臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：適應性績效量表之發展及其與目標導向、前瞻人格之關係
作者：莊如松
作者(外文)：Chuang,Ju-Sung
校院名稱：國立政治大學
系所名稱：企業管理研究所
指導教授：韓志翔
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2007
主題關鍵詞：適應性績效；目標導向；前瞻人格；adaptive performance；goal orientation；proactive personality
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:54
在快速變動的環境下，員工的工作任務、職責，以及工作關係，也產生經常性的變動，工作內容及工作績效的定義變得更為複雜與動態，組織愈來愈重視員工是否能夠有效地因應環境的變化。因此，適應性績效逐漸受到重視而成為許多學者關切的議題。相對於任務性績效以及輔助性績效，適應性績效是屬於新興的概念，其指涉的內涵以及與其他重要組織變數之間的關係，仍有許多值得探討與研究的空間。
Pulakos等學者雖然發展出工作適應性量表，但該量表尚存在諸多改進的空間，特別是關於因素結構以及建構效度的檢驗。本論文的第一個子研究，即是以更為嚴謹的量表發展程序建構適應性績效量表。透過因素分析，我們發現適應性績效可以分成應變面、學習面以及關係面等三個次構面，我們也驗證了適應性績效確實有別於傳統的任務性績效與輔助性績效而成為獨立的工作績效構面。
另外，關於預測適應性績效的前置變數也仍存有研究缺口。本論文的第二個子研究，即是探討人格特質對於適應性績效的預測力。目前為止，五大人格對適應性績效的預測力並不是很理想，而且也有不太一致的結果。本研究建議，因為適應性績效強調的是員工面對工作環境變動時所展現出來的因應與學習的行為，所以應該選用更能符合適應性績效特性的人格變數，我們特別針對目標導向及前瞻人格做探討，因其都與個人的學習以及對環境因應有關。
實證結果發現，目標導向中的學習導向，對於應變面、學習面、關係面等適應性績效都具有正向的影響。迴避導向對應變面、學習面適應性績效有負向的影響。而證明導向則是對關係面適應性績效負向的影響。至於前瞻人格與適應性績效的關係則沒有獲得實證支持。另外，研究結果也發現，工作自主性對於前瞻人格與應變面適應性績效的關係具有正向的干擾效果；而任務複雜度對於迴避導向與應變面適應性績效之間的關係也同樣具有干擾效果。
Rapid technological developments, frequent organizational changes, and intensified global competition in the market place have increased the extent of turbulence and uncertainty in the workplace. Consequently, adaptive performance, a new topic in the field of job performance, has gained attention from academics and practitioners. Unlike task performance and contextual performance, the content and nomological network of adaptive performance is still unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study is to develop the scale of the adaptive performance, and explore the relationships among adaptive performance, goal orientation and proactive personality.
We found that adaptive is a three-dimensional construct (i.e. the adaptive performance in task area, the adaptive performance in learning new skills, the adaptive performance in interpersonal relations). Our empirical data verified that adaptive performance is discriminative from task performance and contextual performance.
Besides, we found that Learning Orientation is positively associated with the adaptive performance in task area, the adaptive performance in learning new skills, the adaptive performance in interpersonal relations. Avoidance Orientation is negatively associated with the adaptive performance in task area and the adaptive performance in learning new skills. Prove Orientation is negatively associated with the adaptive performance in interpersonal relations. As to relationship between proactive personality and adaptive performance, we did not found empirical support.
Finally, we found that job autonomy moderates the relationship between proavtive personality and the adaptive performance in task area, task complexity moderates the relationship between avoidance orientation and the adaptive performance in task area.
一、中文部份
林能白、丘宏昌，1999。服務品質之研究—服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用，管理學報，第十六卷第二期：175-200。new window
林淑姬，1992。薪酬公平、程序公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究，政治大學企管所博士論文。new window
邱淑芬、韓志翔、林盈君，2002。員工參與制度與組織公民行為之關係－以台灣電子產業為例，管理學報，第十九卷第六期：1009-1043。new window
翁儷禎，1998。評定量表標示詞之心理量尺值研究：頻率及同意度詞，中華心理學刊，第四十卷第一期：73-86。new window
郭怡谷，2005。新進員工社會化過程中目標導向特質、績效資訊與績效資訊搜尋行為之影響，東吳學企管所碩士論文。
黃家齊、許雅婷，2006。團隊成員人格特質對知識分享與創新績效之影響－個人與團隊層次的分析，管理學報，第二十三卷第二期：149-170。new window
黃家齊，2002。人力資源管理活動認知與員工態度、績效之關連性差異分析－心理契約與社會交換觀點，管理評論，第二十一卷第四期：101-127。new window
黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、王建忠，2003。轉型領導、團隊內互動，即對與成員效能：IPO模式之驗證，管理學報，第二十卷第三期：397-427。
蔡維奇，1999。招募策略－精挑細選之戰術。收錄在李誠主編，人力資源管理的十二堂課：53:76。台北市：天下文化。
韓志翔、簡博浩，2006。適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策的影響：以企業員工的績效表現為實驗情境。2006年台灣管理新思維研討會。台灣科技大學。
蘇昭宜，2006。目標導向與績效評估和晉升可能性評估的關係－以印象管理策略為中介變數，東吳學企管所碩士論文。

二、英文部分
Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. 1999. Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2): 97-111.
Ames, C. 1992. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261-271.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423.
Armstrong, J. S., & Ovetron, T. S. 1997. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396-402.
Ashford, S. J. 1986. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 465-487.
Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. 1996. Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 199-214.
Ashford, S. J., & Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. 2003. Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29: 773-799.
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. 1983. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32: 310-398.
Ashford, S. J., & Taylor, M. S. 1990. Adaptation to work transitions: An integrative approach. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, vol. 8: 1-39. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. N. 1991. Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 251-280
Atkin, C. 1973. Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P Clarke (Ed.), New models for communication research: vol. 3: 207-239. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. 1992. The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 836-874.
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. 2003. Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success. Source: Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 41-60.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
Barrick , M. R., & Mount, M. K. 1993. Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,78: 111-118.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M.K. 1991. The Big-Five personality dimensions and job performance, A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. 1993. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14: 103-118.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. 1999. Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations. Business Horizons, 42: 63-70.
Beaty, J. C., & Cleveland, J. N. 2001. The relationship between personality and contextual performance in strong and weak situations. Human Performance, 14(2): 125-148.
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2002. Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 497-505.
Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D. A., Shaffer, M. A., & Luk, D. M. 2005. Input-bases and time-based models of international adjustment: Meta-analytic evidence and theoretical extensions. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 257-281.
Bobko, P. 2001. Correlation and regression: Applications for industrial organizational psychology and management ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Bobko, P., & Colella, A. 1994. Employee reaction to performance standards: A review and research propositions. Personnel Psychology, 47:1-29.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 71–98. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1997. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2): 99–109.
Buss, D. M. 1987. Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 1214-1221.
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. 1996. Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67(1): 26-48.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. 2002. The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5): 875-884.
Campbell, D. J. 2000. The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3): 52-66.
Campbell, J. P. 1990. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 1: 687–732. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell, J. P. 1999. The definition and measurement of performance in the new age, In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development: 399-429. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. 1996. The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations: 258–299. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cascio, W. F. Applied psychology in personnel management (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Chan, D. 2000. Conceptual and empirical gaps in research on individual adaptation at work. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 15: 143-164. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, J. M. 2001. The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14(3): 209-230.
Chen, G., Thomas, B., & Wallace, J. C. 2005. A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 827-841.
Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. 1998. Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during learning process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 654-.665.
Comer, D. R. 1991. Organization newcomer’s acquisition of information from peers. Management Communication Quarterly, 5: 64-89.
Conway, J. M. 1999. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1): 3-13.
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R)and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
Crant, J. M. 2000. Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 435-462.
Crant, J. M. 1995. The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 532-537.
Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C.A., Shannon, H. S., Macinton, J., Lendrum, B. Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J. 2002. Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological, and behavioral correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 377-392.
Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555-590.
Daniel, T. L., & Esser, J. K. 1980. Intrinsic motivation as influenced by rewards, task interest, and task structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 566-573.
Deshon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. 2005. A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1096-1127.
Dweck, C. S. 1986. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41: 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95: 256-273.
Edwards, J. R. 1991. Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol.6: 283-357. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Edward, J. E., & Morrison, R. F. 1994. Selecting and classifying future naval officers: The paradox of greater specialization in broader areas. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Horris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: 69-84. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elliot, E. J., & Church, M. A. 1997. A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 218-232.
Elliot, E. J. & Dweck, C. S. 1988. Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 5-12.
Elliot, E. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. 1996. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 461-475.
Farr, J. L., Hofmann, D. A., & Ringenbach, K. L. 1993. Goal orientation and action control theory: Implications for industrial and organizational psychology. In G. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology , vol. 8: 193-232. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Gellatly, I. R., & Irving, P. G. 2001. Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers. Human Performance, 14(3), 231-245.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. 2005. Are conscientious workers adaptable? Australian Journal of Management, 30: 245-260.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. 2003. Adaptable behaviors for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2): 65-73.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Hall, D. T., & Marvis, P. H. 1995. The new career contract: Developing the whole person at mid-life and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behaviors, 47: 269-289.
Hesketh, B. & Neal, A. 1999. Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development: 21-55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organization Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
Hogan, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. 1996. Personality, trait, taxonomies, and application in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations: 31-88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holyoak, K. J. 1991. Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: 301-335. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, A. 1995. A framework for work change. In Howard A (Ed.), The changing nature of work: 3-44. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ilgen, D. R., & Knowlton, W. A. 1980. Performance attributional effects on feedback from superiors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25: 441-456.
Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. 1999. Employee performance in today’s organization. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development: 1-20. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jassen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. 2004. Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3): 368-384.
Johnson, J. W. 2001. The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5): 984-996.
Kanfer, R. & Ackerman, P. L. 1989. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 657-689.
Katz, D. 1980. Time and Work: Toward an integrated perspective. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 2: 81-127. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Katz, D., & Kohn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Weiley.
Kaufman, H. G. 1983. Factors related to use of technical information in engineering problem solving. New York: Polytechnic Institute of New York.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. 1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development: 240-292. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. 1987. Work design as an approach to person-environment fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31: 278-296.
Larson, J. R. 1986. Supervisory performance feedback to subordinates: The impact of subordinate performance valence and outcome dependency. Working paper. University of Illinois, Chicago.
Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Mobley, W. H. 1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741-755.
Lazarus, R. S. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York.
Lee, C., Ashford, S. J., & Bobko, P. 1990. Interactive effects of “Type a” and perceived control on worker performance, satisfaction, and somatic complains. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 870-881.
LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J., A. & Erez, A. 2000. Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3): 563-593.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. 1998. Multidimentionality of leader-member exchange: An Empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1): 43-72.
Lodon, M., & Mone, E. M. 1999. Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development: 119-153. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. 1999. Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38(1): 3-15.
MacAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59.
Madzar, S. 2001. Subordinates’ information inquiry: Exploring the effect of perceived leadership style and individual difference. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74: 221-232.
Major, D. A, Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. 2006. Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 927-935.
Martocchio, J. J., & Hertenstein, E. J. 2003. Learning orientation and goal orientation context: Relationships with cognitive and affective learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14: 413-434.
Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. 1997. Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10(4):303-330.
Miller, V. D., & Jablin, F. M. 1991. Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16: 92-120.
Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology: 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Morrison, E. W. 1993. Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 557-589.
Morrison, E. W., & Bies, R. J. 1991. Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 16: 522-541.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Schmit, M. J. 1999. Performance assessment in unique jobs. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of job performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development: 56–86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4): 475-480.
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Uhlman, C. E., & Costanza, D. P. 1993. Personality, adaptability, and performance: Performance on well-defined and ill-defined problem solving tasks. Human Performance, 6: 241-285.
Murphy, K. R. 1989. Dimensions of job performance. In Dillon R., & J. Pellingrino (Eds.), Testing: Applied and theoretical perspectives: 218-247. New York: Praeger.
Murphy, K. R. 1999. The challenge of staffing a postindustrial workplace. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation ,and development: 295-324. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy, K. R., & Shiarella, A. H. 1997. Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Personnel Psychology, 50: 823-854.new window
Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10: 85-97.
Parker, S. K. 2000. From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientation and role-breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49: 447-469.
Parker, S. K. 1998. Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 835-852.
Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. 1999. Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 925-939.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. 2006. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636-652.
Pearlman, K., & Barney, M. F. 1999. Selection in a changing workplace. In J. Kehoe (Eds.), Managing selection in changing organizations: Human resource strategies: 3-72. San Francicso: Jossey-Bass.
Philips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. 1997. Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficiency and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5): 792-802.
Porath, C. L., & Bateman, T. S. 2006. Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 185-192.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4): 612-624.
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Hedge, J., & Borman, W. C. 2002. Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4): 299-323.
Renn, R. W., & Fedor, D. B. 2001. Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27: 563-583.new window
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. 2002. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global rating of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 66-80.
Saucier, G. 1994. Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3): 506-516.
Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychology Bulletin, 124: 262-274.
Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. 2003. Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology: 77-105. Hoboken, HJ : John Wiley & Sons.
Schneider, B. 1983. Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 5: 1-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. 1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 580-607.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. 1999. Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 416-427.
Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 1997. Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design. In M. A. Quinones & A. Dudda (Eds.), Training for 21th century technology: Applications of psychological research: 89-118. Washionton, DC: APA Books.
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982: 290-312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. 2002. Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55: 167-194.
Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P., & Schmidt, A. M. 2000. Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 724–738.
Tannenbaum, S. I. 1998. Enhancing continuous learning: Diagnostic findings from multiple companies. Human Resource Management, 36: 437– 452.
Thompson, J. A. 2005. Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1011-1017.
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. 1997. Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1089-1121.
Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. 2002. The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback-seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 195-216.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. 1977. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2: 419-442.
Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. 1998. Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4): 758-771.
VandeWalle, D. 1997. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57: 995-1015.
VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. 1997. A test of the influence of goal orientation of the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 390-400.new window
VandeWalle, D., Ganesan, S., Challagalla, G. N. & Brown, S. P. 2000. An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: disposition, context, and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 996-1003.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1996. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4): 525-531.
Veale, D., Oliver, L., & van Langen, K. 1995. Three Coca Cola perspectives on international management styles. Academy of Management Executive, 9(3): 74-77.
Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Muller, J. D. 2000. Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 373-385.
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 540-555.
White, R. W. 1974. Strategies for adaptation: An attempt at systematic description. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation: 47-68. New York: Basic Books.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictor of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17: 601-617.
Wood, R. E. 1986. Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37: 60-82.
Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. 1996. Services marketing. New York: MaGraw Hill.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
2. 國民中學教師自我調節學習、驚輸、工作投入與組織公民行為關係之研究-以工作投入為中介變項
3. 臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
4. 高雄市國民小學校長家長式領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究
5. 國民小學組織正義、組織公民行為與競爭優勢關係之研究：以領導者 與部屬交換關係為調節效果
6. 長期照顧機構照顧服務員之人力資源措施與組織公民行為之研究
7. 新北市中學校長人格特質、決策風格與危機管理關係之研究
8. 高級中等學校校長領導行為與教師工作投入程度之關係研究-教師心理資本與工作動機的中介效果
9. 國民小學行政主管人格特質、組織承諾對學校特色課程影響之個案研究
10. 團隊外顯與內隱協調於團隊活動之中介角色： 量表發展與實證
11. 影響護理人員任務績效與離職意向因素之跨層次研究
12. 資訊治理觀點下資訊策略定位與業務校準之研究
13. 越南胡志明市高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
14. 人格理論與公共行政：史坦恩的人格概念及其應用
15. 國民小學主任人格特質、組織承諾、組織公民行為及工作績效關係之研究
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1133（臺灣：1112，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67544513
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上