:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:奶爸難為--雙薪家庭之父職角色初探
書刊名:婦女與兩性學刊
作者:王舒芸余漢儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Shu-yungYu, Annie Hon-yei
出版日期:1997
卷期:8
頁次:頁115-149
主題關鍵詞:父職角色選擇性育兒角色雙薪核心家庭紮根理論FatherhoodSecondary parenting roleDual-wage familyGrounded theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(64) 博士論文(22) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:64
  • 共同引用共同引用:273
  • 點閱點閱:157
     婦女運動在促進兩性平等上已略有斬獲,使得嚴謹的男主外、女主內的性別分工在形式上開始鬆動,大量婦女走進就業職場。但若進一步檢視就業婦女在家中被期待扮演的照顧者角色,與面臨的衝突時,可清楚看出,男性對家庭角色的投入,並未相稱於雙生涯家庭的變遷與需求,這使得女性不論就業與否,仍得負擔主要的育兒責任,導致兩性在公領域上很難達到真正的平等。可見,要真正解決在兩性之間的不均等育兒責任分擔、減輕雙薪家庭角色緊張對婦女造成的負向影響,並為達到兩性在職場真正的平等,我們都不能忽略對男性在家庭中,尤其是參與兒童照顧活動的「父職角色」的瞭解。 據此,本文所關注的核心現象為:在都會區、雙薪的核心家庭中,育有六歲以下小孩的父親,在夫妻同時外出工作的社會脈絡下,在育兒角色的扮演上,究竟有怎樣的表現與特徵?其心情感受又是如何?這樣的父職角色特徵,到底是哪些社會心理過程、文化意識型態、社會結構、組織與機制在模塑、建構、運作與影響?為追求兩性平等的育兒角色的早日達成,我們該突破哪些障礙、強化哪些支持網絡? 本研究採取質化研究中的紮根理論研究方法,以核心、雙薪、研究期間家中僅育有六歲以下小孩的家庭為訪談對象,從研究者之人際網絡中,完成六對夫妻的訪談,資料蒐集採半結構式的深度訪談。資料分析係依據紮根理論來進行資料的概念化,在發展類屬的過程,掌握其特徵,並發展面向,待核心類屬出現,開始進行選擇性編碼,以核心類屬為中心,建構概念與概念之間的理論性關連,以達成理論性飽合。 本研究發現如下:ぇ就核心現象而言,我們發現:母親即使外出就業,仍是嬰幼兒的主要照者,父親則扮演「選擇性育兒角色」。而其「選擇性」分別具體展現在投入育兒勞務的時間、責任與心態、角色、活動特質、以及親子關係等五個層面;最後,研究也發現,初為人父心情感受可謂苦樂參半。え就影響父職角色扮演的因素而言,則有下列四個重要機制:「意:鬆動的傳統性別分工觀」、「能力:先天不足、後天失調的社會化歷程」、「勞動市場結:相互排擠的工作與親職領域」、「資源:代際關係主導之托育支持網絡」。
     One major goal of feminist movements in Western countries has been the employment equality for women. Although certain degree of success has been accomplished by equal legistations and women employment statistics, given the expected caring role of working-women in the family, the increase in women's employment doesnot guarantee an equivalent increase in men's participation in child-care. That's to say, whether women work or not, they are expected to be the principal child care-giver, particularly for pre-school children. To conclde, if we really want to shatter the rigid gender division of child-care responsibilities, to release the negative impact of the role-conflict on women in dual-wage families, and to achieve the actual gender equity in employment, we have to examine the role of men in families, especially their performance of "fatherhood". Thus, we address the following inquires: what's the current patterns of paternal participation in child care in dual-wage families with pre-school children? What were the mechanics which maintained the gender division of child-care responsibilities? What are the likely psychological, social, and economic barriers and facilitators for co-parenting? Six Taiwan dual-wage families with pre-school children participated in this study. Qualified informants were recruited through personal network, and both parents of each family were visited separately. A semi-structure in-depth interview which lasted from one to two hours were conducted. Based on grounded theory all the interview data were analyzed. The results are: fatherhood as a secondary parenting role, in the sense that fathers spend less time with their children than do mothers, and they involved with children more on weekend and holidays. Besides, they always expressed their willingness to "help" their wives to take care of children instead of perceiving themselves as the main child care-giver. Thirdly, fathers are also more likely than mothers to invest their time with children in the less demanding child-care activities. Mechanics underneath the performance of fatherhood include: cultural norm constraining the nurturing paternal image; rigid gender socialization limiting the male parenting competence; the labor market structure excludes father from adequate parenting.
期刊論文
1.Safilios-Rothschild, C.(1969)。Family Sociology or Wives' Family Sociology? A Cross--Cultural Examination of Decision Making。Journal of Marriage and the Family,31,290-301。  new window
2.徐宗國(19861100)。由田野研究資料建立紮根的理論。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,18,51-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.余漢儀(1995)。親職角色的雙重標準。婦女與兩性研究通訊,34,23。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lamb, M. E.、Pleck, J. H.、Charnov, E.、Levine, J. A.(1985)。Paternal Behaviour in Humans。American Psychologist,25,883-894。  new window
5.Masako, Kshii-Kuntz(1994)。Paternal Involvement and Perception toward Fathers' Role。Journal of Family Issues,15(1),30-48。  new window
6.Russell, Graeme(1978)。The Father Role and its Relation to Macculinity, Femininity and Androgyny。Child Development,49,1174-1181。  new window
7.Volling, Brenda L.、Belsky, Jay(1991)。Multiple Determinants of Father Involvement during Infancy in Dual-Earner and Single-Earner Families。Journal of Marriage and Family,53,461-474。  new window
會議論文
1.王行(1996)。新男性的成長--打破男性優勢的迷思。兩性平等與心理衛生研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.王淑英、賴幸媛(1996)。臺灣的托育困境與國家的角色。女性照顧研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂寶靜、陳景寧(1996)。女性家屬照顧者與福利建構。女性照顧研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭淑華(1995)。兩性角色變遷與親職教育。婦女角色變遷與兒童福利學術研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉梅君(1996)。建構性別敏感的公民權概念:從女性照顧工作本質的探析出發。女性照顧研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐宗國(1994)。紮根理論研究法及其對婦女研究的若干啟示。「社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻」第二次科際研討會。中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.高淑貴、賴爾柔、莊雅萌(1988)。雙生涯家庭親職角色之研究 (計畫編號:NSC75-0301-H002-32F)。台大農推系。  延伸查詢new window
2.莫藜藜、王行(1995)。已婚男性的家庭價值觀及其對家庭的需求之探究--兼論家庭政策之規劃 (計畫編號:NSC84-2411-H-031-002-H3)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃坤瑛(1989)。影響父職角色扮演因素之研究--「雙工作家庭」與「單工作家庭」之比較(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李宜靜(1990)。雙工作家庭家事分工及其影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王慧姚(1981)。已婚職業婦女的角色衝突及其生活滿意度(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.王美惠(1987)。已婚職業婦女之家務分工、性別、角色態度和社會支援與婚姻滿意的研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.戴智慧(1985)。已婚職業婦女的生活壓力與休閒型態、婚姻滿意、生理健康、心理健康及工作滿意五者的關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.林淑英(1991)。顏面傷殘者自我概念與社會適應之研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.周玟琪(1994)。影響台灣地區家務分工因素之探討(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gould, Jonathan W.、Gunther, R. E.、周蔚(1995)。當男人,做爸爸。臺北:麥格羅希爾。  延伸查詢new window
2.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1990)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.余漢儀(1991)。臺灣地區兩性就業狀況之研究。臺北:行政院勞工委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lewis, Charlie(1986)。Becoming a father。Milton Keyness:Open University Press。  new window
5.Wiley-Interscience Kimball, Gayle(1988)。50/50 parenting-Sharing Family Rewards & Responsibilities。Lexington Books。  new window
6.胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Abbott, Pamela、Wallace, Claire、俞智敏、陳光達、陳素梅、張君玫(1995)。女性主義觀點的社會學。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
8.余漢儀(1996)。兒童虐待:現象檢視與問題反思。巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Land, Hilary(1991)。Time to Care。Women's Issues in Social Policy。Routledge。  new window
2.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, J. M.(1994)。Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
3.王麗容(1995)。婦女福利政策。婦女政策白皮書。國民黨婦工會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Daly, Kerry(1992)。The Fit Between Qualitative Research and Characteristics of Families。Qualitative Methods in Family Research。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Leira, Arnlaug(1990)。Coping with Care-Mothers in a Welfare State。Gender and Caring。  new window
6.Leira, Arnlaug(1992)。Models of Motherhood。Welfare States and Working Mothers--The Scandinavian Experience。  new window
7.Miller, Angela Browne(1990)。Who provides Care and Why。The Day Care Dilemma-Critical Concerns for U. S. A. Family。Plenum Press。  new window
8.Moss, P. M.(1980)。Parents at Work。Work and the Family。London。  new window
9.Parke, Ross D.(1985)。Foreword。Dimensions of Fatherhood。Sage Publications。  new window
10.Russell, Graeme(1983)。[The Changing Role of Fathers ] Introduction。The Changing Role of Fathers。University of Queensland Press。  new window
11.Strauss, Anselm(1987)。[Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists] Introduction。Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE