:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:貧窮測量對貧窮人口組成之影響:預算標準之訂定與模擬
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:何華欽 引用關係王德睦 引用關係呂朝賢 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Hua-chinWang, Te-muLeu, Chao-hsien
出版日期:2003
卷期:27
頁次:頁67-104
主題關鍵詞:貧窮測量貧窮門檻基準門檻預算標準法Poverty measurementPoverty thresholdInitial thresholdBudget standard approach
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:353
  • 點閱點閱:88
貧窮測量是針對各種家庭、人口、地區等等進行經濟福祉的比較,其目的是將焦點集中在社會處境較差的人群身上,重視他們的經濟福祉。另外,從公共政策的觀點來看,政策與制度的施行需要評估成果,而貧窮測量的主要目的是讓我們評估政策與制度的效果,去確認人群的最基本經濟需求是否達到滿足。近二十年來官方公佈的官訂貧窮率均不及百分之一,許多學者認為過於嚴苛。本文嘗試模擬各種預算標準法,尋求合宜的貧窮門檻,並討論對於貧窮人口組成的影響。經過本文的模擬設定,貧民率約在3.37% 至4.86% 之間,其貧戶率約在4.39% 至5.76% 之間。進一步分析發現,女性家戶長離婚或寡居者、女性家戶長屬於六十歲以上老人家戶者、女性家戶長屬於單身家戶者、戶長年齡二十歲以下與六十歲以上小戶量 (單身或雙人) 家戶者,在各項貧窮定義下較易落入貧窮。
Poverty measurements are ways to assess the relative economic well-being of different household types, subpopulations and geographic regions of a society. The main objective of this study is to seek ways to correct potential biases against the welfare benefit of the disadvantaged groups. In addition, it is very crucial to assess the effectiveness of the public policies and the relevant institutions. In the meantime, it is also necessary to investigate whether the objectives of public policies have been achieved. The poverty measurements formulated in this study will enable us to assess the effectiveness of public policies and institutions and help us determine whether the basic economic needs are met of various households, subpopulations and regions. In the past twenty years, official poverty rates were all below one percentage point. A substantial body of poverty research considered the poverty thresholds too stringent. The present paper is an attempt to use various estimates to simulate more appropriate poverty thresholds and to explore their effects on the composition of poverty population. In this study, the results of various simulated poverty thresholds show that individual level of poverty rates falls somewhere between 3.37% and 4.86%; while household level of poverty rates lies around 4.39% and 5.76%. Further analyses indicate that female-headed households, of which householders are divorced/windowed or sixty years older; and that households headed by persons less than twenty years or over sixty years or single person, are more likely to fall below poverty thresholds under all measures.
期刊論文
1.Sen, Amartya(1976)。Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement。Econometrica,44(2),219-231。  new window
2.呂朝賢(19960900)。貧窮女性化與貧窮程度的性別差異。人文及社會科學集刊,8(2),221-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林美伶、王德睦(200009)。貧窮門檻對貧窮率與貧窮人口組成之影響。臺灣社會福利學刊,1,93-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Piachaud, David(1987)。Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Poverty。Journal of Social Policy,16(2),147-164。  new window
5.Orshansky, Mollie(1965)。Counting the poor: Another look at the poverty profile。Social Security Bulletin,28(7),3-29。  new window
6.Renwick, Trudi J.、Bergmann, Barbara R.(1993)。A budget-based definition of poverty: With an application to single-parent families。The Journal of Human Resources,28(1),1-24。  new window
7.Watts, Harold W.(1980)。Special Panel Suggests Changes in BLS Family Budget Program。Monthly Labor Review,103(12),3-10。  new window
8.羅紀瓊(19840900)。臺灣地區家庭部門的消費型態:線型對數支出體系與多項式對數函數之比較。經濟論文,12(2),17-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王金利(19940900)。總合近似理想需求體系、等成員人數與臺灣家戶福利水準。臺灣銀行季刊,45(3),259-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王正(19940100)。社會救助、家庭人口規模與貧窮水準測定之研究。經社法制論叢,13,69-87。  延伸查詢new window
11.萬育維(19920400)。貧窮問題與社會救助之間的關係探討:臺北市、高雄市低收入戶界定標準與社會救助措施之比較研究。輔仁學誌. 法管理學院之部,24,107-156。  延伸查詢new window
12.呂朝賢(19990600)。社會救助問題:政策目的、貧窮的定義與測量。人文及社會科學集刊,11(2),233-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李淑容(19960300)。由中美貧窮線現制之檢討論我國貧窮線之研擬。東吳社會工作學報,2,161-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王金利(1986)。人口屬性的引入與恩格爾函數的擴張。臺灣經濟金融月刊,22(7),64-74。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡宏昭(1990)。從生活水準理論探討生活保護措施。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,5(3),109-130。  延伸查詢new window
16.Fuchs, V.(1967)。Redefining Poverty and Redistributing Income。The Public Interest,8,88-95。  new window
17.Hagenaars, A.、De Vos, K.(1988)。The definition and measurement of poverty。The Journal of Human Resources,23(2),211-221。  new window
18.Smeeding, T.(1986)。Luxembourg Income Study。The Journal of Human Resources,21(4),638-643。  new window
研究報告
1.Garner, T. I.、Paulin, G.、Shipp, S.、Short, K.、Nelson, C.、BLS、Census Bureau(1997)。Experimental poverty measurement for the 1990's。Washington, DC。  new window
學位論文
1.呂朝賢(1998)。臺灣的貧窮問題(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃乃凡(1995)。台灣貧窮女性化的探討:女性戶長家戶貧窮現象之貫時性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳銀錄(1987)。貧窮指數的因素分解研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫健忠(2002)。台灣社會救助制度實施與建構之研究。臺北:時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部社會司(1997)。社會救助法。臺北:內政部社會司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bradshaw, Jonathan(1993)。Budget Standards for the United Kingdom。Avebury:Aldershot。  new window
4.Rowntree, B. Seebohm(1901)。Poverty: A Study of Town Life。London:Thomas Nelson and Sons。  new window
5.林萬億、李淑容、王永慈(1995)。我國社會救助政策之研究。臺北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alcock, Pete(1997)。Understanding Poverty。MacMillan Press Ltd。  new window
7.Ruggles, Patricia(1990)。Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and Their Implications for Public Policy。Washington, DC:The Urban Institute Press。  new window
8.Citro, Constance F.、Michael, Robert T.(1995)。Measuring Poverty: A New Approach。Washington, D.C.:National Academies Press。  new window
9.孫健忠(1995)。臺灣地區社會救助政策發展之研究。時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.林萬億(19940000)。福利國家:歷史比較的分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃進豐(1990)。改進當前社會救助措施之研究。改進當前社會救助措施之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱雲鵬(1987)。貧窮問題之探討:臺灣地區資料之因素分解研究。貧窮問題之探討:臺灣地區資料之因素分解研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳琇惠(1986)。訂定貧窮線之方徑與標準的探討。訂定貧窮線之方徑與標準的探討。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1998)。Low Cost but Acceptable: A Minimum Income Standard for the UK。Low Cost but Acceptable: A Minimum Income Standard for the UK。United Kingdom。  new window
15.Yu, A. C. S.(1993)。The low cost budget。Budget Standards for the United Kingdom。Aldershot, UK。  new window
其他
1.Watts, H. W.(1993)。A review of alternative budget-based expenditure norms,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.王德睦、呂朝賢(1997)。人口老化與貧窮率。人口老化與老年照護。中華民國人口學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE