:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:共識與歧見:夫妻配對研究的重要性
書刊名:臺灣社會學
作者:簡文吟伊慶春 引用關係
作者(外文):Chien, Wen-yinYi, Chin-chun
出版日期:2004
卷期:7
頁次:頁89-122
主題關鍵詞:配對資料聚合觀點歧異觀點家庭研究分析單位Couple dataConvergence perspectiveDivergence perspectiveUnit of analysis in family study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:234
  • 點閱點閱:77
     本文試圖檢討夫妻配對樣本的重要性,由分析516對夫妻在不同層次問題的答案岐異程度,討論臺灣家庭研究是否需要夫妻配對資料這個最根本的問題,並檢視支撐量化調查的部份預設。 研究結論包括:一、妻子與丈夫對於家庭客觀事實的回答雖高度一致、卻非完全相同,過往認為不論誰回答都會獲得相同答案的假定需是勘酌。二、透過受訪者蒐集配偶教育程度等資訊,雖有高可信度,卻也有風險。三、丈夫與妻子對性別角色態度看法的共識度偏低,研究觀念岐異如何影響婚姻關係是可努力的方向。四、以不具夫妻關係的男性和女性做為家庭研究單位,無法完全取代配對資料。五、不論是家務分工或家庭決策,夫妻答案都存在岐見,且不一致程度隨題目性質不同而異,仰賴一人陳述的家庭研究,無可避免存在偏誤。 本文也應用岐異觀點於夫妻關係研究,結果指出夫妻價值觀差異越大,越傾向不滿意家庭重大事項決策方式。總之,夫妻態度與認知歧異是臺灣家庭普遍特徵之一,對臺灣社會來說,考察夫妻配對研究有理論與實務的必要。
     The question of whether to use conjugal pairs in family studies is necessary in Taiwan is examined. According to 516 randomly selected couples in the 1994 island-wide study entitled "The Economic Development and Female's Family Status: Family Structure, Female's Employment, and Family Power Structure in Taiwan", responses to three topics-factual data of the family background, sex-role attitudes, household division of labor and the most important family decision item-were analyzed to determine the degree of consensus/discrepancy between spouses. Results show that the greatest degree of discrepancy was for sex-role attitudes and the least for factual family data. The discrepancy of family factual information between spouses pointed out that the common practice of using one spouse's answer in gathering family demographic data has the risk of data validity. Findings regarding household division of labor and family decision-making show that discrepant answers exist in all items and vary according to different items raised. The lower level of spousal consensus regarding sex-role attitudes was further analyzed. It was shown that couples' different attitudes significantly affect the satisfaction level toward family decision-making. The findings indicate that although the amount of consensus among couples is generally greater than that of discrepancy, bias still exists if only answers from one spouse are relied, especially regarding family values and attitudes. Since conjugal discrepancy has become a feature of Taiwanese families, it is suggested that future family studies make greater efforts to include responses from both spouses when studying the marital interaction in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Teachman, J. D.、Carver, K.、Day, R.(1995)。A Model for the Analysis of Paired Data。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57,1011-1024。  new window
2.陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕(20001200)。婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例。臺灣社會學刊,24,1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina(1970)。The Study of Family Power Structure: A Review 1960-1969。Journal of Marriage and the Family,32(4),539-552。  new window
4.Deal, J. E.(1995)。Utilizing Data From Multiple Family Members: A Within-Family Approach。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(4),1109-1121。  new window
5.Fisher, L.、Kokes, R. F.、Ransom, D. C.、Phillips, S. L.、Rudd, P.(1985)。Alternative strategies for creating "relational" family data。Family Process,24(2),213-224。  new window
6.Thompson, L.、Walker, A. J.(1982)。The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues。Journal of Marriage and the Family,44(4),889-900。  new window
7.Spanier, G. B.、Lewis, R. A.(1980)。Marital quality: a review of the seventies。Journal of Marriage and the Family,42(4),825-839。  new window
8.Thomson, E.、Williams, R.(1982)。Beyond wives' family sociology: A method for analyzing couple data。Journal of Marriage and the Family,44,999-1008。  new window
9.伊慶春(19910700)。臺北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,1(2),151-173。  延伸查詢new window
10.伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲(19921200)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王舒芸、余漢儀(19970400)。奶爸難為--雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊,8,115-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春(20001200)。家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?。臺灣社會學刊,24,59-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.唐先梅(19991200)。從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工。應用心理研究,4,131-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.孔祥明(19991200)。婆媳過招為哪樁?:婆婆、媳婦與兒子(丈夫)三角關係的探討。應用心理研究,4,57-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Landis, J. Richard、Koch, Gary G.(1977)。The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data。Biometrics,33(1),159-174。  new window
16.Cohen, Jacob(1960)。A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales。Educational and Psychological Measurement,20(1),37-46。  new window
17.Booth, A.、Welch, S.(1978)。Spousal Consensus and its Correlates: A Reassessment。Journal of Marriage and the Family,40,23-32。  new window
18.Centers, R.、Raven, B.、Rodrigues, A.(1971)。Conjugal Power Structure: A Re-Examination。American Journal of Sociology,36,264-278。  new window
19.Card, J. J.(1978)。The Correspondence of Data Gathered from Husband and Wife: Implications for Family Planning Studies。Social Biology,25(3),196-204。  new window
20.DeMaris, A.(2001)。The Influence of Intimate Violence on Transitions out of Cohabitation。Journal of Marriage and the Family,63,235-246。  new window
21.Douglas, S. P.、Wind, Y.(1978)。Examining Family Role and Authority Patterns: Two Methodological Issues。Journal of Marriage and the Family,40,35-47。  new window
22.Heer, D. M.(1962)。Husband and Wife Perceptions of Family Power Structure。Marriage and Family Living,24,65-67。  new window
23.Kluwer, E. S.、Heesink, J. A. M.、Van De Vliert, E.(1997)。The Marital Dynamics of Conflict over the Divison of Labor。Journal of Marriage and the Family,59(3),635-653。  new window
24.Ochs, E. P.、Binik, Y. M.(1999)。The Use of Couple Data Determine the Reliability of Self-Reported Sexual Behavior。The Journal of Sex Research,36(4),374-384。  new window
25.O'Rourke, M. E.、Germino, B. B.(2000)。From Two Perspectives to One Choice: Blending Couple and Individual Views of Prostate Cancer Treatment Selection。Journal of Family Nursing,6(3),231-251。  new window
26.Pimentel, E. E.(2000)。Just How Do I Love Thee?: Marital Relations in Urban China。Journal of Marriage and the Family,62,32-47。  new window
27.Price-Bonham, S.(1977)。Marital Decision Making: Congruence of Spouses' Responses。Journal of Marriage and the Family,47,119-126。  new window
28.Quarm, D.(1981)。Random Measurement Error as a Source of Discrepancies Between the Reports of Wives and Husbands Concerning Marital Power and Task Allocation。Journal of Marriage and the Family,43。  new window
29.Safilios-Rothschild, C.(1969)。Family Sociology or Wives' Family Sociology? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Decision-Making。Journal of Marriage and the Family,31,290-301。  new window
30.Szinovacz, M. E.(1983)。Using Couple Data as a Methodological Tool: The Case of Marital Violence。Journal of Marriage and the Family,45,633-644。  new window
31.Szinovacz, M. E.、Egley, L. C.(1995)。Comparing One-Partner Couple Data on Sensitive Marital Behaviors: The Case of Marital Violence。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57,995-1100。  new window
32.Thomson, E.、McDonald, E.、Bumpass, L. L.(1990)。Fertility Desires and Fertility: Hers, His and Theirs。Demography,273(4),579-588。  new window
33.Walters, L.、Pittamn, J.、Norrell, E.(1984)。Development of a Quantitative Measure of a Family from Self-reports of Family Members。Journal of Family Issues,5,497-514。  new window
研究報告
1.伊慶春、呂玉瑕(1996)。經濟發展與婦女家庭地位:臺灣的家庭結構、婦女就業型態與家庭權力結構之關聯 (計畫編號:NSC83-0301-H-001-064)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.伊慶春(1987)。夫妻權力與婚姻調適之研究:初步分析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Baggzzi, R. P.、Van Loo, M.(1981)。Decision-making and Fertility: A Theory of Exchange in the Family。Demographic Behavior: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Decision-Making。Boulder, CO。  new window
圖書論文
1.伊慶春、蔡瑤玲(1989)。台北地區夫妻權力的分析:以家庭決策為例。台灣社會現象的分析:家庭、人口、政策與階層。臺北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.伊慶春、楊文山(1992)。The Perceives Conflict and Decision Making Patterns among Husbands and Wives in Taiwan。Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives from East and West。Taipei:Sun Yat-Sen Institute for Social Science and Philosophy, Academia Sinica。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE