:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:競選廣告策略初探--以2004年總統大選陳呂陣營為例
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:鈕則勳 引用關係
作者(外文):Niu, Tse-hsun
出版日期:2007
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁141-178
主題關鍵詞:競選廣告廣告功能論競選傳播策略選戰策略2004年總統選舉Campaign communicationPolitical advertisingThe 2004 electionCampaign strategyThe functional theory of political campaign discourse
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究旨在探討2004 年總統選舉陳呂陣營之競選廣告策略,理論及文獻部分則是以競選廣告論述之功能論為基礎,綜合近年來國內外相關文獻與本研究案例進行討論。研究方法採內容分析法及深入訪談法,以內容分析法分析陳呂陣營依普查而得之電視及報紙競選廣告,觀察其競選策略,進而配合深入訪談法來輔助說明陳呂陣營電視廣告之策略。本研究發現,陳呂陣營之電視及報紙廣告,正面廣告皆多於負面廣告,顯示執政者之防禦策略,仍是其競選廣告策略之主要考量;從廣告主題來看,陳呂之廣告電視部份以形象為主,從報紙來看,則以政策議題為主。以政策議題來看,電視廣告以正面政績類型較多,符合執政者策略;報紙廣告部份,則以訴求公民投票為主的一般政策目標類型廣告居多。以形象特質而言,電視廣告置焦於個人特質者最多;報紙廣告部份,以理念價值者較多。
This study focuses mainly on the advertising strategies in the DPP’s campaign for the 2004 presidential election. This case study is based on the theory and literature of the functional theory of political campaign discourse. At the same time, it synthesizes a selection of relevant, recent literature. The study adopts both a content analysis method and an in-depth interview method. Through the former, the study analyzes the DPP’s television and newspaper campaign advertisements, and through the latter, it explains the DPP’s TV campaign advertising strategies. The results show a greater number of positive TV and newspaper advertisements than negative ones, revealing that defensive strategies are still the main line of thought for the DPP candidates. There are two kinds of strategies for the themes of the advertisements. The television advertisements appeal to the candidates’ character. The newspaper advertisements deal with policies and issues. The majority of the TV advertisements highlight the candidates’ achievements, as well as how those achievements fit the candidates’ strategies. The newspaper advertisements appeal to general policy targets, such as referendums, for example. In summary, the TV advertisements focus on the character of the candidates, while the newspaper advertisements tend to address ideas and values.
期刊論文
1.Benoit, William L.、Airne, David(2005)。Political Television Advertising in Campaign 2000。Communication Quarterly,53(4),473-492。  new window
2.Benoit, W.L.(2000)。A Functional Analysis of Political Advertising across Media。Communication Studies,51(3),274-295。  new window
3.Benze, J. G.、Declercq, E. R.(1985)。Content of Television Political Spot Ads for Female Candidates。Journalism Quarterly,62,278-283。  new window
4.Devlin, L. P.(1989)。Contrasts in Presidential Campaing Commercials of 1988。American Behavioral Scientist,32,389-414。  new window
5.Hansen, G. J.、Benoit, W. L.(2002)。Presidential Television Advertising and Public Policy Priorities, 1952-2000。Communication Studies,53(3),284-296。  new window
6.Jamieson, K. H(1989)。Context and the Creation of Meaning in the Advertising of the 1988 President Campaign。American Behavioral Scientist,32(4),415-424。  new window
7.Joslyn, R. A.(1980)。The Content of Political Spot Ads。Journalism Quarterly,57(1),92-98。  new window
8.Kaid, L. L.、Johnston, A.(199109)。Negative versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaign, 1960-1988。Journal of Communication,41(3),53-64。  new window
9.Lee, c.、Benoit, W. L.(2004)。A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Spots: A Comparison of Korean and American Ads。Communication Quarterly,52(1),68-79。  new window
10.Payne, J. G.、Baukus, R. A.(1988)。Trend Analysis of 1984 GOP Senatorial Spots。Political Communication and Persuasion,5(3),161-177。  new window
11.Benoit, William L.、Airne, David(2005)。Issue Ownership for Non-Presidential Television Spots。Communication Quarterly,53(4),493-503。  new window
12.James, K. E.、Hensel, P. J.(1991)。Negative advertising: The malicious strain of comparative advertising。Journal of Advertising,20(2),53-69。  new window
13.Johnston, A.、White, A. B.(199406)。Communication Styles and Female Candidates: A Study of the Political Advertising during the 1986 Senate Elections。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,71(2),321-329。  new window
14.Brazeal, L. M.、Benoit, W. L.(2001)。Functional Analysis of Congressional Television Spots, 1986-2000。Communication Quarterly,49(4),436-454。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭自隆(2000)。二〇〇〇年台灣總統大選競選文宣觀察。第八屆廣告暨公共關係學術與實務研討會,國立政治大學藝文中心國際會議廳 (會議日期: 2000年4月29日)。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭自隆(2000)。2000年總統大選三組候選人電視廣告表現與文宣策略關聯性之分析。公元2000年總統選舉:傳播、行銷暨策略理論與實務學術研討會。臺北:世新大學民意調查研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wimmer, R. D.、Dominick, J. R.(1994)。Mass media Research。C. A.:Wadsworth。  new window
2.Benoit, William L.(1999)。Seeing Spots: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Advertisements, 1952-1996。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
3.Diarnond, E.、Bates, S.(1984)。The Spots: The Rise of Political Advertising on Television。MA:MIT Press。  new window
4.Levine, Myron A.(1995)。Presidential Campaigns and Elections: Issues and Images in the Media Age。Itasca, IL:Peacock Publishers。  new window
5.Johnson-Cartee, K. S.、Copeland, G. A.(1993)。Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.鈕則勳(2002)。競選傳播策略:理論與實務。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Holsti, Ole R.(1969)。Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities。Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.。  new window
8.鄭自隆(19950000)。競選廣告:理論、策略、研究案例。臺北市:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Wechsler, H.(1998)。The 1996 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective。The 1996 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective。Westport, CT。  new window
10.Kahn, Kim Fridkin、Kenney, Patrick J.(1999)。The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns。The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns。Princeton, NJ。  new window
11.鈕則勳(2006)。2004年大選國親聯盟競選廣告效果分析。政治傳播與競選策略。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Benoit, William L.(2001)。Presidential Campaign Rhetoric: Does It Matter?,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE