臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：政黨認同如何影響民衆對政府清廉的評價
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：莊文忠 引用關係／徐明莉／黃東益 引用關係／李仲彬 引用關係
作者(外文)：Juang, Wen-jong／Hsu, Ming-li／Huang, Tong-yi／Lee, Chung-pin
出版日期：2017
卷期：35:1
頁次：頁93-141
主題關鍵詞：清廉；貪腐；政黨認同；政治環境；民意調查；Integrity；Corruption；Party identification；Political environment；Opinion poll
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:100
民主政治是討論與解決公共事務的制度設計，提供人民參與決策的機會，但並不保證會產生廉能政府，廉潔治理 (integrity governance) 乃成為多數人民的期待與政府的正當性基礎，因之，吾人除了瞭解政府如何致力於宣導反貪觀念、設計防貪機制及掃除貪腐弊端外，民眾如何認知政府的清廉表現及其影響因素，亦值得探究。台灣在民主化過程中，大多數民眾都曾經歷地方或中央政府層級的政黨輪替執政經驗，他們對政府的清廉評價是否仍受政黨因素所影響，值得吾人採取循證途徑探索之。本研究利用全國性民意調查資料，以政府的清廉評價為依變數，利用個人和環境層次的政黨因素作為解釋變數，分析政黨因素是否為影響民眾對政府清廉評價的主因。實證分析發現，個人的政黨認同依然具有顯著解釋力，認同泛藍政黨者傾向對泛藍主政的政府給予較高的清廉評價，認同泛綠政黨者傾向給予較不清廉的評價，證實民眾仍難以跳脫其個人心中「藍綠」的政治框架；而環境層次的政黨因素則不具顯著解釋效果。此外，本研究也發現，民眾對政府的清廉評價與政府施政滿意度、政治信任之間有高度的關聯性，說明了民眾對政府的施政評價與信任程度也會影響其對政府的清廉印象。
Democracy is the institution designed to discuss and solve public issues, providing the public with opportunity to participate in the policy-making process. This institution, however, does not guarantee the integrity and effectiveness of government. Integrity governance becomes the expectation of the public and the foundation of the legitimacy of government. Therefore, other than understanding government’s effort in anti-corruption campaigns, anti -corruption mechanism and eradication, the public’s perception of government integrity and its influence are worth study. Such studies could increase our knowledge about the public’s understanding of government’s anti-corruption measures, whether these measures eliminate the public's concern of corruption and improve the public’s trust in government. Due to the fast pace of democratization in Taiwan, the public has experienced political party alternation in loc al and central governments. Whether party factor affects the public’s perception of government integrity worth the effort in evidence-based studies. This study uses public opinion polls conducted nation-wide in Taiwan to test three models. In the models, integrity perception towards ＂the government as whole,＂ ＂President Ma＂ and ＂central government＂ are dependent variables in each model, while the individual and environmental level of party factors are main variables. Empirical analysis shows party identification has significant influence, people who have leanings toward the pan-blue coalition tend to give higher integrity ratings to governments run by the KMT (blue party), but the people who have leanings towards the pan-green party tend to give lower integrity ratings, which proves that it is difficult for the public in Taiwan to think outside of the ＂Blue-Green＂ political framework. However, the environmental level of party factors seems to have a less significant influence. This study also finds that public satisfaction and trust with government significantly influences their integrity perception.
期刊論文
1.林向愷(20080900)。貪腐與民主。臺灣民主，5(3)，167-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Warren, M. E.(2004)。What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?。American Journal of Political Science，48(2)，328-343。  new window
3.蘇毓昌、胡龍騰(20130600)。誰能容忍貪腐？。臺灣民主，10(2)，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳敦源、蔡秀涓(20060900)。國家發展的倫理基礎：反貪腐與公職人員倫理準則。臺灣民主季刊，3(3)，185-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱瑞忠(20000400)。行政官僚貪污防治之途徑--行政倫理的思考。東海社會科學學報，19，97-120。  延伸查詢new window
6.Jones, Kelvyn、Johnston, Ron J.、Pattie, Charles J.(1992)。People, Places and Regions: Exploring the Use of Multi-Level Modelling in the Analysis of Electoral Data。British Journal of Political Science，22(3)，343-380。  new window
7.陳陸輝、耿曙(20080300)。政治效能感與政黨認同對選民投票抉擇的影響--以2002年北高市長選舉為例。臺灣民主，5(1)，87-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.徐永明、林昌平(20080600)。統計方法與理論驗證的謬誤相關：以政治版圖變遷的研究為例，1989-2004。東吳政治學報，26(2)，83-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭怡靖、黃紀(20100900)。單一選區兩票制下的一致與分裂投票--2008年立法委員選舉的探討。臺灣民主，7(3)，1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Johnson, Martin、Shively, Philip、Stein, Robert(2002)。Contextual Data and the Study of Elections and Voting Behavior: Connecting Individuals to Environments。Electoral Studies，21(2)，219-233。  new window
11.Anderson, Christopher J.、Tverdova, Yuliya V.(2003)。Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies。American Journal of Political Science，47(1)，91-109。  new window
12.You, Jong-Sung、Khagram, Sanjeev(2005)。A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption。American Sociological Review，70(1)，136-157。  new window
13.余致力(20060900)。倡廉反貪與民主治理。臺灣民主季刊，3(3)，165-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.余致力、莊文忠(2016)。測量與解釋民眾的貪腐認知：臺北市與高雄市的實證分析。公共行政評論，9(3)，21-41。  延伸查詢new window
15.Box-steffensmeier, Janet M.(2004)。The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap。American Political Science Review，98(3)，515-528。  new window
16.Canache, Damays、Allison, Michael E.(2005)。Perceptions of Political Corruption in Latin American Democracies。Latin American Politics and Society，47(3)，91-111。  new window
17.Davis, Charles L.(2004)。The Influence of Party Systems on Citizens' Perceptions of Corruption and Electoral Response in Latin America。Comparative Political Study，37，677-703。  new window
18.Holmberg, Sören(2009)。Perceptions of Corruption in Mass Publics。QoG Working Paper Series，24。  new window
19.Ledet, Richard(2011)。Correlates of Corruption: Rethinking Social Capital's Relationship with Government in the United States。Public Integrity，13(2)，148-162。  new window
20.Morris, Stephen D.(2008)。Disaggregating Corruption: A Comparison of Participation and Perceptions in Latin America with a Focus on Mexico。Bulletin of Latin American Research，27(3)，388-409。  new window
21.Morris, Stephen D.、Klesner, Joseph L.(2010)。Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence From Mexico。Comparative Political Studies，43(10)，1258-1285。  new window
22.邱靖鈜(20091200)。貪腐防制處方：政策工具觀。文官制度季刊，特刊，179-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.莊文忠、張順全(20130900)。公共行政領域碩士論文主題與方法的研究趨勢--多層次分析觀點。公共行政學報，45，75-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.余致力、蘇毓昌(20061200)。國家廉政體系的建構與測量。研考雙月刊，30(6)=256，44-54。  延伸查詢new window
25.林宗弘、韓佳(20080600)。政治貪腐的制度理論：以亞洲各國為例的分析。臺灣政治學刊，12(1)，53-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.彭立忠、張裕衢(20070900)。華人四地貪腐程度之比較--以「貪腐成因」為分析途徑。公共行政學報，24，103-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.陳俊明(20081200)。循證型的廉政政策研究：臺灣地區廉政指標民意調查。公共行政學報，29，133-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Bauhr, Monika、Oscarsson, Henrik(2011)。Public Perceptions of Corruption: The Prevalence and Moral Rejection of Corruption in Sweden。  new window
2.Roberta, Gatti(2003)。Individual Attitudes Toward Corruption: Do Social Effects Matter?。Washington, D. C.：The World Bank。  new window
3.黃東益(2011)。民眾對於政府清廉感受之成因分析。台北：行政院研考會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周應龍(2012)。臺灣南部綠色政治版圖之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Manski, Charles F.(1995)。Identification Problems in the Social Sciences。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Hennessy, Bernard C.(1985)。Public Opinion。Belmont, CA：Brooks Cole Publishing Company。  new window
3.Huntington, Samuel P.(1991)。The Third Wave: Democratization in Late Twentieth Century。Norman：University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
4.Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、Berelson, Bernard、Gaudet, Hazel(1968)。The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Bull, Martin J.、Newell, James L.(2003)。Corruption in Contemporary Politics。Gordonsville, VA：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
6.Alatas, Syed H.(1991)。Corruption: Its Nature, Cause and Functions。Malaysia：S. Abdul Majeed & Co Press。  new window
7.Erikson, Rorbet S.、Tedin, Kent L.(2007)。American Public Opinion。New York：Pearson Publishers。  new window
8.Gong, Ting、Ma, Stephen K.(2009)。Preventing Corruption in Asia-Institutional Design and Policy Capacity。New York：Routledge。  new window
9.Kidd, John、Richter, Frank-Jurgen(2003)。Fighting Corruption in Asia: Causes, Effects and Remedies。World Scientific Publishing。  new window
10.Lee-Chai, Annette Y.、Bargh, John A.(2001)。The Use and Abuse of Power: Multiple Perspectives on the Causes of Corruption。Philadelphia：Psychology Press。  new window
11.Richter, William L.、Burke, Frances(2007)。Combating Corruption, Encouraging Ethics: A Practical Guide to Management Ethics。Plymouth：Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
12.Sampford, Charles(2006)。Measuring Corruption。England：Ashgate Publishing Limited。  new window
13.Rose-Ackerman, Susan(1999)。Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Transparency International(2014)。What is Corruption?，https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/。  new window
2.陳俊明(2006)。法務部95年台灣地區廉政指標民意調查第二次調查報告書，台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳俊明(2007)。法務部96年台灣地區廉政指標民意調查第二次調查報告書，台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳俊明(2008)。法務部97年地方政府廉政狀況調查報告書，台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳俊明(2009)。法務部98年台灣地區廉政指標民意調查第二次調查報告書，台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳俊明(2010)。法務部99年台灣地區廉政指標民意調查第二次調查報告書，台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.余致力、蘇毓昌(2011)。國家廉政體系與測量。廉政與治理。臺北：智勝。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝雨生(2012)。多層次分析。社會及行為科學研究法：資料分析。台北：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊文忠(2011)。廉政認知與民主治理。廉政與治理。臺北：智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ivanov, K.(2009)。Fighting Corruption Globally and Locally。Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration: Concepts and Cases。New York：M. E. Sharpe, Inc。  new window
5.Van de Walle, Steven(2008)。Perceptions of Corruption as Distrust? Cause and Effect in Attitudes Toward Government。Ethics and Integrity of Governance: Perspectives Across Frontiers。Cornwall：Edward Elgar。  new window
6.Yu, Chilik(2009)。Evolving Perceptions of Government Integrity and Changing Anticorruption Measures in Taiwan。Preventing Corruption in Asia: Institutional Design and Policy Capacity。Abingdon, Oxon：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：761（臺灣：758，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67143857
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上