論全球化時代美國與歐體國際結合管制差異與衝突之緩和_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	論全球化時代美國與歐體國際結合管制差異與衝突之緩和
書刊名：	公平交易季刊
作者：	林心怡
作者(外文)：	Lin, Hsin-yi
出版日期：	2005
卷期：	13:2
頁次：	頁101-178
主題關鍵詞：	全球化；國際結合；結合管制；Ge/Honeywell結合案；世界貿易組織；美國反托拉斯法；歐體競爭法；實質降低競爭標準；優勢地位標準；非協調互動效果；單一優勢地位；協調互動行為；單一效果；槓桿效應；組合優勢；範疇效果；鞏固理論；Globalization；International merger；Merger regulation；WTO；U.S. antitrust law；EC competition law；SLC test；Dominance test；Non-coordinated effects；Single dominance；Coordinated interaction；Single effect；Leverage effect；Portfolio power；Range effect；Entrenchment theory
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:31 點閱:69

經濟全球化的同時，也產生了國際性的競爭問題，以傳統的分割的個別國家 (管轄權) 競爭法管制處理這些具有國際性的競爭問題，則不免發生諸多管制衝突與失能的現象。近年來，國際間成立了諸多不同層級的因應模式致力於這些問題的解決，然而，這些努力仍然無法避免衝突的發生：1999年Boeing與McDonnell Douglas以及2001年GE與Honeywell之結合案，皆發生不同國家 (管轄權) 間對同一結合案件審查結果有所歧異之問題，其中，2001年之GE與Honeywell之結合案，甚至導致了美國與歐體間之國際街突。本案也引起了本文的研究動機，這個衝突案件的發生，究竟是否與美國與歐體在結合實體規範之制度面差異有所關連？為了釐清這個問題，本文對於美國與歐體之實體結合規範進行比較，探究其主要差異部分以及形成這些差異的根源，並藉由對於GE/Honeywell一案之分析，驗證補充前述抽象制度比較之結果。最後，本文基於這些差異的形成原因，重新檢討國際問各種因應國際性競爭問題之發展，並試圖對於如何緩和國際結合管制差異以及因此可能產生之衝突問題，提出本文之見解。

以文找文

As the trend toward economic globalization gains increasing momentum, what also emerge are problems associated with international competition. It is undeniable that certain phenomena are highly indicative of the conflicts in and the incapability of existing regulations to handle problems pertaining to “international” competition when individual “national” jurisdictions are employed. For example, both the merger of Boeing and McDonnell Douglas in 1999 and that of GE and Honeywell in 2001 led to considerably different decisions given that they had been based on the jurisdictions of the different countries involved, i.e. those of the U.S. and of the EU. The outcome of the latter case, in particular, sparked a flurry of heated discussions. It is, in fact, the GE/Honeywell case that serves as the motivation behind this research. At question is whether those different decisions had anything to do with the different substantive merger regulations. This paper first reviews the major differences between the substantive merger regulations of the U.S. and the EU and attempts to determine what the root causes of these differences are. In addition, it analyzes that specific case in order to more thoroughly examine the issue and supplement our discussion. Based on the findings, this paper reviews the relevant activities on bilateral, regional, and international levels, which are expected to deal with problems concerning international competition, and it proposes ways in which to mitigate differences between such regulations and ways in which to resolve any possible conflicts that may arise.

以文找文

Other
1.	羅昌發(199404)。貿易與競爭之法律互動。延伸查詢

期刊論文
1.	Landes, W. M.、Posner, R. A.(1981)。Market Power in Antitrust Cases。Harvard Law Review，94。
2.	孫治本(20000300)。全球地方化、民族認同與文明衝突。思與言，38(1)，147-184。延伸查詢
3.	Stigler, George J.(1964)。A Theory of Oligopoly。Journal of Political Economy，72(1)，44-61。
4.	Baker, D.(2000)。Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium: National Merger Enforcement, Transnational Mergers, and the Global Economy: Antitrust Merger Review in an Era of Escalating Cross-Border Transactions and Effects。Wisconsin International Law Journal，18。
5.	Ezrachi, Ariel(2002)。Globalization of Merger Control: A Look at Bilateral Cooperation through the GE/ Honeywell Case。Florida Journal of International Law，14，397-425。
6.	Holbrook, Dane(2002)。Comment: International Merger Control Convergence: Resolving Multijurisdictional Review Problems。UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs，7，345-375。
7.	Jacobs, Michael S.(2000)。Symposium: 'Morph Mania: A Recipe for Mergers and Acquisitions': Foreword: Mergers and Acquisition in a Global Economy: Perspectives from Law, Politics, and the Business。DePaul Business Law Journal，13，1-13。
8.	Kauper, Thomas E.(2000)。Merger Control in the United States and the European Union: Some Observations。St. John's Law Review，74，305-359。
9.	Peterson, Jeffrey M.(2002)。Unrest in the European Commission: The Changing Landscape and Politics of International Mergers for United States Companies。Houston Journal of International Law，24，377-409。
10.	Todino, Mario(2003)。International Competition Network: The State of Play after Naples。World Competition，26(2)，283-302。
11.	Levy, Nicholas(2003)。EU Merger Control: From Birth to Adolescence。World Competition，26(2)，195-218。
12.	Hildebrand, Doris(2002)。The European School in EC Competition Law。World Competition，25(1)，3-23。
13.	Grewlich, Alexandre S.(2001)。Globalisation and Conflict in Competition Law; Elements of Possible Solutions。World Competition，24(3)，367-404。
14.	Fox, Eleanor M.(2003)。We Protect Competition, You Protect Competitors。World Competition，26(2)，149-165。
15.	Akbar, Yusaf(2002)。Grabbing Victory from the Jaws of Defeat: Can the GE/Honeywell Merger Facilitate International Antitrust Policy Co-operation?。World Competition，25(4)，403-422。
16.	McGinnis, John O.(2003)。The Political Economy of International Antitrust Harmonization。William and Mary Law Review，45(2)，549-594。
17.	Fox, Eleanor M.(2003)。International Antitrust and the Doha Dome。Virginia Journal of International Law，43(4)，911-932。
18.	Alford, Roger P.(1993)。The Extraterritorial Application of Antitrust Laws: A Postscript on Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California。Virginia Journal of International Law，34(1)。
19.	Sugden, William(2002)。Global Antitrust and the Evolution of an International Standard。Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law，35(3)，989-1020。
20.	Swaine, Edward T.(2002)。Competition, Not Competitors,' Nor Canards: Ways of Criticizing the Commission。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(3)，597-635。
21.	Stock, Eric J.(1999)。Explaining the Differing U.S. and EU Positions on the Boeing/Mcdonnell-Douglas Merger: Avoiding Another Near-miss。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，20(4)，825-909。
22.	Schmitz, Stefan(2002)。The European Commission's Decision in GE/Honeywell and the Question of the Goals of Antitrust Law。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(3)，539-595。
23.	Schmitz, Stefan(2002)。How Dare They? European Merger Control and the European Commission's Blocking of the General Electric/Honeywell Merger。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(2)，325-383。
24.	Kolasky, William J.(2002)。GE/Honeywell: Continuing the Transatlantic Dialog。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(3)，513-537。
25.	Giotakos, Dimitri(2002)。GE/Honeywell: A Theoretic Bundle Assessing Conglomerate Mergers across the Atlantic。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(3)，469-511。
26.	Fox, Eleanor M.(2002)。Mergers in Global Markets: GE/Honeywell and the Future of Merger Control。University of Pennsylvania. Journal of International Law，23(3)，457-468。
27.	Stevens, Sarah(2002)。The Increased Aggression of the EC Commission in Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Merger Regulation and Its Impact on Transatlantic Cooperation in Antitrus。Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce，29(2)，263-302。
28.	Dam, Kenneth W.(1993)。Extraterritoriality in an Age of Globalization: The Hartford Fire Case。Supreme Court Review，1993。
29.	Berry, Mark N.(1996)。Efficiencies and Horizontal Mergers: In Search of a Defense。San Diego Law Review，33(2)，515-554。
30.	Greaney, Thomas L.(2000)。Not for Import: Why the EU Should not Adopt the American Efficiency Defense for Analyzing Mergers and Joint Ventures。Saint Louis University Law Journal，44。
31.	Mary, James(1989)。Antitrust in the Formative Era: Political and Economic Theory in Constitutional and Antitrust Analysis, 1880-1918。Ohio State Law Journal，50。
32.	Jin, Paul(2002)。Turning Competition on its Head: Economic Analysis of the EC's Decision to Bar the GE-Honeywell Merger。Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business，23(1)，187-212。
33.	Guzman, Andrew T.(1998)。Is International Antitrust Possible?。New York University Law Review，73(5)，1501-1548。
34.	Wood, Diane P.(1999)。Is Cooperation Possible?。New England Law Review，34(1)，103-112。
35.	Weintraub, Russell J.(1999)。Globalization's Effect on Antitrust Law。New England Law Review，34(1)，27-38。
36.	Renzi, Lisa M.(2003)。The GE/Honeywell Merger: Catalyst in the Transnational Conglomerate Merger Debate。New England Law Review，37(1)，109-146。
37.	Renzi, Lisa M.(2003)。Comment: The GE/Honeywell Merger: Catalyst in the Conglomerate Merger Debate。New England Law Review，37(1)。
38.	Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich(1999)。Legal, Economic and Political Objectives of National and International Competition Policies: Constitutional Functions of WTO "Linking Principles" for Trade and Competition。New England Law Review，34(1)，145-162。
39.	Griffin, Joseph P.(1999)。What Business People Want from a World Antitrust Code。New England Law Review，34(1)，39-45。
40.	Gerber, David J.(1999)。The U.S.-European Conflict over the Globalization of Antitrust Law: A Legal Experience Perspective。New England Law Review，34(1)，123-144。
41.	Fox, Eleanor M.(1999)。Global Problems in a World of National Law。New England Law Review，34(1)，11-14。
42.	Bellamy, Honorable Christopher(1999)。Some Reflections on Competition Law in the Global Market。New England Law Review，34(1)，15-20。
43.	Bellamy, Honorable Christopher(1999)。How Far Can We Harmonize?。New England Law Review，34(1)，173-174。
44.	Snyder, David(1997)。Mergers and Acquisitions in the European Community and the United States: A Movement toward a Uniform Enforcement Body?。Law and Policy in International Business，29。
45.	Takigawa, Toshiaki(2002)。Harmonization of Competition Laws after Doha Substantive and Procedural Harmonization。Journal of World Trade，36(6)，1111-1124。
46.	Hamner, Kenneth J.(2002)。The Globalization of Law: International Merger Control and Competition Law in the United States, The European Union, Latin America and China。Journal of Transnational Law & Policy，11(2)，385-405。
47.	Lanucara, Lucio(2002)。The Globalization of Antitrust Enforcement: Governance Issues and Legal Responses。Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies，9(2)，433-459。
48.	Rivers, Ricky D.(2003)。General Electric/Honeywell Merger: European Commission Antitrust Decision Strikes a Sour Note。ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law，9(3)，525-540。
49.	Dodge, William S.(1998)。Extraterritoriality and Conflict-of-laws Theory: An Argument for Judicial Unilateralism。Harvard International Law Journal，39(1)，101-170。
50.	Smitherman, Charles W., III(2004)。The Future of Global Competition Governance: Lessons from the Transatlantic。American University International Law Review，19(4)，769-882。
51.	Karpel, Amy Ann(1998)。Comment: The European Commission's Decision on the Boeing-Mcdonnell Douglas Merger and the Need for Greater U.S.-EU Cooperation in the Merger Field。American University Law Review，47(4)，1029-2069。
52.	Piraino, Thomas A.(2003)。A New Approach to the Antitrust Analysis of Mergers。Boston University Law Review，83(4)，785-852。
53.	Fanto, James A.(2001)。Braking the Merger Momentum: Reforming Corporate law Governing Mega-mergers。Buffalo Law Review，49(1)，249-358。
54.	Eberhart, Stacy L.(2001)。Extraterritorial Merger Regulation: Polices, Problems and a Proposal Explored through the Planned Dow Chemical and Union Carbide Merger。Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law，9(1)。
55.	Wood, Diane P.(2002)。International Harmonization of Antitrust Law: The Tortoise or the Hare?。Chicago Journal of International Law，3(2)，391-407。
56.	Fiebig, Andre R.(1999)。The Extraterritorial Application of the Euroepan Merger Control Regulation。Columbia Journal of European Law，5(1)，79-100。
57.	Kanarek, David A.(2002)。Book Review: Antitrust Goes Global。Columbia Journal of European Law，8(1)，141-144。
58.	Watt, Horatia Muir(2003)。Choice of Law in Integrated and Interconnected Markets: A Matter of Political Economy。Columbia Journal of European Law，9(3)，383-409。
59.	Holland, Erin E.(2003)。Using Merger Review to Cure Prior Conduct: The European Commission's GE/Honeywell Decision。Columbia Law Review，103(1)，74-110。
60.	Gerard, Damien(2003)。Merger Control Policy: How to Give Meaningful Consideration to Efficiency Claims?。Common Market Law Review，40(6)，1367-1412。
61.	Völcker, Sven B.(2003)。Leveraging as a Theory of Competitive Harm in EU Merger Control。Common Market Law Review，40(3)，581-614。
62.	Rooney, William H.、Park, David K.(2003)。Recent Developments in Four Areas of Antitrust Law: Merger Enforcement, Criminal Enforcement and Health Care Intiatives; Exclusionary Conduct; and the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine and State Action Immunity。Columbia Business Law Review，2003(2)。
63.	Ruffner, Thomas L.(2003)。The Failed GE/Honeywell Merger: The Return of Portfolio-effects Theory?。DePaul Law Review，52(4)，1285-1333。
64.	Foster, Sharon E.(2001)。While America Slept: The Harmonization of Competition Laws Based Upon the European Union Model。Emory International Law Review，15(2)，467-520。
65.	McChesney, Fred S.(2003)。Talking 'Bout My Antitrust Generation: Competition for and in the Field of Competition Law。Emory Law Journal，52(3)，1401-1438。
66.	Boge, Ulf、Muller, Edith(2002)。From the Market Dominance Test to the SLC Test: Are There Any Reasons for a Change?。ECLR: European Competition Law Review，23(10)，495-498。
67.	Noël, Pierre-Emmanuel(1997)。Efficiency Considerations in the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under European and U.S. Antitrust Law。ECLR: European Competition Law Review，18(8)，498-519。
68.	Selvam, Vijay S. V.(2004)。The EC Merger Control Impasse: Is There a Solution to This Predicament?。ECLR，25(1)，52-67。
69.	Drauz, Gotz(2002)。Unbundling Ge/Honeywell: The Assessment of Conglomerate Mergers under EC Competition Law。Fordham International Law Journal，25(4)，885-908。
70.	Evans, David S.、Salinger, Michael(2002)。Competition Thinking at the European Commission: Lessons from the Aborted GE/Honeywell Merger。George Mason Law Review，10(3)，489-532。
71.	Valentine, Debra A.(1998)。Building a Cooperative Framework for Oversight in Mergers - The Answer to Extraterritorial Issues in Merger Review。George Mason Law Review，6(3)，525-532。
72.	Kolasky, William J.(2002)。Conglomerate Mergers and Range Effect: It's Long Way from Chicago to Brussels。George Mason Law Review，10(3)，533-550。
73.	Fox, Eleanor M.(2002)。U.S. and European Merger Policy - Fault Lines and Bridges - Mergers That Create Incentives for Exclusionary Practices。George Mason Law Review，10(3)，471-488。
74.	Luz, Kathleen(1999)。The Boeing-McDonnell Douglas Merger: Competition Law, Parochialism, and the Need for a Globalized Antitrust System。George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics，32。

會議論文
1.	Pitofsky, R.(2000)。EU and U. S. Approaches to International Mergers-Views from the U. S. Federal Trade commission。沒有紀錄。
2.	Kovacic, William E.(2003)。Extraterritoriality, Institutions, and Convergence in International Competition Policy。0。
3.	Muris, Timothy J.(2001)。Merger Enforcement in a World of Multiple Arbiters。0。
4.	Leary, Thomas B.(2001)。A Comment on Merger Enforcement in the United States and in the European Union。0。
5.	(2003)。Speech by Mr. Mario Monti European Commission for Competition Policy。0。

研究報告
1.	王連常福、何之邁、蕭富山、王錦慧(1994)。歐美管制結合之研究暨我國對結合規範之檢討。臺北市。延伸查詢
2.	楊清文(1983)。美國反托拉斯法對事業結合之規範。0。延伸查詢
3.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2003)。Substantive Criteria Used for the Assessment of the Mergers。0。
4.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2001)。Portfolio Effects in Conglomerate Mergers。0。
5.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1996)。Competition Policy and Efficiency Claims in Horizontal Agreements。0。
6.	Bundeskartellamt(2001)。Prohibition Criteria in Merger Control - Dominant Position versus Substantial Lessening of Competition?。0。

學位論文
1.	陳秋華(1998)。國際結合在競爭法中之規範問題(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。延伸查詢
2.	洪榮宗(1997)。跨國結合競爭規範之衝突與解決，沒有紀錄。延伸查詢
3.	梁禺山(1996)。歐洲共同體企業結合管制規則之研究，0。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Lindsay, A.(2003)。The EC Merger Regulation: Substantive Issues。London：Sweet & Maxwell。
2.	Gerber, David J.(1998)。Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus。Clarendon Press。
3.	Jackson, John H.、Sykes, Alan O.、Davey, William J.(2002)。Legal problems of international economic relations : cases, materials, and text on the national and international regulation of transnational economic relations。St. Paul, Minn：West Publishing Company。
4.	Posner, Richard A.(2001)。Antitrust Law。University of Chicago Press。
5.	Bork, Robert H.(1978)。The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself。New York：Free Press。
6.	Giddens, Anthony(1985)。The Nation-State and Violence。Polity Press。
7.	Trebilcock, Michael J.、Howse, Robert(1999)。The Regulation of International TRADE。Routledge。
8.	Friedman, Thomas L.、蔡繼光、李振昌、霍達文(2000)。了解全球化：凌志汽車與橄欖樹。台北：聯經。延伸查詢
9.	Stiglitz, Joseph E.、李明(2002)。全球化的許諾與失落。台北：大塊。延伸查詢
10.	Cook, C. J.、Kerse, C. S.(2000)。E. C. Merger Control。E. C. Merger Control。London, UK。
11.	Pearlstein, Debra J.(2002)。Antitrust Law Developments。Antitrust Law Developments。Chicago, IL。
12.	Armentano, Dominick T.(1996)。Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure。Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure。Oakland, CA。
13.	Bannerman, Edward(2002)。The Future of EU Competition Policy。The Future of EU Competition Policy。London, UK。
14.	Thompson, Samuel C., Jr.(1997)。A Practitioner's Guide to the Economics of the Antitrust Merger Guidelines。A Practitioner's Guide to the Economics of the Antitrust Merger Guidelines。Philadelphia, PA。
15.	Hylton, Keith N.、Hylton, K. N.(2003)。Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution。Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution。Cambridge, UK。
16.	Anderson, William R.、Rogers, C. Paul, III(1999)。Antitrust Law: Policy and Practice。Antitrust Law: Policy and Practice。New York, NY。
17.	(Matthew Bender、Company, Inc.)(2003)。Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation: Primary Source Pamphlet。Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation: Primary Source Pamphlet。Newark, NJ。
18.	OECD Committee of Experts on Restrictive Business Practices(1984)。Competition and Trade Policies: Their Interaction。Competition and Trade Policies: Their Interaction。0。
19.	Goyder, D. G.(2003)。EC Competition Law。EC Competition Law。New York, NY。
20.	Lane, Robert(2000)。EC Competition Law。London：Pearson Education Ltd.。
21.	(2003)。Merger Control in Europe: EU, Member States and Accession States。Merger Control in Europe: EU, Member States and Accession States。The Hague, Netherlands。
22.	(2002)。Post-Chicago Developments in Antitrust Law。Post-Chicago Developments in Antitrust Law。Northampton, MA。
23.	DOJ Antitrust Division Submission for Roundtable on Portfolio Effect in Conglomerate Mergers(2001)。Range Effects: The United States Perspective。Range Effects: The United States Perspective。0。
24.	American Bar Association(1981)。Section of Antitrust Law Monograph 7: Merger Standard under U.S. Antitrust Laws。Section of Antitrust Law Monograph 7: Merger Standard under U.S. Antitrust Laws。0。
25.	Bishop, Simon、Walker, Mike(2002)。The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurement。The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurement。London, UK。
26.	Thorelli, Hans B.(1955)。The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition。The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition。Baltimore, MD。
27.	Ostry, Sylvia(1997)。The Post-cold War Trading System: Who's on First?。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。
28.	Hildebrand, Doris(2002)。The Role of Economic Analysis in the EC Competition Rules。The Role of Economic Analysis in the EC Competition Rules。The Hague, Netherlands。

其他
1.	Leary, Thomas B.(2002)。Efficiencies and Antitrust: A Story of Ongoing Evolution，Washington, DC。
2.	Majoras, Deborah Platt(2001)。GE/Honeywell: The U.S. Decision，0。
3.	(2004)。EU Gives Itself New Merger Control Rules for 21st Century，0。
4.	(1995)。Competition Policy in the New Trade Order : Strengthening International Cooperation and Rules，0。
5.	Green Paper on the Review of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89, COM (01) 745 Final，0。
6.	ICN Merger Working Group。The Analytical Framework for Merger Control，0。
7.	de Araujo, José Tavares, Jr.(2001)。Legal and Economic Interfaces between Antidumping and Competition Policy，0。
8.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1978)。Recommendation of the Council concerning Action against Restrictive Business Practices Affecting International Trade Including those Involving Multinational Enterprises，0。
9.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1995)。Recommendation of the Council concerning Co-operation between Member Countries on Anticompetitive Practices affecting International Trade，0。
10.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1998)。Recommendation of the Council concerning Effective Action Against Hard Core Cartels，0。
11.	US-EU Merger Working Group。Best Practices on Cooperation in Merger Investigations，0。
12.	Kolasky, William J.，Dick, Andrew R.。The Merger Guidelines and the Integration of Efficiencies into Antitrust Review of Horizontal Mergers，0。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	歐盟和美國航空市場整合之研究
2.	自美國法院判決探討美國政府自冷戰結束後對於國防產業廠商結合之管制
3.	異同之間--論旅法作家鄭寶娟旅行書寫中的異文化現象
4.	全球市場中臺灣傳統服飾產業之品牌時尚化分析
5.	歐盟電子通訊法對具顯著市場力量企業管制措施之研究
6.	全球化與公民身份：一個國內的觀點
7.	跨國性社群電視媒體初探：以《臺灣媳婦》為例
8.	戰爭與全球化：邁向「永久和平」？或恆久的「全球內戰」？
9.	全球化與多元價值--論WTO公共道德例外條款
10.	China in the WTO: The Impact of Global Integration on Local Governance
11.	WTO香港部長級會議：全球化與反全球化的交鋒與妥協
12.	美國與國際童工問題之禁絕
13.	WTO與全球化的法律治理：以GATS觀光附件提案為例
14.	重思網路社群：網路主題樂園團體
15.	論貿易與發展：以全球化下之世界貿易組織為中心

1.	八、九○年代臺北城市「生活空間」文學書寫研究
2.	「新移民子女文化回應課程方案」建構與實踐之研究
3.	全球在地化與地方治理發展模式:浙江台州個案研究
4.	製造創意：韓國文化內容產業政策的起源與發展
5.	臺灣金融產業的競爭政策—以競爭法的觀點出發
6.	全球化浪潮下的民族國家:衝擊與回應
7.	歐盟電子通訊法對顯著市場力量企業規範之研究
8.	全球在地化教育行政決策模式建構之研究
9.	土地,國家與邊陲社會--林屺埔大坪頂的地方性詮釋
10.	臺灣原住民族政治主體建構之研究
11.	全球化對台灣國家認同的影響
12.	論中國大陸愛國主義教育──後殖民與民族主義的觀點
13.	日據時期台灣抗日運動與民族主義之研究
14.	國民黨與民進黨政府社會福利政策之研析 ------老年經濟安全政策個案研究
15.	全球化影響終身教育發展之研究－理論分析模式之初構與應用

1.	多元文化視野下的音樂通識教育
2.	個人化與生活風格社群
3.	附錄：學習型理性--與貝克談第二現代
4.	個人主義化與第二現代

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫