:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣當代議聘過程之文化與性別意涵分析:一個苗栗客家地區文化展演的觀察
書刊名:傳播與社會學刊
作者:吳翠松 引用關係羅宜青陳羅水
作者(外文):Wu, Tsui-sungLo, I-chingChen, Lo-shui
出版日期:2015
卷期:32
頁次:頁167-208
主題關鍵詞:議聘戲劇論人情和面子理論性別意涵文化展演Betrothal moneyDramaturgicalApproachFace and favor theoryHakkaGender implication
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:930
  • 點閱點閱:229
本研究以高夫曼的「戲劇論」和台灣本土心理學的「人情與面子理論」為基礎,試圖透過苗栗地區議聘過程的觀察,了解蘊涵於其中的文化與性別意涵。在文中研究者選擇了一場男女雙方、親友與媒人皆為客家人的議聘事件做為觀察對象,並於事後訪談相關在場人士。 研究結果發現,整個議聘過程極為迂迴,雙方家長甚少直接對話,金額的協商主要由媒人進行,雙方父親發言都不多,聘金最終金額的決定權是在女方手中。對於雙方家長而言,透過聘金的收取與婚禮的舉行,女兒即為夫家人,某個程度其相關權利亦被交換至夫家。 不過,由於台灣當代的性別平權觀念極為盛行,致使女方家長仍會擔心自己的收聘行為被貼上「賣女兒」標籤,故而在議聘場合中,傳統被要求負責賺錢養家的「父親」就不便表達意見,以免損害其男性尊嚴,改由母親負責表態。總結來說,「聘金」仍深含着牟斯《禮物》一書中所指稱的交換意涵。
This study, drawing on Goffman’s dramaturgical approach and the face and favor theory of indigenous Taiwanese psychology, aimed to explore the cultural and gender implications for the situation of negotiating the betrothal money/gift of Hakka people in Miaoli Country in contemporary Taiwanese society. In this study, we chose one situation of negotiating a betrothal money/gift in which all the participants are Hakka to be the observation field and interviewed all the participants subsequent to the event. The research results revealed that the entire negotiating process was extremely circuitous. Both parents rarely engaged in direct dialogue, with the negotiations for betrothal money amount being carried out mainly by the matchmakers. The groom and bride’s fathers did not express much opinion in this situation, and the final right decision for the amount of betrothal money was determined by the bride’s family. There are several cultural and gender features in the situation of negotiating a betrothal money/gift among the Hakka in contemporary Taiwanese society. Firstly, males and elders have the priority in this event. The better seats for negotiating are occupied by males and elders. Secondly, the bride’s parents usually have the right to decide, because the groom’s parents’ proposal of betrothal money was subject to the consent of the bride’s parents. Thirdly, the fathers of the bride and groom usually did not express any opinion about the amount of the betrothal money From the research results, we found that the patriarchal value system continued to exert a deeply influence on all participants in this event. For both sets of parents, the bride’s rights were also transferred to her husband’s family through the bride price charged and the where the wedding was held. But since the concept of gender equality is extremely popular in contemporary Taiwanese society, the bride’s parents were worried about their behavior in accepting betrothal money being labeled as an act of “selling the daughter,” especially for the bride’s father. This is because, in traditional Chinese society, the role of “father” is to be responsible for making money to be able to support his family, therefore the behavior of accepting betrothal money will damage his male dignity. So the bride’s father prefers to keep silent and defer to her mother to express an opinion in this situation.
期刊論文
1.江文慈(20120300)。大學生人際互動情緒表達壓抑的探究。教育心理學報,43(3),657-679。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鈴媚、沈錦惠、曹開明(20140100)。網路傳播社會中的「電子符號行動者」:從臺灣國光石化案重構閱聽人之主體性。傳播與社會學刊,27,101-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Parish, William L.、Willis, Robert J.(1993)。Daughters, Education, and Family Budgets: Taiwan Experiences。The Journal of Human Resources,28(4),863-898。  new window
4.Waksler, F. C.(1989)。Erving Goffman's sociology: An introductory essay。Human Studies,12(1/2),1-18。  new window
5.Mulder, M. B.(1995)。Bride wealth and its correlates: Quantifying changes over time。Current Anthropology,36(4),573-603。  new window
6.Dekker, M.、Hans H.(2002)。Bride Wealth and Household Security in Rural Zimbabwe。Journal of African Economics,11(1),114-145。  new window
7.Collins, R.(1986)。The passing of intellectual generations: Reflections on the deathof Erving Goffman。Sociological Theory,4(1),106-113。  new window
8.Anderson, S.(2007)。The economics of dowry and brideprice。Journal of Economic Perspective,21(4),151-174。  new window
9.Botticini, M.、Siow, A.(2003)。Why dowries?。American Economic Review,93(4),1385-1398。  new window
10.鍾獨安(2008)。婚姻支付再反思。中國農業大學學報(社會科學版),25(2),109-120。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳煜(2011)。六十年婚嫁禮儀演變。決策與信息,316,61-62。  延伸查詢new window
12.Yan, Yunxiang(1996)。The Culture of Guanxi in a North China Village。The China Journal,35(1),1-25。  new window
13.Schieffelin, E. L.(2005)。Moving performance to text: Can performance be transcribed。Oral Tradition,20(1),80-92。  new window
14.馬慶強(1993)。The Relation of Altruistic Orientation to Human Relationships and Situational Factors in Chinese Children。Journal of Genetic Psychology,154(1),85-96。  new window
15.徐玉青、卓紋君(20030600)。訂婚情侶衝突與因應歷程分析。諮商輔導文粹,8,61-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃懿慧(20010700)。公共關係之「關係」研究--研究方向的省思與展望。廣告學研究,17,21-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Walder, A. G.(1983)。Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industry。The Journal of Asian Studies,43(1),51-76。  new window
18.黃懿慧(20021200)。「關係取向」理論模式初探:組織與利益關係人關係之探討。本土心理學研究,18,95-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃丞儀(20020900)。「金水嬸」的處分權主義--法律的文化研究初探。思與言,40(3),149-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.胡先縉(1944)。The Chinese Concepts of 'Face'。American Anthropologist,46(1),45-64。  new window
21.莊耀嘉、楊國樞(19970600)。角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究,7,282-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(20130325)。歷年15歲以上民間人口之教育程度。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部南部產業發展推動辦公室(20130930)。第三季地區產業產經動態綜合分析--失業率。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李嘉莉(2007)。婚約法律史之研究--主論聘金(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.戴炎輝、戴東雄(200405)。親屬法。台北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bauman, Richard(1977)。Verbal Art as Performance。Prospect Heights, IL:Waveland Press。  new window
3.Burke, Kenneth(1950)。A Rhetoric of Motives。University of California Press。  new window
4.行政院主計處(2010)。社會指標統計年報2009。行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mitchell, J. N.(1978)。Social exchange, dramaturgy and ethnomethodology: Toward a paradigmatic synthesis。New York:Elsevier。  new window
6.Gao, G.、Ting-Toomey, S.(1998)。Communicating effectively in multiculturalcontexts: Communicating effectively with the Chinese。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Gies, F.(1989)。Marriage and the family in the middle ages。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
8.Ebrey, P. B.(1993)。The inner quarter: Marriage and the lives of Chinese womenin the Sung period。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
9.Chang, H.-C.(2010)。Clever, creative, modest: The Chinese language practice。Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press。  new window
10.高夫曼、徐薑敏、李姚軍(1992)。日常生活中的自我展演。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
11.Singer, Milton B.(1972)。When A Great Tradition Modernizes: An Anthropological Approach to Indian Civilization。New York。  new window
12.胡榮、王小章、Mead, George Herbert(1995)。心靈、自我與社會:從社會行為主義者的觀點出發。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳介玄(1994)。協力網路與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。台北:聯經圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Goffman, Erving(1967)。Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior。New York:Doubleday Anchor。  new window
15.Goffman, Ervin(1959)。The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life。New York:Doubleday Anchor。  new window
16.陳運棟(199605)。臺灣的客家禮俗。臺北:臺原出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃光國(20090000)。儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.張朝,朱建豪(20130605)。「全國聘禮地圖」微博走紅,網友直呼「娶不起」,http://news.sohu.com/20130605/n378007752.shtml, 2014/07/29。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李亦園(1995)。傳統中國價值與中國人健康行為特性。華人的心理與治療。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.Schneider, J.(1985)。Trousseau as treasure: Some contradictions of late Nineteenth-Century change in sicily。The marriage bargain: Women and dowries in European history。New York:Institute for Research in History, and Haworth Press。  new window
4.Mulder, M. B.(1988)。Kipsigis bridewealth payments。Human reproductive behaviour: A darwinian perspective。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Lambiri-Dimaki, J.(1985)。Dowry in modern greece: An Institution at the crossroads between persistence and decline。The Marriage bargain: Women and dowries in European history。New York:Institute for Research in History, and Haworth Press.。  new window
6.Goody, J.(1973)。Bride wealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia。Bride wealth and dowry。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Collins, R.(1988)。Theoretical continuities in Goffman's work。Erving Goffman。Cambridge, UK:Polity Press。  new window
8.何翠萍(1991)。禮物、人情、債--舊社會禮物交換形式。禮物:舊社會中交換的形式與功能。台北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.周美伶、何友暉(1993)。從跨文化的觀點分析面子的內涵及其在社會交往中的運作。中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇(一九九二)。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.喬健(1982)。關係芻議。社會及行為科學研究的中國化。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Ting-Toomey, Stella(1988)。Intercultural Conflict Styles: A Face-negotiation Theory。Theories in Intercultural Communication。Sage。  new window
12.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理--理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE