:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論科學評價與其在科技政策中的涵意
書刊名:臺灣科技法律與政策論叢
作者:陳瑞麟 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ruey Lin
出版日期:2005
卷期:2:4
頁次:頁37-71
主題關鍵詞:科學評價科技政策科學哲學認知價值理論選擇Scientific evaluationScience policyPhilosophy of scienceCognitive valueTheory choice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:49
  • 點閱點閱:83
期刊論文
1.陳瑞麟(20050300)。科學的戰爭與和平--「科學如何運作」的建構論與實在論之爭。歐美研究,35(1),141-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Longino, H.(1995)。Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues。Syntheses,104,383-397。  new window
學位論文
1.戴東源(2005)。理論選擇:一個理性論的解釋與辯護(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Branscomb, Lewis M.、Keller, James H.(1999)。Investing in Innovation: Creating a research and innovation po licy that works。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press。  new window
2.Branscomb, Lewis M.、Auerswald, Philip E.(2001)。Taking Technical Risks: How innovators, executives, and investors manage high-tech risks。Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press。  new window
3.Kuhn, T.(1977)。Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice, in Kuhn, The Essential Tension。Chicago:The University of Chicago。  new window
4.Lakatos, I.(1978)。The Methodology of Scientific Research Programme--Philosophical papers。Cambridge:Cambridge University。  new window
5.Laudan, L.(1984)。Science and Values--The aim of science and their role in scientific debate。Berkeley:University of California。  new window
6.Branscomb, Lewis M.、Choi, Young-Hwan(1996)。Korea at the Turning Point: Innovation-based strategies for development。London:Praeger Press。  new window
7.Lacey, H.(1999)。Is Science Value Free? Values and scientific understanding。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Laudan, Larry(1996)。Beyond Positivism and Relativism--Theory, method, and evidence。Westview Press。  new window
9.Longino, H.(2002)。The Fate of Knowledge。Princeton:Princeton Univensity Press。  new window
10.Popper, K.(2004)。The Logic of Scientific Discovery。New York:Routledge。  new window
11.Popper, K.(1969)。Conjectures and Refutations。London:Routledge。  new window
12.Longino, Helen E.(1990)。Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry。Princeton University Press。  new window
13.陳瑞麟(20040000)。科學理論版本的結構與發展。臺北:國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.女性學學會,文化研究學會(2006)。反思台灣的(人文及社會)高教評鑑學術研討會,http://www.hss.nthu.edu.tw/〜apcs/pages/act/kao.htm, 2006/03/02。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Branscomb, Lewis M.(1993)。The National Technology Policy Debate。Empowering Technology: Implementing a U. S. strategy。Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press。  new window
2.Hempel, C. G.(2001)。Valuation and Objectivity in Science。The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel--Studies in science, explanation, and rationality。Oxford:Oxford University。  new window
3.Lakatos, I.(1978)。The problem of appraising scientific theories: three approaches。Mathematics, Science and Epistemology--Philosophical papers。Cambridge:Cambridge University。  new window
4.Longino, H.(1996)。Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science--Rethinking the dichotomy。Feminism, Science, the Philosophy of Science。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE