:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:退休老人與大學生在生活場域中的關係與面子
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:蘇珊筠黃光國
作者(外文):Su, Shan-yunHwang, Kwang-kuo
出版日期:2003
卷期:45:3
頁次:頁295-311
主題關鍵詞:生活場域面子感受關係親近他人Domains of lifeFace-related emotionsInterpersonal relationsSignificant other
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:93
本研究的主要目的在探討:處於不同生活場域的老年人與大學生,在面子事件的感受方面,有麵差異性存在。依據過去研究發現與理論的推演,本研究提出三個命題:(1)老年人所感受的面子事件,較多涉及他在親密社會中賦予的地位,麗即他在親密社會中為人父母的輩分;而大學生所感受的面子,會較著重運作社會中獲致之地位,亦即身為一個學生的課業成就表現;(2)和大學生相較之下,老年人所認定的面子事件,較多涉及親近他人的行為表現;(3)不論是老年人或大學生,都會注重維護其道德性的臉面。同時並以三項實徵研究的資料來說明上述命題。研究一以訪談方式,蒐集老年人與大學生對「有面子/沒面子」事件的看法。結果顯示:確實有上述三項命題所主張的趨勢存在。研究二以配對比較作業,探討研究一所得到的結果。結果顯示:在有面子方面,老年人對「子女品德」與「子女成就」的正向事件感到最有面子,大學生則是對「自己成就」與「自己品德」的正向事件。在沒面子方面,老年人與大學生都是對「自己品德」的正向事件。在沒面子方面,老年人與大學生都是對「自己品德」的負向事件感到最沒面子。研究三要求參與者評估自己受不同社會對象公開批評的面子感受,結果顯示:最可能讓老年人感到沒面子的是受到「子女」公開指責;對大學生來說,則是「老師」。
Differences between senior citizens and university students in the experience of various face-related emotions in contemporary Taiwanese society are explored. Based on our theoretical analyses of the Chinese concept of face, three hypotheses are proposed: (1)Senior citizens are more sensitive to face episodes related to their ascribed status in intimate society, while university students are more sensitive to face episodes related to their achieved status in operative society. (2)Compared with university students, senior citizens are more sensitive to face episodes caused by significant other. (3)Both senior citizens and university students are concerned about maintenance of their moral face. Three empirical studies were conducted to test these hypotheses. Qualitative data about face episodes collected in Study 1 supported all three hypotheses. Parried comparison tasks in Study 2 showed that senior citizens experience face through morality and achievement of their children, while university students are more sensitive to face episodes related to personal achievement and morality. Both groups felt loss of face for negative episodes of personal morality. In Study 3 participants evaluated their feelings toward a scenario of being publicly blamed by different social targets. Blame by one’s own children was most likely to make senior citizens lose face, while blame by a professor had a greater effect for university students.
期刊論文
1.Thurstone, L. L.(1927)。A Law of Comparative Judgement。Psychological Review,34(2),273-286。  new window
2.成中英(1986)。The Concept of Face and Its Confucian Roots。Journal of Chinese Philosophy,13,329-348。  new window
3.Carstensen, L. L.(1991)。Socioemotional Selectivity Theory: Social Activity in Life-span Context。Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics,11(1),195-217。  new window
4.Hwang, K. K.(1997)。Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society。Intercultural Communication Studies,7(1),17-42。  new window
5.何有暉(1976)。On the concept of face。American Journal of Sociology,81(4),867-884。  new window
6.胡先縉(1944)。The Chinese Concepts of 'Face'。American Anthropologist,46(1),45-64。  new window
7.Carstensen, Laura L.(1992)。Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory。Psychology and Aging,7(3),331-338。  new window
8.莊耀嘉、楊國樞(19970600)。角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究,7,282-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃光國(1987)。Face and favor: the Chinese power game。American Journal of Sociology,92(4),944-974。  new window
10.Alexander, S. N.、Lauderdale, P.(1977)。Situated Identities and Social Influence。Sociometry,40(3),225-233。  new window
11.Boden, D.、Bielby, D. D. V.(1983)。The Past as Resource: a conversational analysis of elderly talk。Human Development,26,308-319。  new window
12.Huang, Shuanfan(1987)。Two Studies on Prototype Semantics: Sial (Filial Piety), and Mei Mianzi (Loss of Face)。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,15,55-89。  new window
13.Poon, L. W.、Martin, P.、Clayton, G. M.、Messner, S.、Noble, C.、Johnson, M. A.(1992)。The Influences of Cognitive Resources on Adaptation and Old Age。The International Journal of Aging & Human Development,34(1),31-46。  new window
14.Ratner, C.(1996)。Activity as a Key Concept for Cultural Psychology。Culture and Psychology,2,407-434。  new window
15.Ratner, C.(1999)。Three Approaches to Cultural Psychology: A Critique。Cultural Dynamics,11(1),7-31。  new window
16.Ratner, C.(2000)。A Cultural Psychological Analysis of Emotions。Culture and Psychology,6(1),5-39。  new window
17.Thurstone, L. L.(1927)。Psychophysical Analysis。The American Journal of Psychology,38,368-389。  new window
學位論文
1.陳美光(1998)。老人健康生活品質與健康習慣及社會心理因素關係之探討(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rybash, J. M.、Roodin, P. A.、Hoyer, W. J.(1995)。Adult Development and Aging。Madison, MI:WCB Brown and Benchmark。  new window
2.蘇建文、程小危、柯華葳、林見文、吳敏而、幸曼玲、陳李綢、林惠雅、陳淑美(1997)。發展心理學。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐立忠(1989)。老人問題與對策:老人福利服務之探討與設計。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐麗君、蔡文輝(1985)。老年社會學:理論與實務。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.翟學偉(1995)。中國人的臉面觀。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.Brown, Penelope、Levinson, Stephen C.(1987)。Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Alexander, S. N.、Wiley, M. G.(1980)。Situated Activity and Identity Formation。Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology。New York, NY。  new window
8.Kahn, D. R.、Antonuci, T. C.(1981)。Convoys of Social Support: A Life-course Approach。Aging: Social Change。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
9.Stover, L. E.(1974)。The Cultural Ecology of Chinese Civilization。The Cultural Ecology of Chinese Civilization。New York, NY。  new window
10.Thurstone, L. L.(1990)。Intergroup Diplomatic Communication: A Face-negotiation Perspective。Diplomacy and Negotiation。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
單篇論文
1.黃光國(2001)。儒家關係主義與華人臉面觀的分析。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Chou, M. L.(1997)。Protective and Acquisitive Face Orientations in Chinese Social Life Validation Study,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳之昭(1993)。面子心理的理論分析與實際研究。中國人的心理。臺北市:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.金耀基(1986)。面、恥與中國人行為分析。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.周美伶、何友暉(1993)。從跨文化的觀點分析面子的內涵及其在社會交往中的運作。中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇(一九九二)。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ho, D. Y. F.(1994)。Face Dynamics: From Conceptualization to Measurement。The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issues。State University of New York Press。  new window
5.朱瑞玲(1988)。中國人的社會互動:論面子的問題。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱瑞玲(19910000)。「面子」壓力及其因應行為。中國人的心理與行為。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Alexander, C. N.、Rudd, J.(1981)。Situated identities and response variables。Impression management theory and social psychological research。New York:Academic。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE