臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：團體諮商工作同盟量表編製研究
書刊名：中華輔導與諮商學報
作者：謝麗紅 引用關係／林詠昌
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Lih-horng／Lin, Yung-chang
出版日期：2014
卷期：40
頁次：頁59-93
主題關鍵詞：工作同盟；團體氣氛；團體諮商；團體諮商工作同盟；團體凝聚力；Group climate；Group cohesion；Group counseling；Group counseling working alliance；Working alliance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1571
  • 點閱點閱:292
本研究旨在編製團體工作同盟量表，協助領導者了解與成員之工作同盟狀態，以發展為評估團體歷程之工具。研究者翻譯與修訂Marziali、Munroe-Blum與McCleary（1997）所編製之團體治療同盟量表（GTAS），藉由反覆翻譯法以及專家效度檢核形成預試量表，題項共為36題。量表針對團體諮商成員進行預試，共獲得有效問卷274份，預試所得資料進行鑑別力分析、項目分析，以及驗證性因素分析，將不適當的題目刪除後形成正式量表32題。正式量表評估團體諮商成員對於團體的工作同盟感受程度，共獲得有效問卷318份。研究結果顯示，本量表α係數為.95，經驗證性因素分析及考驗量表之收斂效度及區辨效度，並以團體氣氛量表、團體治療性因素量表－對團體正向的感覺分量表作為效標，進行效標關聯效度考驗。本量表與團體凝聚力之積差相關係數為.725，與團體氣氛量表之投入分量表.576，逃避.182，衝突-.267，整體而言具有良好之信度及效度。本量表在內容向度因素上分為：目標、任務、聯結，在人際系統向度上分為：成員與領導者、其他成員與領導者、成員與其他成員、及整個團體與領導者的關係，為3×4之因素矩陣。最後，本研究針對量表應用，以及後續研究進行討論並提出相關建議。
The purpose of this study is to develop a group counseling working alliance scale (GCWAS), which helps the group leaders understand their working alliance with members and can be used as a measure to evaluate the group process. By the translation and back translation method and expert validity check, the authors translated and modified the Group Therapy Alliance Scale (GTAS) originally developed by Marziali, Munroe-Blum, and McCleary (1997). There are 36 items in this original scale. Through a pilot study with 274 samples, only 32 items would be used in the formal scale after a factor analysis. A total of 318 participants were involved in this study to evaluate their attitude toward the group counseling working alliance. The results revealed that the Cronbach's α of the GCWAS was.95. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the fitting indices for this scale and validity was evaluated by the convergent validity and discriminant validity. A significant correlation was found between GCWAS and group climate. In addition, a significant correlation was found between GCWAS and the positive feeling for the group. The correlation between GCWAS and cohesion was .73. The correlation between GCWAS and engagement, avoidance, and conflict was .58, .18, and -.27 respectively. In general, GCWAS has sound psychometric property regarding its reliability and validity. Moreover, these results identified that the three domains in the Content Dimension are (a) Goal, (b) Task, and (c) Bond; the four domains in the Interpersonal Dimension are (a) Member and Group Leader, (b) Other Members and Group Leader, (c) Member and Other Members, and (d) Group and Group Leader relationships. These two dimensions form a 3×4 matrix. Finally, the implications of this scale and future research directions were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Abouguendia, M.、Joyce, A. S.、Piper, W. E.、Ogrodniczuk, J. S.(2004)。Alliance as a mediator of expectancy effects in short-term group psychotherapy。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice，8(1)，3-12。  new window
2.Bourgeois, L.、Sabourin, S.、Wright, J.、Wright, J.(1990)。Predictive validity of therapeutic alliance in group marital therapy。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，58(5)，608-613。  new window
3.Budman, S. H.、Soldz, S.、Demby, A.、Feldstein, M.(1989)。Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy。Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes，52(3)，339-350。  new window
4.Constantino, M. J.、Manber, R.、Ong, J.、Kuo, T. F.、Huang, J. S.、Arnow, B. A.(2007)。Patient expectations and therapeutic alliance as predictors of outcome in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia。Behavioral Sleep Medicine，5(3)，210-228。  new window
5.Gillaspy, J. A. Jr.、Wright, A. R.、Campbell, C.、Stokes, S.、Adinoff, B.(2002)。Group alliance and cohesion as predictors of drug and alcohol abuse treatment outcomes。Psychotherapy Research，12(2)，213-229。  new window
6.Glatzer, H. T.(1979)。The working alliance in analytic group psychotherapy。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy，28(2)，147-161。  new window
7.Horvath, A. O.、Greenberg, L. S.(1989)。Development and validation of the Working Allance Inventory。Journal of Counseling Psychology，36(2)，223-233。  new window
8.Johnson, D. P.、Penn, D. L.、Bauer, D. J.、Meyer, P.、Evans, E.(2008)。Predictors of the therapeutic alliance in group therapy for individuals with treatment resistant auditory hallucinations。British Journal of Clinical Psychology，47(2)，171-183。  new window
9.Joyce, A. S.、Piper, W. E.、Ogrodniczuk, J. S.(2007)。Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy，57(3)，269-296。  new window
10.Koch, L.、Egbert, N.、Coeling, H.(2005)。The working alliance as a model for interdisciplinary collaboration。Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation，25(4)，369-373。  new window
11.Lindgren, A.、Barber, J. P.、Sandahl, C.(2008)。Alliance to the group-as-a-whole as a predictor of outcome in psychodynamic group therapy。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy，58(2)，163-184。  new window
12.Lorentzen, S.、Sexton, H. C.、Hoglend, P.(2004)。Therapeutic alliance, cohesion and outcome in a long-term analytic group. A preliminary study。Nordic Journal of Psychiatry，58(1)，33-40。  new window
13.Marziali, E.、Munroe-Blum, H.、McCleary, L.(1997)。The contribution of group cohesion and group alliance to the outcome of group psychotherapy。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy，47(4)，475-497。  new window
14.McCallum, M.、Piper, W. E.、Ogrodniczuk, J. S.、Joyce, A. S.(2002)。Early process and dropping out from short-term group therapy for complicated grief。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice，6(3)，243-254。  new window
15.Pinsof, W. M.、Catherall, D. R.(1986)。The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual therapy scales。Journal of Marital and Family Therapy，12(2)，137-151。  new window
16.Piper, W. E.、Ogrodniczuk, J. S.、Lamarche, C.、Hilscher, T.、Joyce, A. S.(2005)。Level of alliance, pattern of alliance, and outcome in short-term group therapy。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy，55(4)，527-550。  new window
17.Taft, C. T.、Murphy, C. M.、King, D. W.、Musser, P. H.、DeDeyn, J. M.(2003)。Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，71(4)，812-820。  new window
18.Taft, C. T.、Murphy, C. M.、Musser, P. H.、Remington, N. A.(2004)。motivational predictors of the working alliance in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，72(2)，349-354。  new window
19.Woody, S. R.、Adessky, R. S.(2002)。Therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, and homework compliance during cognitive-behavioral group treatment of social phobia。Behavior Therapy，33(1)，5-27。  new window
20.Brown, P. D.、O'Leary, K. D.(2000)。Therapeutic alliance: Predicting continuance and success in group treatment for spouse abuse。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，68(2)，340-345。  new window
21.Bordin, E. S.(1979)。The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance。Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice，16(3)，252-260。  new window
22.Gaski, John F.、Nevin, John(1985)。The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in marketing channel。Journal of Marketing Research，22(2)，130-142。  new window
23.林美珠、王麗斐(19981200)。團體治療性與反治療性重要事件之分析。中華輔導學報，6，35-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.謝麗紅(20000600)。團體過程中工作同盟的變化及其與團體結果之關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報，21，63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Kivlighan, D. M.、Multon, K. D.、Brossart, D. F.(1996)。Helpful impacts in group counseling: Development of a multidimensional rating system。Journal of Counseling psychology，43，347-355。  new window
26.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin，103(3)，411-423。  new window
27.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research，18(1)，39-50。  new window
28.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
29.王麗斐、林美珠(20001200)。團體治療性因素量表之發展與編製。中華輔導學報，9，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Fuhriman, A.、Burlingame, G. M.(1990)。Gonsistency of matter: A comparative analysis of individual and group process variables。The Counseling Psychologist，18(1)，6-63。  new window
31.Johnson, J. E.、Burlingame, G. M.、Olsen, J. A.、Davies, D. R.、Gleave, R. L.(2005)。Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models。Journal of Counseling Psychology，52(3)，310-321。  new window
學位論文
1.Johnson, J. E.(2004)。Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models(博士論文)。University of Brigham Young，Utah, US。  new window
2.O'Farrell, M. K.(1986)。The effect of timing of goal setting on outcome in personal growth groups(博士論文)。University of Maryland，College Park。  new window
3.Schwartz, E.(2004)。Therapeutic alliance, group climate, and client self-efficacy: Influences on outcome in group therapy for driving anger reduction(博士論文)。University of Colorado，Colorado。  new window
4.謝麗紅(1995)。成長團體過程與團體效果之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳慶福(1995)。諮商員和當事人在諮商過程中的同盟、口語反應模式與晤談感受之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃芳銘(2009)。結構方程模式--理論與應用。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式Amos之簡介及其在測驗編制上之應用: Graphics & Basic。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.、Black, W. C.(1995)。Multivariate data analysis with readings。Upper Saddler River, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式：方法與實務應用。台北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.張偉豪(2011)。AMOS統計研究方法研習營--SEM論文寫作不求人。台北：鼎茂圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳正昌、程炳林(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.王文科、王智弘(2006)。教育研究法。五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Yalom, Irvin D.(1995)。The theory and practice of group psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
9.Diamantopoulos, Adamantios、Siguaw, Judy A.(2000)。Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bordin, E. S.(1994)。Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions。The working alliance: Theory, research and practice。NY：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Glatzer, H. T.(1990)。Psychoanalytic group psychotherapy。The group psychotherapist's handbook: Contemporary theory and technique。New York, NY：Columbia University。  new window
3.Horvath, A. O.、Greenberg, L. S.(1994)。Empirical validation of Bordin's pantheoretical model of the alliance: The working alliance inventory perspective。The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice。Oxford, England：John Wiley and Sons。  new window
4.Horvath, A. O.、Greenberg, L. S.(1986)。The development of the Working Alliance Inventory。The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook。New York, NY：Guilford。  new window
5.MacKenzie, K. R.、Safran, J. D.、Muran, J. C.(1998)。The alliance in time-limited group psychotherapy。The therapeutic alliance in brief psychotherapy。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
6.MacKenzie, K. R.(1983)。The clinical application of a group climate measure。Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice。New York, NY：International Universities Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1023（臺灣：1006，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67421303
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上