:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:評定量表標示語之心理量尺值研究:頻率及同意度詞
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:翁儷禎 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Li-jen
出版日期:1998
卷期:40:1
頁次:頁73-86
主題關鍵詞:心理量尺值評定量尺連續區間法頻率詞同意度詞Psychological scale valuesRating scalesSuccessive intervals methodFrequencyAgreement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:618
     本研究旨在探討評定量表標示語的心理量尺值,並比較不同方法所估計量尺值的 異同。瞭解不同量表標示語在受試者心目中的量尺值,可以作為將來編製相關量表之參考。 本研究探討頻率與同意程度兩類反應的標示語。由國內相關文獻回顧發現,同意類標示語依 其用詞可再分為同意度標示語、符合度標示語,與贊成度標示語三種。本研究以連續區間法 和簡化連續區間法,以及平均數和中位數分別估計各類修飾語之每一標示語的心理量尺值, 並發現四種方法估計的量尺值相關極高。文中亦討論本研究之限制以及未來研究方向。
     The psychological scale values of labels describing frequency of occurrence and degrees of agreement used in Chinese rating scales are estimated. Scales values obtained by different scaling methods are compared. Construction of the scale values of anchor labels helps investigator selecting appropriate labels for rating scales. The method of successive intervals and the simplified successive intervals scaling method were used to construct the scale values of the labels. Means and medians of subject responses were also used as estimates of scale values. The scale values from these four methods are highly correlated. Limitations of the present study and suggestions for future research are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Jenkins, G. D. Jr.、Taber, T. D.(1977)。A monte carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability。Journal of Applied Psychology,62(4),392-398。  new window
2.Likert, Rensis(2001)。A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes。Archives of Psychology,140(5),1-55。  new window
3.Likert, R.、Roslow, S.、Murphy, G.(1993)。A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstons Attitude Scales。Personal Psychology,46(3),689-690。  new window
4.Matell, M. S.、Jacoby, J.(1971)。Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity。Educational and Psychological Measurement,31(3),657-674。  new window
5.楊中芳、趙志裕(19871200)。中國受測者所面臨的矛盾困境:對過份依賴西方評定量表的反省。中華心理學刊,29(2),113-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.胡志偉、彭昭英、沈永正、楊金龍(19890600)。常用中文機率詞所代表的意義。中華心理學刊,31(1),1-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.柯永河(1994)。同一量尺,類似受試,不同作答方式會產生甚麼測驗結果?。測驗年刊,41,55-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bendig, A. W.(1954)。Reliability and the number of rating scales。Journal of Applied Psychology,38,38-40。  new window
9.Bendig, A. W.(1955)。Rater reliability and the heterogeneity of the scale anchors。Journal of Applied Psychology,39,37-39。  new window
10.Bruvold, W. H.(1977)。Reconciliation of apparent nonequivalence among alternative rating methods。Journal of Applied Psychology,62,111-115。  new window
11.Cliff, N.(1959)。Adverbs as multipliers。Psychological Review,66,27-44。  new window
12.Dixon, P. N.、Bobo, M.、Stevick, R. A.(1984)。Response differences and preferences for all-category-defined and end-defined Likert formats。Educational and Psychological Measurement,44,61-66。  new window
13.Edwards, A. L.、Gonzalez, R.(1993)。Simplified successive intervals scaling。Applied Psychological Measurement,17,21-27。  new window
14.French-Lazovik, G.、Gibson, C. L.(1984)。Effects of verbally labeled anchor points on the distributional parameters of rating measures。Applied Psychological Measurement,8,49-57。  new window
15.Hakel, M. D.(1968)。How often is often?。American Psychologist,23,533-534。  new window
16.Hancock, G. R.、Klockars, A. J.(1991)。The effect of scale manipulations on validity: Targetting frequency rating scales for anticipated performance levels。Applied Ergonomics,22,147-154。  new window
17.Jones, L. V.、Thurstone, L. L.(1955)。The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation。Journal of Applied Psychology,39,31-36。  new window
18.Klockars, A. J.、Hancock, G. R.(1993)。Manipulations of evaluative rating scales to increase validity。Psychological Reports,73,1059-1066。  new window
19.Klockars, A. J.、Yamagishi, M.(1988)。The influence of labels and positions in rating scales。Journal of Educational Measurement,25(2),85-96。  new window
20.Lissitz, R. W.、Green, S. B.(1975)。Effect of number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach。Journal of Applied Psychology,60,10-13。  new window
21.Low, G.、Tasker, I.、Hong, L.(1991)。The wording of bipolar attitude scales in Chinese。Educational Research,33(2),141-150。  new window
22.Masters, J. R.(1974)。The relationship between number of response categories and reliability of Likert-type questionnaires。Journal of Educational Measurement,11,49-53。  new window
23.Myers, J. H.、Warner, W. G.(1968)。Semantic properties of selected evaluation adjectives。Journal of Marketing Research,5(4),409-412。  new window
24.Newstead, S. E.、Arnold, J.(1989)。The effect of response format on ratings of teaching。Educational and Psychological Measurement,49(1),33-43。  new window
25.Newstead, S. E.、Collis, J. M.(1987)。Context and the interpretation of quantifiers of frequency。Ergonomics,30(10),1447-1462。  new window
26.Oaster, T. R. F.(1989)。Number of alternatives per choice point and stability of Likert-type scales。Perceptual and Motor Skills,68(2),549-550。  new window
27.Spector, P. E.(1976)。Choosing response categories for summated rating scales。Journal of Applied Psychology,61(3),374-375。  new window
28.Wallsten, T. S.、Budescu, D. V.、Rapoport, A.、Zwick, R.、Forsyth, B.(1986)。Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115,348-365。  new window
29.Wildt, A. R.、Mazis, M. B.(1978)。Determinants of scale response: Label versus position。Journal of Marketing Research,15,261-267。  new window
研究報告
1.翁儷禎(1996)。頻率及同意度副詞的心理量尺值研究。沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃恆獎(1986)。問卷調查量度方法之研究--以Likert量表為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Edwards, A. L.(1957)。Techniques of attitude scale construction。New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE