:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:倡廉反貪與民主治理
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:余致力 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Chilik
出版日期:2006
卷期:3:3
頁次:頁165-175
主題關鍵詞:倡廉反貪民主治理委託人與代理人理論全球貪腐趨勢指數政府廉政主觀指標Promoting integrity and anti-corruptionDemocratic governancePrincipal-agent theoryGlobal corruption barometerGovernment integrity subjective index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(5) 專書(4) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:66
為何民主化後的臺灣,政府的廉潔程度不進反退?本文首先以委託人與代理人理論來回顧與檢視民主治理的基本型態,再從國際透明組織所公布的「全球貪腐趨勢指數」與我國法務部所公布的「政府廉政主觀指標」民意調查資料中,找出民眾心目中,要為貪腐負責的主要人員。最後,本文強調,臺灣在倡廉反貪的作為上,特別是針對民選公職與政務領導的部分,尚有相當多的努力空間與必要。人民不能完全依賴其代理人來解決貪腐問題,必須在民主治理過程中扮演更主動積極的角色。
After democratic transformation, the integrity of the Taiwanese government failed to live up to expectations. Why did this happen? This article first applies the principle-agent theory to review the basic model of democratic governance, and then uses the survey data from the Global Corruption Barometer (published by Transparency International) and the Government Integrity Subjective Index (published by the Ministry of Justice in Taiwan) to identify the major sources of corruption. Finally, this article emphasizes that Taiwan needs to exert greater effort on promoting integrity and fighting against corruption, especially with a focus on the elected officials and political appointees. In this process, the citizens cannot rely upon their agents, but must play a more active and aggressive role in democratic governance.
期刊論文
1.余致力、陳敦源、黃東益(20030400)。非政府組織與反貪腐運動:國際透明組織與臺灣透明組織簡介。國家政策論壇,92(夏),39-62。  延伸查詢new window
2.Karl, B.(1987)。The American Bureaucrat: A History of Sheep in Wolves Clothing。Public Administration Review,47(1),26-34。  new window
3.Rose-Ackerman, S.(1998)。Lessons from Italy for Latin America。Journal of Public and International Affairs,9(Fall),447-469。  new window
4.孟維德(2001)。一個治安公共政策上的新議題:政府犯罪。公共行政暨政策學報,32,81-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Meier, Kenneth J.(1997)。Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy。Public Administration Review,57(3),193-199。  new window
6.余致力(20000100)。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色--黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示。公共行政學報,4,1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Finer, Herman(1941)。Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government。Public Administration Review,1(4),335-350。  new window
會議論文
1.許濱松、余致力、金士先(2004)。如何落實公務員利益迴避作為。廉政研討會,(會議日期: 11月3日)。臺北:臺灣透明組織:臺北市政府法規會:臺北市政府。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Kaufmann, Daniel、Kraay, Aart、Mastruzzi, Massimo(2005)。Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004。Washington, DC:The World Bank。  new window
圖書
1.Redford, Emmette S.(1969)。Democracy in the Administrative State。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Starling, G.(1998)。Managing the Public Sector。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishers。  new window
3.Levine, C. H.、Peters, B. G.、Thompson, F. J.(1990)。Public Administration: Challenges, Choice, Consequences。Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman。  new window
4.Mosher, Frederick C.(1968)。Democracy and the Public Service。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.臺灣透明組織(2006)。全球貪腐趨勢指數,http://www.ti-taiwan.org/ch.files/index-1.htm, 2006/09/15。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣透明組織(2006)。法務部 92 至 94 年廉政指標民意調查研究結果,http://www.ti-taiwan.org/ch.files/pdf.files/950530pdf.pdf, 2006/9/15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Friedrich, C. J.(1966)。The Nature of Administrative Responsibility。Public Administration and Policy。Harper Torch Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE