:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:諮商督導結盟歷程之初探研究:以一對督導為例
書刊名:輔導與諮商學報
作者:張淑芬廖鳳池
出版日期:2007
卷期:29:1
頁次:頁67-85
主題關鍵詞:督導歷程督導工作結盟受督導者觀點Supervisory processSupervisory working allianceSupervisee's perspective
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:91
本研究旨在了解諮商督導結盟歷程,採發現式取向研究方法,針對一個督導配對的八次個別督導逐字稿以及八次訪談逐字稿進行分析,以發現受督導者觀點的督導結盟主題以及督導結盟歷程。研究結果為:受督導者觀點的結盟主題共有20類,形成督導結盟的歷程可分為四階段:(1)督導關係緣起:受督導者知覺到督導配對順利形成;(2)每次督導之前:受督導者預先準備;(3)每次督導之中:受督導者知覺到設定督導目標歷程、執行督導任務歷程、建立情感連結歷程三者交互出現。設定督導目標歷程包含督導者關切督導需求、受督導者期待專業建議,以及雙方目標越向一致;執行督導任務歷程包含督導者這方重新框架視野、建議諮商策略、給予正向回饋、處理個人議題、督導焦點依受督導者需求轉移,以及受督導者這方接受督導者想法、回饋督導效果、表達不同想法、積極參與督導;建立情感連結歷程包含督導者這方了解受督導者、支持陪伴、關心生活,以及受督導者這方信任督導者的專業能力、感到關係自在;(4)每次督導之後:受督導者知覺到滿足需求,再次預先準備,如此形成循環至督導正式結束。 本研究對諮商督導實務以及未來研究提出建議。
The purpose of this study was to explore the process of building supervisory alliance in counseling supervision. The researcher adopted the discovery-oriented methodology to collect data from 8 sessions of supervision, including transcriptions of supervision and transcriptions of the supervisee's interview. The way of open coding was used to analyze the transcriptions. The findings were as follows: The theme of the alliance was consisted of 20 categories, forming the four stages of alliance building: (a)The first stage was successful formation of the dyad in the very beginning stage; (b)The second stage was preparation before each supervision session; (c)The third stage was during each session which consisted of goal setting process, task implement process, and bond forming process. The goal setting process included the supervisor showed concern about the supervisee's need, the supervisee expected professional suggestion from the supervisor, and both party achieved agreement on goals. The task implement process included the supervisor's reframing the supervisee's view of points, suggesting counseling strategies, giving positive feedback, exploring personal issues, shifting supervision focuses, and also included the supervisee accepting the supervisor's ideas, giving positive feedback, expressing different ideas from the supervisor, and participating actively. The bond forming process included the supervisor's understanding, supportive, concerned, and the supervisee's trust and feeling comfortable about the relationship; (d)The forth stage was after each session. Because of fulfillment of needs, the supervisee prepared again and thus became a circle of alliance building. Suggestions about supervisors, supervisees and future research were discussed.
期刊論文
1.鄭如安、廖鳳池(20050600)。督導中重要事件內涵之分析研究。諮商輔導學報,12,35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bernstein, Bianca L.、Chen, Eric C.(2000)。Relations of Complementarity and Supervisory Issues to Supervisory Working Alliance: A Comparative Analysis of Two Cases。Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(4),485-497。  new window
3.Ladany, N.、Walker, J. A.、Melincoff, D. S.(2001)。Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure。Counselor Education and Supervision,40(4),263-275。  new window
4.Ladany, N.、Lehrman-Waterman, D. E.(1999)。The Content and Frequency of Supervisor Self-disclosures and Their Relationship to Supervisor Style and the Supervisory Working Alliance。Counselor Education and Supervision,38,143-160。  new window
5.Gaston, L.(1990)。The Concept of the Alliance and its Role in Psychotherapy: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations。Psychotherapy,27,143-153。  new window
6.Mahrer, A. R.(1988)。Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research: Rationale, aims, and methods。American Psychologist,43(9),694-702。  new window
7.Bordin, E. S.(1983)。A working alliance based model of supervision。The Counseling Psychologist,11(1),35-42。  new window
8.Efstation, J. F.、Patton, M. J.、Kardash, C. M.(1990)。Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision。Journal of Counseling Psychology,37(3),322-329。  new window
9.謝麗紅(20000600)。團體過程中工作同盟的變化及其與團體結果之關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報,21,63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳秀碧(19920600)。「Stoltenberg 的督導模式」在我國準諮商員諮商實習督導適用性之研究。輔導學報,15,43-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許韶玲(20040600)。受督導者對諮商督導過程的影響因素--從受督導者的知覺檢視。諮商輔導學報,10,31-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張娟鳳(20010400)。短期諮商的效能因素與工作同盟之研究。教育心理學報,32(2),71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Burke, W. R., Goodyear, R. K.,、Guzzard, C. R.(1998)。Weakenings and repairs in supervisory alliances: A multiple-case study。American Journal of Psychotherapy,52(4),450-462。  new window
14.Frieswyk, S. H., Allen, J. G., Colson, D. B., Coyne, L., Gabbard, G. O., Horowitz, L. M.,、Newsom, G.(1986)。Therapeutic alliance: Its place as a process and outcome variable in dynamic psychotherapy research。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,27,143-153。  new window
15.Horvath, A. O.,、Symonds, D. B.(1991)。Relationship between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis。Journal of Counseling Psychology,61,306-316。  new window
16.White, V. E.,、Queener, J.(2003)。Supervisor and supervisee attachment and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance。Counselor Education and Supervision,42,203-208。  new window
17.Zetzel, E.(1956)。Current concepts of transference。International Journal of Psycho- analysis,37,369-376。  new window
會議論文
1.翁令珍(2006)。諮商督導重要事件中督導者介入與受督導者知覺之分析研究:區辨模式為架構。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Smith, T. R., Younes, L. K.,、Lichtenberg, J. W.(2002)。Examining the working alliance in supervisory relationship: The development of the Working Alliance Inventory of Supervisory Relationship。Chicago, IL。  new window
學位論文
1.李偉斌(2002)。網路即時諮商中工作同盟--晤談感受與諮商員口語反應之歷程分析(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳斐娟(1996)。諮商歷程中的重要事件、工作同盟與諮商結果之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳慶福(1995)。諮商員和當事人在諮商過程中的同盟、口語反應模式與晤談感受之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許韶玲(1999)。受督導者督導前準備訓練方案的擬定及其實施對諮商督導過程的影響之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李筱蓉(1994)。初期晤談工作同盟的建立:治療者的意圖與反映模式分析。  延伸查詢new window
6.洪雅鳳(1995)。當事人依附、工作同盟與晤談感受之相關研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Horvath, A. O.(1982)。Working Alliance Inventory (Revised edition)。Vancouver, BC:Simon Fraser University。  new window
2.Horvath, A. O.、Greenberg, L. S.(1994)。The Working Alliance: Theory, Research, and Practice。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
3.Bernard, J. M.、Goodyear, R. K.(2004)。Fundamentals of clinical supervision。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon:Pearson Education。  new window
4.Neuman, William Lawrence(2003)。Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches。Allyn & Bacon Inc.。  new window
5.Alexander, L. B.,、Luborsky, L.(1986)。The Penn Helping Alliance Scales。The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook。New York。  new window
6.Bordin, E. S.(1994)。Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions。The working alliance:Theory, research and practice。New York。  new window
7.Constantino, M. J., Castonguay, L. G.,、Schut, A. J.(2000)。The working alliance : A flagship for the “scientist-practitioner” model in psychotherapy。Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know。Boston。  new window
8.Fleming, J.,、Bendeck, T.(1966)。Psychoanalytic supervision。New York。  new window
9.Gaston, L.,、Marmar, C. R.(1994)。The California psychotherapy alliance scales。The working alliance:Theory, research and practice。New York。  new window
10.Luborsky, L.(1976)。Helping alliance in psychotherapy。Successful psychotherapy。New York。  new window
11.Marmar, C. R., Horowitz, M. J., Weiss, D. S.,、Marziali, E.(1986)。The development of the Therapeutic Alliance Rating System。The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Henry, W. P.、Strupp, H. H.(1994)。The therapeutic alliance as interpersonal process。The Working Alliance: Theory, research, and practice。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE