關係行為影響模式的建構與實徵研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	關係行為影響模式的建構與實徵研究
作者：	郭維哲
作者(外文)：	Wei-zhe Guo
校院名稱：	國立臺南大學
系所名稱：	教育經營與管理研究所博士班
指導教授：	丁學勤
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2012
主題關鍵詞：	面子維護；關係行為；社會科學邏輯；感情投資；人情回報；the logic of science in sociology；affect investments(ganqing tou zi)；reciprocal favor (renqing hui bou )；saving face(mianzi wei hu)；Guanxi behavior
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:329

關係（Guanxi）是華人社會中普遍的現象，也是社會主要的動力來源，在社會生活、經商管理與學術研究上，確實有其必要性與重要性。由於過去的關係研究，仍有諸多缺口尚待填補，例如，關係研究概念定義不清語意不明、關係研究主題偏重既定的與靜態的、關係研究結果相似又不具體、關係研究領域侷限在單一領域、關係理論模式分類不清時間錯置、以及關係相關研究忽略關鍵影響機制等問題。
基於上述，本研究主要的目的，在探討華人社會中關係行為影響模式建構的相關議題，包含關係概念的重新概念化、關係行為模式的理論建構、信任影響機制的討論與實徵研究等四部分。首先，本研究以Kuhn（1970）構念演化與Thagard（1992）構念轉變的觀點，將關係重新概念化為一種關係行為的表現；其次，藉由Wallance（1971）社會科學邏輯中理論建構的觀點，建構出以個人、家庭與環境等變項為前因，以生活、人際與工作等變項為後果的關係行為影響模式；另外，則以信任為變項，探討其對關係行為與相關變項間的中介與干擾效果；最後，再以Wallance（1971）社會科學邏輯中實徵研究的角度，藉由結構方程模式(structural equation model, SEM)方法，針對403份有效回卷之國中小學生家長進行一系列的驗證與分析。
研究結果顯示，第一，關係概念可以重新概念化為一種包含感情投資、人情回報與面子維護等要素的行為表現，實徵研究上透過競爭模式的分析，顯示關係行為以一種二階層因素結構模式，比較能符合因素結構的適當性與精簡性。第二，關係行為影響模式的建構，具有結構社會學與理性選擇理論、關係中心行為與關係理性行為、「倫」與「理」等雙元性的特質，實徵研究上，外向性人格、家庭情緒支持與和諧價值觀等三個前因變項，對關係行為皆有不錯的影響力，而關係行為對生活滿意度、程序公平性與組織公民行為等三個後果變項，也有不錯的影響效果。第三，信任是關係行為維持與運作的關鍵機制，實徵研究上顯示信任對關係行為與程序公平之關係，具有部分的中介效果，而對關係行為與組織公民行為之關係，則有干擾現象。最後根據研究結果提出管理上的意涵，並提出未來進一步研究的建議。

以文找文

“Guanxi” is not only a common phenomenon in the Chinese society, but also a kind of driving forces in our society. It is indeed important and necessary in different areas, such as social life, business managements and academic researches. There were still many gaps to be filled in the past studies of relationship. For example, the definition or the concept of relationship was unclear, the topics were fixed, the results were similar and not concrete, the research was limited to a single field, the classification of relationship theorical models was indefinite, and the key influential mechanism was ignored, etc.
Based on the above, the main purpose of this study was to explore the related issues of the construction of Guanxi behavior effect model in the Chinese society, including the reconceptualization of the concept of Guanxi, the theory construction of Guanxi behavior model, the discussion on trust effect mechanism and empirical researches.First, according to the ideas of Kuhn’s “conceptual evolution” and Thagard’s “conceptual revolution”, this study reconceptualized “guanxi” as a performance of Guanxi behaviors. Second, from Wallance’s view of theory construction of the logic of science in sociology, the study constructed the behavior effect model of antecedents (personal, family and environmental variables) and consequences (life, interpersonal and work variables). Third, the study took “trust” as the variable to explore the mediating effects and the moderating effects between guanxi behavior and other related variables. Finally, with Wallance’s ideas in his empirical researches on the logic of science in sociology, the study verified and analyzed 403 valid questionnaires by structural equation model (SEM) method.
This study reached the following conclusions: First, Guanxi could be reconceptualized as a performance of Guanxi behaviors including affect investments (ganqing tou zi), reciprocal favor (renqing hui bou ) and saving face(mianzi wei hu). By analyzing the competition models, the study found that guanxi behavior could fit adequate and parsimonious characteristics more in second order factor structure model. Second, the constuction of guanxi behavior effect model included these theories: structural sociology, rational choice theory, relationship-oriented behavior, rationality-oriented behavior, “lun” and “li”. On empirical researches, the three antecedent variables: extraversion personalities, family emotional supports and harmony values, made a great impact on guanxi behavior. On the other hand, guanxi behavior also made impact on the three consequences variables: life satisfaction, procedural justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Third, “trust” was the key mechanism to the maintenance and operation of guanxi behavior. It had not only partially mediating effect upon the relationship between guanxi behavior and procedural justice, but also moderating effect upon the relationship between guanxi behavior and the organizational citizenship behavior.
In conclusion, based on the findings, this study gave “Guanxi” a meaningful comment on management and provided suggestions for future studies.

以文找文

一、中文部分
朱瑞玲（1987）。中國人的社會互動：試論面子的運作。中國社會學刊，11，23-53。 new window

何友暉（1999）。人際情感與人情。本土心理學研究，12，181-187。 new window

何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕（1991）。關係取向：為中國社會心理方法論求答案。載於楊國樞、黃光國主編，中國人的心理與行為（頁49-66）。台北：桂冠圖書公司，。 new window

佐斌（2002）。中國人的關係取向：概念及其測量。華中師範大學學報(人文社會科學版），1，74-80。
吳萬益（2005）。企業研究方法。台北：華泰圖書公司。
汪睿祥（2005）。壽險行銷中的社會鑲嵌。關係管理研究，2，77-102。
周麗芳（2002）。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究，18，175-228。 new window

林瑞（1999）。對人際關係與人際情感構念化的評論：社會學者的看法。本土心理學研究，12，189-202。
林鉦棽（1996）。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究：社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報，13（3），391-415。
林行宜、戚樹誠（1994）。企業高階主管親信關係之研究。管理科學學報，11（2），281-312。
邱展謙、洪晨桓、祝道松、池文海（2007）。知覺關係（Guanxi）量表之發展。管理評論，26（1），47-70。 new window

金耀基（1980）。人際關係中的人情之分析（初探）。載於中央研究院主編，第一屆漢學會議論文集（頁413-428）。台北：中央研究院。
金耀基（1992）。關係和網絡的建構：一個社會學的詮釋。二十一世紀雙月刊，12，143-157 new window

洪晨桓（2007）。華人關係量表之發展---內部顧客觀點。國立東華大學企業管理學系研究所博士論文，未出版。 new window

馬克思（1990）。資本論。北京：人民出版社。
張志成、許聰盡、李保建（2006）。以決策權衡與意圖檢視運動行為改變模式及生活滿意度之關係。大專體育學刊，8，51-62。 new window

張志學（2001）。中國人的人際關係認知：一項多維度的研究。楊中芳（主編），中國人的人際關係、情感與信任（頁159-180）。遠流出版公司，台北。 new window

張苙雲（2003）。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：W1, W2國中學生、家長、學生表現評量合併檔，第二波（2003年）家長問卷。取自中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫http://srda.sinica.edu.tw
陳之昭（1988）。面子心理的理論分析與實際研究。載於楊國樞主編，中國人的心理（頁155-237）。台北市：桂冠。
陳介玄、高承恕（1991）。台灣企業運作的社會秩序：人情關係與法律。東海學報，32，219-232。
陳欽春（2008）。社會信任指標及其調查機制之建構。行政院研究發展考核委員會九十六年度委託研究案，1-250。
章英華（1995）。殊性與共性、關係與集體：讀〈差序格局與華人組織行為〉的隨想。本土心理學研究，3，221-228。 new window

喬健（1982）。關係芻議。見楊國樞、文崇一主編，社會及行為科學研究的中文化（頁345-360）。台北：中央研究院民族研究所。 new window

彭泗清（2000）。關係與信任：中國人人際信任的一項本土研究。中國社會學年鑑（1995-1998），290-297。
彭懷真（1989）。台灣企業業主的「關係」及其轉變。東海大學社會學研究所博士論文。
黃光國（1985）。人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。載於李亦園、楊國樞、文崇一主編，現代化與中國化論文集（頁125-153）。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 new window

黃光國（1988）。中國人的權力遊戲。台北︰巨流。 new window

黃光國（2001）。儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎。教育與社會研究，2，1-34。 new window

黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。台北：五南。
黃芳銘、楊金寶、許福生（2005）。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報：教育類，50（2），97-119。 new window

黃家齊（2002）。組織公正與組織公民行為-認知型與情感型信任的中介效果。台大管理論叢，12（2），107-141。 new window

黃懿慧（2001）。公共關係之「關係」研究-研究方向的省思與展望。廣告學研究，17，21-44。 new window

黃懿慧（2002）。關係取向理論模式初探︰組織與利益關係人關係之探討。本土心理學研究，18，95-172。 new window

黃曬莉（1999）。人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究。台北：桂冠。 new window

楊中芳（1999）。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。本土心理學研究，12，105-179。 new window

楊中芳（2001）。人際信任的構念化：一個人際關係的觀點。載於楊中芳主編，中國人的人際關係、情感與信任-一個人際交往的觀點（頁371-399）。台北：遠流。 new window

楊宜音（2000）。自己人：一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。本土心理學研究，13，277-316。 new window

楊宜音（1995）：試析人際關係及其分類——兼與黃光國先生商榷。社會學研究（北京），5 ，18-23。
楊國樞（1993）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。載於楊國樞、余安邦主編，中國人的心理與行為-理念及方法篇（頁87-142）。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 new window

鄒川雄（1997）。和諧思維與張力思維：老子與聖經思維方式之比較。本土心理學研究，7，30-68.
翟學偉（1993）。中國人際關係的特質-本土的概念及其模式。社會學研究，4，239-257。
臺灣中華書局辭海編輯委員會編製（1985）。辭海。臺北：中華。
劉萃俠（2001）。一九八八年以來大陸人際關係與交往研究概述。載於楊中芳主編：中國人的人際關係情感與信任（頁27-86）。台北：遠流。
潘偉華、翁正忞（2008）。華人關係的影響因素：大陸台商的實證研究。商管季刊，9（4），597-628。 new window

鄭也夫（2001）。信任論。北京：中國廣播電視出版社。
鄭伯壎（1995a）。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。
鄭伯壎（1995b）。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。 new window

鄭伯壎（1999）。華人人際關係研究的困境與出路。本土心理學研究，12，203-214。 new window

鄭伯壎（2003）。台灣的組織行為研究：過去、現在、及未來。載於鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳主編，組織行為研究在台灣：三十年回顧與展望（頁1-59）。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
鄭伯壎（2005）。華人組織行為研究的方向與策略：由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究，24，191-245。 new window

鄭坤裕（2001）。工作異動之組織正義知覺對異動後工作態度之影響。交通大學經營管理研究所，碩士論文。
羅宗敏、王俊人、許雄傑（2007）。創業者人格特質對創業績效影響之研究。創業管理研究年，2（4），57-88。
羅家德（2005）。關係管理芻議-關係管理研究的回顧與展望。關係管理研究，1，1-41。
羅家德（2006）。華人的人脈-個人中心信任網路。關係管理研究，3，1-24。
羅新興（2000）。績效評核的程序正義之研究─探討受評者正義知覺之前因及影響。台灣大學商學研究所，博士論文。 new window

二、英文部分
Abramson, N. R., & Ai, J. X. (1997). Using guanxi-style buyer-seller relationships in China: Reducing uncertainty and improving performance outcomes. International Executive, 39(6), 765-804.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage..
Alston, J. P. (1989). Wa, guanxi, and inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea. Business Horizons, 32(2), 26-31.
Ambler, T. (1995). Reflections in China: Re-orienting images of marketing. Marketing Management, 4(1), 22-30.
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Barringer, B. R., & Greening, D. W. (1998). Small business growth through geographic expansion: a comparative case study. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 467-492.
Baruch, y., O’ Creevy, M. F., Hind, P., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2004). Prosocial behavior and job performance on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 399-411.
Baruch, y., O’ Creevy, M. F., Hind, P., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2004). Prosocial behavior and job performance on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 399-411.
Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B, Liden, R. C., & Wayne. S. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 91(2), 298-310.
Bedford, O. (2011). Guanxi-building in the workplace: A dynamic process model of working and backdoor Guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 149-158.
Bell, D. (2000). Guanxi: A nesting of groups. Current Anthropology, 41(1), 132-138.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
Bond, M.H., & Hwang, K.K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In: Bond, M.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of the Chinese People(pp. 213-266). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol III: Loss, Sadness and Depression. London: The Hogarth Press.
Brass, D.J.(1981). Structural relationship, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331-348.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
Brunner, J. A., Chen, J., Sun, C., & Zhou, N. (1989). The role of guanxi in negotiations in the Pacific Basin. Journal of Global Marketing, 3(2), 7-23.
Brunner, J. and G. Taoka. (1977). Marketing and negotiating in the People’s Republic of China: Perceptions of American businessmen who attended the 1975 Canton Trade Fair. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 69-82.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cadee, D. D., & Zhang, B. Y. (2000). The impact of guanxi on export performance: A study of New Zealand firms exporting to China. Journal of Global Marketing, 14(1), 129-149.
Chang, H., & Holt, G.R. (1991). More than relationship: Chinese interaction and the principle of kuan-hsi. Communication Quarterly, 39 (3), 251-271.
Chen C.C., Chen, Y.-R. , & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi Practices and Trust in Management: A Procedural Justice Perspective. Organization Science, 15 (2), 200-209.
Chen, C. C. & X. P. Chen. ( 2009). ‘Negative Externalities of Close Guanxi Within Organizations. Work and Occupations, 24(February), 56-79.
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y., & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2), 200-209.
Chen, M.-H. (2009). Guanxi Networks and Creativity in Taiwanese Project Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 269-277.
Chen, X., & Chen, C. (2004). On the Intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: A Process Model of Guanxi Development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 305-324.
Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Participative leadership by American and Chinese managers in China: The role of relationships. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1727-1752.
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E. & Sun, F. (2011). Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 715-735.
Chen, Y., Friedman. R., Yu, E., Fang, W. & Lu, X. (2009). Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi: Developing a Three-Dimensional Model and Scale. Management and Organization Review, 14(3): 375-399.
Cheng, B. S., Farh, J. L., & Chang, H. F. (2002). Guanxi, zhongcheng, competence and managerial behavior in the Chinese context. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 151-166.
Cheung, C. & A. C. Chan (2005). Philosophical Foundations of Eminent Hong Kong CEOs’ Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 47-62.
Chinese Culture Connection, 1987. Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18 (2), 143-164.
Chou, L. F., Chen, B.S., Huang, M. P., & Cheng, H. Y. (2006). Guanxi networks and members’ effectiveness in Chinese work teams: Mediating effects of trust networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 79-95.
Chow, I. H. S. (2009).The relationship between social capital, organizational citizenship behavior, and performance outcomes: an empirical study from China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 74(3), 44-54.
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underling structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
Collier, D. (1995). Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: The case of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 461-466.
Cook, K. S. (2004). Networks, Norms and Trust: The Social Psychology of Social Capital. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 4-14.
Davies, H., Leung, T. K. P., Luk, S. T. K., & Wong, Y. H. (1995). The benefit of Guanxi. Industrial Marketing Management, 24(3), 207-214.
Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67,315-326.
Diener, E., Emmoms, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191-204.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Journal of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
Fan, Y. (2002). Questioning Guanxi: Definition, Classification and Implications. International Business Review, 11(5), 543-561,
Fan, Y. H., Woodbine, G. & Scully, G. (2012). Guanxi and its influence on the judgments of Chinese auditors. Asia Pacific Business Review18(1), 83-97.
Fang Y.(2011). The Importance of Guanxi to Multinational Companies in China. Asian Social Science, 7(7), 163-168.
Far, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C. & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3), 421-444.
Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. (1998). The influence of relational demography and Guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice of reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Friedman, R., Chi, S. C., & Liu, L. A. (2006). An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 76-91.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Gao, H., Ballantyne, D. & Knight, J. (2010). Paradoxes and guanxi dilemmas in emerging Chinese-Western intercultural relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 264-272.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B. & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-Presentation in als The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and perceived Success in Internet Dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177.
Gilbert, D. C., & Chol, K. C. (2003). Relationship marketing practice in relation to different bank ownerships: A study of banks in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(3), 137-146.
Graen, G.., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
Gundelach, P. & Kreiner, S. (2004). Happiness and Life Satisfaction in Advanced European Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 359-386.
Hackley, C. A., & Dong, Q. (2001). American public relations networking encounters China’s guanxi. Public Relations Quarterly, 46(2), 16-19.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Ho, C. & Redfern, K.A. ( 2010). Consideration of the role of guanxi in the ethical judgments of chinese managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 207-221.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
Hofstede, G. H. (1983). The Culture Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 75-89.
Hogg, J., & Rothbart M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for ingroup and outgroup behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
Hom, P. W., & Xiao, Z. (2006). Structural holes in guanxi network: Do they increase employee turnover in the People’s Republic of China? Academy of Management Proceedings, August, 1-6.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen:Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44.
Hu, H. C. (1949). Emotions, real and assumed, in Chinese society. New York: Columbia University.
Hu, H. H., Hsu, W. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2004). Reward allocation decisions of Chinese managers: Influence of employee categorization and allocation context. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(2), 221-232.
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). CA: Sagex.
Hui, C., & Graen, G. (1997). Guanxi and professional leadership in contemporary Sino-American joint ventures in mainland China. Leadership Quarterly, 8(4), 451-465.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
Hwang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30 (2), 155-178.
Jacobs, B. J. (1982). The concept of guanxi and social politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. In Greenblatt, S. L., Wilson, R. W. & Wilson, A. A.(Eds.). Social interaction in Chinese society(pp. 209-236). New York:Praeger.
Jacobs, J. B. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch’ing and kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 77, 237-273.
Ji, J., Xu, X. & Rich, s. L. (2002). Determinants of family life satisfaction in reforming urban China. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(2), 169-191.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1992). Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide (2nd ed.). IN: Scientific Software.
Kahn, R.L., & Antouncci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life courses, attachment, roles and social. In P.B. Baltes & O.G. Brim (eds.), Life-Span Development and Behavior(pp. 253-286). New York: Academic Press.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
King, A. Y. (1991). Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120(2), 63-84.
Kipnis, A. B. (1996). The language of gifts: Managing guanxi in a north China village. Modern China, 22(3), 285-314.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal , 37, 656-669.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, D. J., Pae, J. H., & Wong, Y. H. (2001). A model of close business relationship in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(2), 51-69.
Lee, D. Y., & Dawes, P. L. (2005). Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 28-56.
Lee, D., Pae, J., & Wong, Y. (2001). A model of close business relationships in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 51-69.
Leung, K. & Bond, M.H. (1989). On the Empirical Identification of Dimensions for Cross-Cultural Comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133-151.
Leung, T. K. P., Wong, Y. H., & Wong, S. (1996). A study of Hong Kong businessmen’s perceptions of the role Guanxi in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 749-758.
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J. Jr., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation references. In G. Mikula(Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction(pp. 167-217 ). Springer-Verlag, New York,.
Lewicki, R. J., Mcallister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
Li, J., & Tsui, A. S. (2000). A citation analysis of management and organization research in the Chinese context: 1984-1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 87-107.
Lin, L. H. (2011). Cultural and Organizational Antecedents of Guanxi: The Chinese Cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 441-451.
Lin, L. H., & Ho, Y. L. (2010). Guanxi and OCB: the Chinese cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 285-298.
Lin, N. (1986).Conceptualizing Social support. In N. Lin , A. Dean & W. M. Ensel(Eds.), Social Support , Life Events ,and Depression(pp.17-48) .FL:Academic Press.
Liu, L. A., Friedman, R. A. & Chi, S-c. (2005). Ren Qing versus the Big Five: The Role of Culturally Sensitive Measures of Individual Difference in Distributive Negotiations. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 225-247.
Lo, K. D. (2007). An empirical investigation of emic differences between American networking and Chinese guanxi and a process model of building relationships for cross-cultural business interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of International Management, University of Hawaii.
Luo , Y. (2007). Guanxi and Business(2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Luo, Y. (1997a). Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human System Management, 16(1), 43-51.
Luo, Y. (1997b). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. Management International Review, 37(1), 51-70.
Luo, Y. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1315-1327.
Marsh, H. W. & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McCrae, R. & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1992). An introduction to the fiv-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 172-215.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five factor theory perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, M. S. & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Are sociable people more beautiful? A zero-acquaintance analysis of agreeableness, extraversion, and attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(2), 293-296.
Michailova, S., & Worm, V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4), 509-527.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1994). Social network analysis: Recent achievements and current controversies. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 329-343.
Moons, P., Budt, W., & de Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualization of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 891-901.
Mueller, G. P. (2006). Conflict Buffers and Marital Satisfaction: On the Effects of Different Forms of Social Support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 499-515.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 369(3), 527-556.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 622-647.
Nolan, J. (2011). Good guanxi and bad guanxi : Western bankers and the role of network practices in institutional change in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(16), 3357-3372.
Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hall
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solidier syndrome. MA: Lexington Books.
Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455-477.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods(2nd ed.). CA: Sage.
Peng, S.Q. (1998). Guanxi in trust: An indigenous study of Chinese interpersonal trust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong.
Pistole, M. C.(1989). Attachment in adult romantic relationships: Style of conflict resolution and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 6, 505-510.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Pye, L. W. (1982). Chinese commercial negotiating style. MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
Redding, G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
Schwartz, S.H.(1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical adnances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psuchology, 25, 1-65.
Shou, Z., Guo, R., Zhang, Q., & Su, C.(2011). The many faces of trust and guanxi behavior: Evidence from marketing channels in China. Industrial Marketing Management. ISSN 0019-8501, DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.12.006.
Smith, A. H. (1894). Chinese Characteristics. New York: Revell.
Smith, P. B., Torres, C., Leong, C. H., Budhwar, P., Achoui, M. & Lebedeva, N. (2012). Are indigenous approaches to achieving influence in business organizations distinctive? A comparative study of guanxi, wasta, jeitinho, svyazi and pulling strings. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 333-348.
Sparrowe, R,T., Linden, R. C. & Kraimer, M. L.(2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
Standifird, S. S. (2006). Using Guanxi to Establish Corporate Reputation in China. Corporate Reputation Review 9, 171-178.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Four lessons learned form the person-situation debate: A review and research agenda. In D. B. Smith. & B. Schneider (Eds.), Personality and organizations(pp. 61-85). NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
Su, C. T., & Littlefield, J. E. (2001). Entering guanxi: A business ethical dilemma in mainland China? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3), 119-210.
Su, C., Mitchell, R., & Sirgy, M. (2007). Enabling Guanxi Management in China: A Hierarchical Stakeholder Model of Effective Guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 301-319.
Su, C., Yang, Z., Zhuang, G., Zhou, N., & Dou, W. (2009). Interpersonal influence as an alternative channel communication behavior in emerging markets: The case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(4), 668-689.
Sue-Chan, C., & Dasborough, M. T. (2006). The influence of relation-based and rule-based regulations on hiring decisions in the Australian and Hong Kong Chinese cultural contexts. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1267-1292.
Taormina, R. J. & Gao, J. H. (2010). A research model for Guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39, 1195-1212.
Teri, Q.,& Connie, S.(2002). Academic Self-Disclosure in Adolescence. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128(1), 47-75.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tsang, E.W.K.(1998). Can Guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive , 12 (2), 64-73.
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and Guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1), 56-79.
Tsui, A. S., Schoonhoven, C. B., Meyer, M. W., Lau, C. M., & Milkovich, G. T. (2004). Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People’s Republic of China. Organization science, 15(2), 133-144.
Tyler, T. R., & S. Blader. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. New York: Psychological Press.
Tyler, T. R., E. A. Lind. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(pp.115-191). CA: Academic Press.
Van De Ven, A. H., Hudson R., & Schroeder D. M., 1984, Designing new business start-ups: entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management, 10, 87-107.
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing Collaborative Relations: Building Trust in Inter-Organizational Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1): 5-31.
Vanhonacker, W. R. (2004). Guanxi networks in China. China Business Review, 31(3), 48-53.
Wallance, W. (1971). The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
Wang, C. L. (2007). Guanxi vs. relationship marketing: Exploring underlying differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 81-86.
Wang, J., Wang, G. G., Ruona, W. E. A., & Rojewski, J. W. (2005). Confucian values and the implications for international HRD. Human Resource Development International, 8(3), 311-326.
Wank, D. L. (1996). The institutional process of market clientelism: Guanxi and private business in a south China city. The China Quarterly, 29(3), 820-838.
Warren, D. E., Dunfee, T. W., & Li, N. (2004). Social exchange in China: The double-edged sword of guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 355-372.
Weber, M. (1915).The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism.New York:The Free Press
Westwood, R. R. (1992). Culture, cultural differences, and organizational behavior. In R. I. Westwood (ed.), Organizational Behavior: A Southeast Asia Perspectives (pp. 27-61). Hong Kong: Longman.
Whetton, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
Wong, C. S., Wong, Y. T., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (2001). The significant role of Chinese employees’ organizational commitment: Implications for managing employees in Chinese Societies. Journal of World Business, 36(3), 1-15.
Wong, M. (2010), Guanxi Management in Lean Production System—An Empirical Study of Taiwan-Japanese Firms. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(3), 1079-1106.
Wong, Y. T., Ngo, H. Y., & Wong, C. S. (2003). Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(4), 481-499.
Wong, Y., Leung, T., Hung, H., & Ngai, E. (2007). A Model of Guanxi Development: Flexibility, Commitment and Capital Exchange. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(8), 875-887.
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1641-1658.
Yamagishi, T. (2001). Trust as a Form of Social Intelligence. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in Society (pp. 121-147). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Yan, Y. (1996). The culture of guanxi in a north China village. The China Journal, 35, 1-26.
Yang, H., van de Vliert, E., & Shi, K. (2005). Siding in a workplace dispute in China: The impact of legitimacy, sanction, and guanxi. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(3), 329-347.
Yang, K.S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: an integrative analysis. In: Lin, T.Y., Tseng, W.S., Yeh, E.K. (Eds.), Chinese Societies and Mental Health(pp. 19-39). Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
Yang, M. M. (1994). Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. NY: Cornell University Press.
Yen, D. A., Barnes, B. R. & Wang, C. L. (2011).The measurement of guanxi: Introducing the GRX scale. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 97-108.
Yeung, I. Y. M., & Tung, R. L. (1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 54-65.
Yeung, I.Y.M., Tung, R.L., 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the importance of Guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics 25 (2), 54-65.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290.
Young, M. H., Miller, B. C., Norton, M. C., & Hill, E. J. (1995). The Effect of Parental Supportive Behaviors on Life Satisfaction of Adolescent Offspring. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 813-822.
Zhang, X., Li, G., 2003. Does Guanxi matter to nonfarm employment? Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (2), 315-331.
Zhuang, G.., Xi, Y. & Tsang, A. (2010). Power, conflict, and cooperation: the impact of guanxi in chinese marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 137-149.
Zucker,L. G. (1986). Production of Trust: InstitutionalSources of Economic Structure,1840-1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp.53-111). CT: JAI Press.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	師不能嚴，道亦難尊？當代華人「尊師」之雙重內涵、功能及轉化
2.	於梨華《又見棕櫚，又見棕櫚》的文化震盪現象
3.	穿梭虛實之間：上班族玩家在線上遊戲的社會資本運作之探討
4.	傳承社會資本延續家族企業價值
5.	周而不比抑或比而不周？團隊差序式領導、團隊交融記憶系統與團隊績效：團隊內自己人角色的調節效果
6.	析探初任高考公務人員的工作責任、工作生活平衡及人際關係滿意度之影響
7.	後新冠肺炎(COVID-19)時代，郵輪產業美容美體SPA館主管不同之轉換型領導，對人格特質與組織承諾對其調節效果研究
8.	若即若離？探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
9.	建構新聞工作者傳播工具與人脈互動的架構：從社會資本交換與再媒介化之考察
10.	求職者觀點下的臺灣家族企業組織形態
11.	差序式領導與團體效能：三元模式的驗證
12.	回首來時路，步步向前行：華人家族企業的探索與反思
13.	幼兒園教師美的和諧觀及其在人際互動的實踐
14.	中等學校射箭學生運動員目標取向與教練-選手關係之影響
15.	探析儒家思想對大專公開組游泳運動教練領導行為的影響

1.	網路、電視與紙媒之置入性行銷效果差異比較實證研究
2.	華人社會的潛規則：表裡不一與陽奉陰違
3.	公務人員組織認定與關係認定契合之影響：路徑、後果及調節效果
4.	差序式領導與自己人部屬的角色：多層次分析觀點
5.	華人文化脈絡的幼兒園長課程領導之探究
6.	華人生命觀與孝順行為之相關研究：重構儒家文化之親子關係
7.	臉書社會比較之幸福感研究--自戀傾向為調節變項
8.	家庭效能信念之運作歷程及其影響
9.	認定領導：理論建構、量表發展及效果驗證
10.	以治理機制與權力關係觀點論主管機關與民間體育組織之治理關係
11.	荷馬史詩與詩經人格教育思想之比較
12.	跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
13.	大學生網路霸凌倫理判斷歷程之探究
14.	威權領導對任務績效之影響:以LMX及部屬職場偏差行為為中介因子
15.	上海地區家事調解社會工作專業知能建構之行動研究

1.	制度變遷、社會資本、政治參與：三者之間的關係
2.	袁枚贈答詩研究
3.	家庭與家人關係
4.	中國近代平等觀念的形成(1895~1915)
5.	管理與商業心理學
6.	臺灣公共關係職能建構之研究
7.	雙鄉之間：臺灣外省小說家的離散與敘事(一九五○~一九八七)
8.	社會問題
9.	勞資關係：權力、資本與階級
10.	社工管理學
11.	家長式領導對運動團隊文化的影響：團隊內互動的中介效果及運動動機的調節效果
12.	班級經營：學說與案例應用
13.	團隊領導對團隊效能的影響：以教練效能及領導信任為中介效果
14.	致命的感染力：中國現代民族主義對臺灣的衝擊
15.	文教、信仰與文化建構：臺灣六堆敬字風俗硏究

無相關著作

1.	人際關係與人際情感的構念化
2.	人際交往中的人情與關係
3.	影響教育版軟體再購意圖之因素：整合期望確認理論與套牢效應觀點
4.	澳門中小學教師組織公平感知研究
5.	94學年度UBA主場運動觀眾消費頻率、觀賞動機與滿意度之關係研究
6.	模糊績效評估模式--以住院醫師為例
7.	分配公平性與程序公平性對滿意度與承諾的相對影響力之缺口評論
8.	工作動機研究之回顧與前瞻
9.	公平性認知對組織成員工作滿意度與組織承諾影響之實證研究
10.	國中七年級普通班身心障礙學生學校適應之研究—以SNELS為例
11.	教師角色對國中生偏差行為影響的貫時性分析
12.	國小弱勢學生國語文學習成就影響因素之分析與模型建構
13.	「遷移世代」文化認同之研究:以海峽兩岸台商子女為例
14.	家庭作業與學習成就關係之研究—以TIMSS與TEPS臺灣學生為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫