:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:通識課程的教學與評量--以「性別教育專題」為例
書刊名:國立高雄海洋科大學報
作者:劉素芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Su-fen
出版日期:2005
卷期:20
頁次:頁119-143
主題關鍵詞:技術學院性別教育教學評量EvaluationGender educationInstructionTechnical college
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:33
本研究之目的在瞭解學生對性別教育通識課程之教學設計及成績評量之看法。研究對象為臺灣南部一所技術學院所開設的「性別教育專題」通識課程。質性和量化資料結果顯示(一)有71%的學生因為興趣而修習性別教育課程。(二)在未修此課前有61%的學生從未修過有關兩性主題之課程。(三)有70%的學生想從此門課學到兩性交往之知識。(四)學生對演講內容的喜好偏向愛戀追求、分手藝術之議題,不喜歡太抽象或太理論之內容(五)學生最喜歡的課堂活動是聽演講和小組討論,最不喜歡的是期末考試。(六)有64%的學生認為成績評量的項目與比重恰當,不需調整。(七)男學生的學期成績顯著的比女學生低(t=-4.17,p<.01),其差異主要是因為男學生的平時成績比女學生差的關係(t=-4.55,p<.01)。
The purpose of this study was to investigate college students' opinions about the instruction and evaluation methods of a gender education course. The course was offered as a general education class at a technical college in southern Taiwan. A total of 61 junior and senior students enrolled in the class. Data were collected from interviews, questionnaires and student grades report. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to analyze the data. The results showed that (1) A total of 71% of the students took the class because of their interest in the content. (2) Prior to this class, 57% of the students have never taken any class related to gender issues. (3) A 70% of the students expressed their expectation to learn from the class the knowledge and skills in maintaining satisfactory relationship with their intimate partners. (4) The most favorite topic was the one related to love, courtship, and break-up. Students enjoyed this topic because the speaker was very humorous. They did not appreciate abstract and philosophical topics. (5) In addition to lectures, small group discussion was students' favorite class activity. On the contrary, they liked the final examination the least. (6) A 64% of the students agreed with the evaluation criteria. (7) Male students scored significantly lower in the final scores than their female counterparts (t=-4.17,p<.01) and the source of difference came from students' regular performance in the class. (t=-4.55,p<.01). In addition to the discussion of significant differences, the conclusion and suggestions were also included in this article as well. For promoting students' understanding of gender equality, it is necessary for technical colleges to offer more gender education courses.
期刊論文
1.蘇芊玲(20010600)。教什麼﹖怎麼教﹖--通識課程「性別文化研究」的內涵與教學。通識教育,8(2),1-31。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳芬苓(20031200)。兩性平等教育在大學通識教育課程規劃之研究。實踐通識論叢,1,185-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃玲蘭(20021200)。通識教育中的「兩性教育」課程教學成效之評估--以某校「幸福婚姻與家庭講座」課程為例。元培學報,9,19-35。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉開鈴(20000800)。「性別與文學」通識課程設計與評估。兩性平等教育季刊,12,95-101。  延伸查詢new window
5.陸偉明、劉開鈴(19981100)。學生反思能力與性別角色態度的改變--「性別與社會」通識課程的教學成效。成功大學學報.人文.社會篇,33,209-218。  延伸查詢new window
6.Abrums, M. E.、Leppa, C.(2001)。Beyond cultural competence: Teaching about race, gender, class, and sexual orientation。Journal of Nursing Education,40(6),270-275。  new window
7.Bryant, A. N.(2003)。Changes in attitudes toward women's roles: Predicting gender-role traditionalism among college students。Sex Roles,48(3/4),131-142。  new window
8.Fujimura-Fanselow, K.(1996)。Women's studies and feminist pedagogy: Critical challenges to Japanese educational values, and practices。Gender and Education,8(3),337-352。  new window
9.Konrad, A. M.、Harris, C.(2002)。Desirability of the Bem sex-role inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans。Sex Roles,47(5/6),259-271。  new window
10.O'Sullivan, D. W.、Copper, C. L.(2003)。Evaluation active learning: A new initiative for a general chemistry curriculum。Journal of College Science Teaching,32(7),448-452。  new window
11.張珏、王舒芸、陳若璋(19970300)。通識教育中兩性關係課程之目標與精神。通識教育,4(1),1-24。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝臥龍(19970400)。從兩性平權教育的觀點探討教學互動歷程中的性別偏見。教育研究,54,37-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.魏慧美(19930500)。高師大學生性知識與性態度之調查研究。教育文粹,22,45-72。  延伸查詢new window
14.謝臥龍、莊勝發、駱慧文(19960400)。諮商員在諮商過程中對女性案主性別角色刻板印象之初探。測驗與輔導,135,2780-2783。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝小芩、王雅各(20000600)。經驗、發聲與性別政治--通識教育中的女性主義教學。通識教育,7(2/3),47-76。  延伸查詢new window
16.邱珍琬(20030500)。兩性教育與課程大綱舉隅。教育研究月刊,109,143-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李振清(2005)。Wharton School倫理必修課程凸顯的全球化時代公民教育意涵。第14屆全國通識教育教師研習會:大學通識教育中的公民教育與民主素養。台北:台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭崇趁(2000)。兩性平等教育實施策略。高中職教師兩性平等教育工作坊。台北:教育部。12-17。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.柯淑敏(2001)。兩性關係學。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari K.(1992)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.袁方(2002)。社會研究方法。臺北市:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE