the rationale and practice of school curriculum development for global education, and tried to infuse the global education into curriculum practice in order to reconstruct curriculum pictures of schools in Taiwan and tried to give practicable suggestions for school curriculum development of global education. The study applied the action research method, and collected the data by literature review, interviews, classroom teaching observation, documents analysis, and simple class questionnaires and etc. In addition, the author infused the global education into the curriculum of English, guidance and assistance, boy and girl scouts and club activities in the pilot study. In the second stage, the author only infused the global education into the curriculum of English and related club activities in the formal study. The conclusions and suggestions are followed：
1. Conclusions:
Firstly, the rationale of curriculum development for global education mainly responded to the world issues and answered to the changing epoch, especially answered to the challenge of the politics and religions. The context of the globalization gave us the reflections that we hoped to bring reconciliation to the controversies and to promote the international peace. Moreover, the core viewpoint of global education was that pressed students close to the real world life nowadays.
Secondly, the contents of curriculum practice of global education should include the all categories of the humankinds’ existence. Moreover, the writer divided the contents of global education into six objectives and aspects and used the spirits of the multidisciplinary educational philosophy, the mutual connection of multi- subjects, the global views of inter-subjects and the multi-models of teaching and learning for global education. We also should add some global education factors into the training programs and education of initial teachers.
Thirdly, the researcher thought that we should considered the ethics and the legality of research in class teaching for global education and used useful measures to form a complete set to improve our teaching. Finally, students had developed their own beliefs and had diversifiable points of view about global education.
2. Suggestions：
Firstly, the basic argumentation and the contents of global education should answer to the problems- solving of the worldwide issues and they should be suitable to their own epoch and their own specific locations.
Secondly, the researcher suggested us to convert global education into issues, concepts and strategies and infused them into all the school subjects, include the all categories of the humankinds’ existence ,used the user-view trend to develop them. The writer also suggested to make use of the spirits of the multidisciplinary educational philosophy, the mutual connection of multi- subjects, the global views of inter-subjects and the multi-models of teaching and learning.
Thirdly, action researchers should have deeply reflections, dialogues and manage the data system well. We also should avoid to have much higher expectation, and try to develop global education form the aspect of local culture, and always find the research faithful partners to deliberate the study in other side.

以文找文

參考文獻
一、中文部分
王芳（2003年，6月9日）。打出新的旗幟，得到法國的支持－拒絕富國治理世界，反全球化運動變了調子。環球時報，第六版。
王明源（1999）。全球教育的理論與實施。國教輔導，34（4），9-13。
反全球化大事記（2001年，8月17日）。人民日報。第七版。
向青（2001年，9月7日）。反全球化與和平主義。人民日報。第七版。
佚名（譯）（2002），Wadlow, R.著。積極的世界公民教育。台灣區世界公民總會網站。2000年10月20日，取自http://www.worldcitizens.org.tw/articles/show1-6.html
李子建、黃顯華（1996）。課程：範式、取向和設計。台北：五南書局。 new window

沈宗瑞、高少凡、許湘濤、陳淑鈴（譯）（2001），D. Held, A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt, & J. Perration著。全球化大轉變：全球化對政治、經濟與文化的衝擊。台北：韋伯文化。
沈坤宏（1996）。國小六年級學童世界觀之研究－以彰化縣為例。國立台東師範學院國教所碩士論文，未出版，台灣台東。
林彩岫（1989）。小學的全球教育。國教輔導，29（2），7-11。
高薰芳、蔡大立（2002）。第四章全球教育在師資培育實施之研究：職前教師全球視野之培育。載於中華民國師範教育學會（主編），師資培育的政策與檢討（頁74-121）。台北：中華民國師範教育學會。
桂宏誠（2001）。邁向全球化，先了解全球化。國政論壇。台北：財團法人國家政策研究基金會。（2001年11月20日，內政部文件編號：內政（評）090-201）。
夏林清、中華民國基層教師協會（譯）（1997），H. Altrichter, P. Poch, & B. Somekh著。行動研究方法導論－教師動手作研究。台北：遠流出版社。
郭金水、賈立人、楊慧琪（1994）。國立臺北師範學院全球教育實施現況分析。臺北師院學報，7，379-426。
教育部（2000）。九年一貫課程綱要。台北：教育部。（89.9.30 台 (89) 國字第89122368號令公布）。
教育部國教司（1995a）。國民中學課程標準總綱。2000年10月20日，取自http://www.edu.tw/primary/business/2%2D2%2D1%2D1.htm
教育部國教司（1995b）。國民中學課程標準實施要點。2001年11月20日，取自http://www.edu.tw/primary/business/2%2D2%2D1%2D1.htm
教育部國語推行委員會所（主編）（1998）。國語辭典。台北：教育部國語推行委員會，69。
黃景裕（1994）。我國小學世界觀教育課程之實施。臺海兩岸，12，47-59。
葉連祺（2002）。中小學教師行動研究策略之探討。台北市：台北市社子國小。 new window

楊俊鴻（2002）。後現代思潮與課程改革：從後現代的再現觀談課程研究的新趨勢。教育研究月刊，102，67-75。 new window

楊慧琪（1992）。放寬社會科教育的新視界－從全球教育及兒童權利的觀點談起。國民教育，33（3, 4），12-14。
鄭燕祥（1990）。新世紀教育改革：多元智能與全球化、本土化及個別化。載於中國教育學會（主編），新世紀的教育願景（1-41）。台北：台灣書店。
蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究。台北：五南書局。
蔡清華（1987）。社會科教學的新途徑－全球教育課程之分析。教育文粹，16，12-19。
鍾啟泉（主編）（2001）。全球教育展望。全球教育展望月刊，30（4），1-77。
簡妙娟（1992）。世界觀教育之基本概念。中等教育，43（5），33-40。 new window

顏佩如（1998）。中新90年代教育改革之比較研究－教育改革報告書之剖析。國立暨南國際大學比較教育研究者碩士論文，未出版，台灣南投。 new window

二、西文部分
Alexandre, L. & Commins, S. (1989）. The national governs’ report: A myopic vision, Access, 89：5-6.
Alger, C. F. & Hoovler, D. G. (1978). You and your community in the world. Columbus, Ohio: Consortium for International Studies Education, The Ohio State University.
Alger, C. F. & Harf, J. E. (1984). Global education: Why? for whom? about what? Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Alger, C. F. & Harf, J. E. (1986). Global education: Why? for whom? about what? In R. E. Freeman(ed.). Promising practices in global education: A handbook of case studies (pp. 1-13). New York: National Council on Foreign Language & International Studies in collaboration with Global Perspectives in Education.
Anderson, L. F. (1991). A rationale for global education. In K. A. Tye(Ed.). Global education: From thought to action (pp.13-34). (The 1991 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ASCD). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Ayyar, R. V. (1996). Educational policy planning & globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(4), 347-354.
Bank, J. A. (1988). Multiethnic education: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). Massachusetts, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Becker, J. M. (1969). An examination of objectives, needs & priorities in the United States elementary & secondary schools (Report of the U.S. Office of Education on Project 6-2408). Bethesda, Maryland: U.S. Office of Education .
Becker, J. M. (1979). Schooling for a global age. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Bennet, C., Niggle, T., & Stage, F. (1989). Preservice multicultural teacher education: Predictors of student readiness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, California.
Bennet, C. (1990). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). Massachusetts, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ben-Peretz, M. (1975). The concept of curriculum potential. Informal Section- Curriculum Theory Network, 5(2), 151-159.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization & economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1-25.
Buehrer, D. J. (1992). The new age masqu’erade. San Francisco State University School of Education Review, 4: 1.
Cakmak, S. B. (1993). Educational and sociocultural roots of prejudices and approximations to globalism: American high school students perceptions of universal cultural diversity and concerns for humanity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation of Philosophy, the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Carter, D. J. (1991). Foreword. In K. A. Tye (Ed.). Global education- From thought to action (p. v). (1991 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ASCD). U.S.: ASCD.
Case, R. (1992). Key elements of a global perspective. San Francisco State University School of Education Review, 4: 1.
Connelly, M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3(2-3), 161-177.
Crossette, B. (2000, Sep). Globalization: Tops 3 U.N. agenda for world leaders. A paper presented at the Summit conferences of New York Times, NY.
Cunningham, G. (1990). Blowing the whistle on global education. Unpublished reporet. Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Education, Region VII.
Fowler, F. C. (1994). International arena：The global village. Journal of Education Policy, 9（5-6）, 89-102.
Fuss-Kirkwood, T. (1990). Miami high school. In K. A. Tye (Ed.). Global education: School-based strategies (pp. 109-116). Orange, CA: Interdependence Press.
Garnsey, W. & Stich, P. (Eds.). (1998). Global studies- A review text. New York: N & N.
Gay, G. (1983). Multiethnic education: Historical developments & future prospects. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 560-563.
Gilliom, M. E. (1993). Mobilizing teacher educators to support global education in preserves programs. Theory into Practice, 32(1), 40-46.
Green, A. (1999). Education & globalization in Europe & East Asia: Convergent & divergent trends. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 55-71.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The Falmer Press.
Guillory, E. B. & Guillory, L. M. (1989). Demystifying global education. Momentum, 25, 58-62.
Hanvey, R. G. (1976). An attainable global perspective. Denver, Colombia: Center for Teaching International Relations.
Hendrix, C. J. (1998). Globalizing the curriculum. The Clearing House, 71 (5), 305-309.
Henrny, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (1999). Working with/ against globalization in education. Journal of Education Policy, 14 (1), 85-97.
Hicks, D., & Townley, C. (Eds.). (1982). Teaching world studies: An introduction to global perspectives in curriculum. Harlow, England: Longman.
Hudock, T. (1990). Global perspectives in education. Global Pages, 8 (1), 7.
International Studies of High Schools (1992). Tomorrow’s schools today. Paper presented at the American Forum on the Educating in a Multicultural World. Philadelphia, PA.
Kniep, W. M. (1985). A critical review of the short history of global education: Preparing for new opportunities. Paper presented at the American Forum for global education, New York.
Kniep, W. M. (1986). A critical review of the short history of global education: Preparing for new opportunities. New York: Global Perspectives in Education..
Kniep, W. M. (1987). Next steps in global education: A handbook for curriculum development. New York: The American Forum.
Kniep, W. M. (1989). Global education as school reform. Educational Leadership, Sep., 43-44.
Lamy, S. L. (1987). The definition of a discipline: The objects & methods of analysis in global education. New York：Global Perspectives in Education.
Lamy, S. L. (1990). Global education: A conflict of images. In K. A. Tye(Ed.). Global education: From thought to action (pp.49-63). (The 1991 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ASCD). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Leestma, R. (1979). Looking ahead: An agenda for action. In J. M. Becker (ed.). Schooling for a global age (pp.77-90). New York: McGraw- Hill.
Lubeck, D. & Reger, T. (1990). McCluer North High School. In K. A. Tye (ed.). Global education: School-based strategies (pp. 87-98). Orange, CA: Interdependence Press.
McNeil, W. (1986). The rise of the west: A history of the human community. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Merryfield, M. M. & Harris, J. (Eds.). (1992). Getting started in global education: Essential literature, essential linkages for teacher educators. Draft of article to appear in San Francisco State University School of Education Review, 4: 1.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Governors’ Association Task Force on International Education (1989). American in transition- The international frontier. Access, 85, 1-11.
Naim, M. (2000). The FP interview: A talk with Michael Camdessus about God, globalization, & his years running the IMF. Foreign Policy, 120, 32-45.
National Seminar on the Implementation of International Schools (1980). Proceedings. Champaign- Urbana. IL: University of Illinois.
O’Neil, J. (1989). Global education: Controversy remains, but support growing. ASCD Curriculum Update, 29, 1-8.
Pinar, W. F. (2001, May). The internationalization of curriculum studies. A paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Taiwanese Association for Curriculum & Instruction, Taipei.
Po, T. (2001, February). Globalization , localization & individualization for the future. A paper presented at the International Conference on Education Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region (AERA.NET Bulletin Board). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Porter, P. & Vidovich, L. (2000). Globalization & higher-education policy. Educational Theory, 50(4), 449-473.
Pratte, R. (1983). Multicultural education: Four normative arguments. Educational Theory, 33, 21-32.
Ramler, S. (1991). Global education for the 21st century. Education Leadership, 48 (7), 44-48.
Reischauer, E. (1973). Toward the 21st century：Education for a changing world. A paper presented at the American Forum for global education, New York.
Rosengren, H. F., Marylee, C., & Wiley, D. S. (1983). Internationalizing your school: A handbook & resource guide for teachers, administrators, parents & school board members. New York：National Council on Foreign Language & International Studies.
Rothenberg, P. (1988). Integrating the study of race, gender, & class: Some preliminary observations. Feminist Teacher, 3, 37-42.
Schafly, P. (1986). What is wrong with global education? St. Louis Democrat, 6 March, 23.
Smith, A. (1988). The state of global education. Access, 25, 1-13.
Sny, C. (1980). Global education: An implementation plan & resource guide. Madison, Wis.：University of Wisconsin Press.
Starkey, H. (1994). Development education & human rights education. In A. Osler (ed.). Development education: Global perspectives in the curriculum(pp. 23-37). London: Cassel.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research & development. London: Open University.
Stirling, T. (1993). The principal’s role in staff development for global education at selected elite Chicago area secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation of Philosophy, the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago. Chicago, Illinois.
Swift, J. (1990). Adlai Stevenson High School. In K. A. Tye (ed.). Global education: school-based strategies (pp. 117-130). CA: Interdependence Press.
Task Force on Teaching as a Procession (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York：Carnegie Corporation.
Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard,B., & Henry, M. (1997). Charpter 4: Globalization, the state & education policy making. In Educational policy & the politics of change. London & New York：Roudledge.
Turnbull, P. (2000). Contesting globalization on the waterfront. In K.Smith (Ed.). Politics & society (pp.34-45). UK: Stoneham.
Tye, A. K.(Ed.). (1990). Global education: School- based strategies. Orange, California: Interdependence Press.
Tye, A. K.(Ed.). (1991). Global education- From thought to action. (1991Yearbook of the Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ASCD). US：ASCD.
Walter, D. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). NY: Macmillan.
Wood, R. (1987). Seeing the world as others see it. Liberal Education, 73, 2-5.
Wright, R. (2000).Will globalization make you happy? Foreign Policy, 120, 54-64.
附註;本文包含39個表.57個圖.另附90張照片.43個附錄

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	具歷史素養特質的教科書設計原則探討：以德法共同歷史教科書為例
2.	走一條回歸本質的學校課程評鑑之路
3.	論課程知識的公正限度及其超越
4.	國民中學教科書全球教育概念分析
5.	學校特色課程發展歷程之行動研究--從校長觀點出發
6.	餐旅倫理教育課程發展與課程設計之探討
7.	「國中學生全球化覺知量表」編製及模式之驗證研究
8.	大學校院理工科系跨領域課程品質評估量表發展之研究
9.	下課時間：另一種探究世界的課程
10.	我國教育實習學生知覺教師專業知能習得、運用與重要之研究
11.	課程轉化與實踐之美感向度
12.	基於教師憂慮反思香港中、小學--以普通話教中文的教學發展
13.	課程研究典範的轉移：從實證主義到後現代主義的隱喻探究
14.	香港科技大學中文課程的設置與實施
15.	教師指導學生自編鄉土教材之過程與結果之探索

1.	國民小學校長課程領導之個案研究：創新擴散理論視角
2.	一位國小校長課程領導觀追尋之敘事探究
3.	以全球議題為核心的國小社會領域國際教育課程發展
4.	視覺藝術課程參與社會實踐之行動研究--以尼泊爾LLES服務學習為例
5.	國小校長課程領導之研究 -以品格教育結合閱讀教育為例
6.	高齡者參與正向心理課程對其心理健康改善之研究─以雲林縣社區日間照顧中心為例
7.	高中美術科數位藝術課程之教學研究
8.	德勒茲「無器官（身）體」流變課程
9.	探尋桃花源～追尋我課程領導的實踐知識之敘事探究
10.	我國國民補習學校課程綱要總綱研擬團隊的展化學習歷程研究
11.	以產業導向建構高職機電整合技術能力指標與課程發展之研究
12.	職前教保員多元文化意識課程之建構與實踐
13.	國中技藝教育學程學生生活經驗之研究 :批判教育學觀點
14.	「Minsumainat vali！太陽出來了--那一年，我們一起演的戲」讀者劇場在布農族語校本課程發展之行動研究
15.	校長做為課程領導者的反思與追尋：一位國小校長的自傳俗民誌

1.	西方經典在臺灣劇場 : 改編與轉化
2.	鄉土教育的理論與實踐
3.	大學課程發展與學習成效評量
4.	幼兒體能與遊戲
5.	「藝術統整課程」理論與實踐之研究
6.	學校本位課程 : 發展領導與評鑑
7.	全球教育課程實踐 : 國小課程發展與課程融入
8.	課程理解 : 教師取向之研究
9.	課程改革 : 理念轉化與省思
10.	解嚴前後國小社會科教科書中的臺灣圖像
11.	課程實施
12.	課程管理 : 理論與實務
13.	課程政策決定 : 以國家教育改革法案為依據的課程決策
14.	學校本位課程評鑑 : 理念與實踐反省
15.	學校整體課程經營 : 學校課程發展的永續經營

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫