:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:黃芳銘 引用關係楊金寶 引用關係許福生
作者(外文):Hwang, Fang-mingYang, Kin-baoHsu, Fu-seng
出版日期:2005
卷期:50:2
頁次:頁97-119
主題關鍵詞:生活痛苦指數複核效化競爭模式驗證性因素分析Everyday misery indexCross-validationCompeting modelsConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(72) 博士論文(16) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:71
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:163
本研究主要是透過一系列嚴謹的分析程序來建立一份具有信效度的在學青少年生活痛苦指數量表。蒐集全國在學青少年共1494 份有效問卷,將其以SPSS10.0 軟體隨機區分為三組樣本,每組各498 份。第一組樣本以探測性因素分析來獲得因素成份,結果顯示此份量表有五個因素,分別命名為「學校環境因素」、「家庭影響因素」、「社會情境因素」、「未來發展因素」,以及「政府作為因素」。接著將其建構成在學青少年生活痛苦指數的一系列競爭模式,以第二組樣本來做驗證性因素分析的評鑑,結果顯示五因素斜交模式是最為簡效的模式,對此一模式做內在結構適配評鑑也顯示觀察變項與潛在變項皆具有良好的信度、聚合效度,以及區別效度。第三組樣本則是作為複核效化的評鑑,結果顯示五因素斜交模式具有穩定性以及預測力。
The purpose of this study was to develop, using a series of analytic procedures, a reliable and valid scale for measuring adolescents’ perception of “everyday misery” at school. 1494 valid questionnaires were collected from the Taiwan area. The samples were divided into three sets by an SPSS10.0 random procedure. The first sample set was used to generate the factors through exploratory factor analysis: this resulted in a scale of five factors: the “school environment factor,” “family influence factor,” “social situation factor,” “future development factor,” and “government-generated factor.” Then a series of competing models was established and evaluated by the second sample set using confirmatory factor analysis procedure. The five-factor oblique model was found to be the most efficient one. The internal-component evaluation found that latent variables have good reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The cross-validation was tested by the third sample set for the model. The model’s stability and predictive power were confirmed.
期刊論文
1.Laub, J. H.、Sampson, Robert J.(1988)。Unraveling Families and Delinquency: A Re-analysis of the Gluecks' Data。Criminology,26,355-380。  new window
2.Baumrind, D.(1966)。Effects of Authoritative Parental Control on Child Behavior。Child Development,37(4),887-907。  new window
3.Stark, R.(1987)。Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime。Criminology,25,893-909。  new window
4.Agnew, R.(1992)。Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency。Criminology,30(1),47-87。  new window
5.劉旭山、邱致清、劉明勳、涂敏農、蘇士媛、黃思澤、李尚龍、李家華(19991200)。南區大專青少年快樂指數。訓育研究,38(4),43-55。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃德祥(19910600)。犯罪青少年剌激尋求與社會技巧之分析研究。輔導學報,14,51-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林燦璋、黃家琦(19990900)。臺灣犯罪測量、犯罪黑數、治安安全感與社會治安指標之關係。中央警察大學學報,35,237-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.侯崇文(20001200)。青少年偏差行為--社會控制理論與社會學習理論的整合。犯罪學期刊,6,35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.侯崇文(20031000)。青少年犯罪問題與政策現況。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,6,131-148。  延伸查詢new window
10.許春金、楊士隆(19930700)。社區與少年偏差行為:社區解組犯罪理論之實證研究。警政學報,23,183-218。  延伸查詢new window
11.Gabrieal, M. A.(1988)。Boredom: Exploration of a Developmental Perspective。Clinical Social Work Journal,163,156-164。  new window
12.沈玉燕(1998)。「黑毒戲法,架構百姓痛苦指數」座談會紀實。法律與你系列,52,91-103。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊孝榮(1998)。復興公園少年犯罪社區處遇之實務。社區發展季刊,82,97-110。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉玲君(1997)。青少年生活態度與價值觀指標調查研究。學生輔導,54,146-158。  延伸查詢new window
15.葉雅馨(2003)。青少年憂鬱很嚴重嗎?。飛颺少年雙月刊,5。  延伸查詢new window
16.Robinson, Paul(1978)。Parents of "Beyond Control" Adolescents。Adolescence,13(49),109-119。  new window
會議論文
1.莊耀嘉(2000)。兒童性格與偏差行為之發展:一項貫時性研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉和然、黃芳銘(2000)。在學青少年生活痛苦指標調查之研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許春金、馬傳鎮(1999)。少年偏差行為早年預測之研究。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林青瑩(1998)。青少年偏差行為的家庭因素之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麗梅(1993)。家庭氣氛、父母管教態度與兒童偏差行為關係之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sutherland, Edwin H.(1967)。The professional thief。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.范國勇(2000)。少年偏差行為理論整合實證之研究。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Erikson, E. H.(1993)。Identity: Youth and Crisis。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
4.Shaw, C. R.、Mckay, H. D.(1972)。Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas。University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.許春金(2000)。犯罪學。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hirschi, T.(1969)。Causes of delinquency。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
7.Durkheim, Émile、Spaulding, John A.、Simpson, George(1951)。Suicide: A Study in Sociology。Free Press。  new window
8.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gottfredson, Michael R.、Hirschi, Travis(1990)。A General Theory of Crime。Stanford University Press。  new window
10.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Sampson, R.、Laub, J.(1993)。Crime in the Marketing。Crime in the Marketing。沒有紀錄。  new window
12.Cooley, Charles Horton(1902)。Human Nature and Social Order。Human Nature and Social Order。New York, NY。  new window
13.Cummongs, Rhoda(1995)。Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective。Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective。Florida, USA。  new window
14.Freud, S.(1961)。Some Psychical Consequences of the Anatomical Distinction between the Sexes。The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19: The Ego and the Id, and Other Works。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.向陽公益基金會(2001)。2001年青少年生活痛苦指數調查,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃芳銘(1996)。The Influence of Social Class on Students' School Performance: A Construction of a Conceptual Model and its Empirical Test,0。  new window
3.陳嘉彰(2001)。下一代的問題,政府注意到了嗎?,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Agnew, Robert(1995)。The Contribution of Social-psychological Strain Theory to the Explanation of Crime and Delinquency。Advances in Criminological Theory, Volume 6: The Legacy of Anomie Theory。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers。  new window
2.Steinberg, L.(1990)。Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship。At the Threshold: the Developing Adolescent。Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE