臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中文晤談評量問卷內部結構及信效度之探究：諮商心理師層次分析
書刊名：國立屏東大學學報.教育類
作者：陳慶福／劉嘉蕙 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Ching-fu／Liu, Chia-hui
出版日期：2019
卷期：3
頁次：頁111-143
主題關鍵詞：中文晤談評量問卷；內部結構；晤談影響；Chinese session evaluation questionnaire；C-SEQ；Internal structure；Session impact
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:3
晤談評量問卷（Session Evaluation Questionnaire, SEQ）過去經常被作為評量諮商影響的用途，最新版SEQ-5係由21對語意區分的相對應形容詞組成，各題項採1-7點評量的方式計分。本研究探討心理師在中文第五版晤談評量問卷（Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire, C-SEQ）的內部結構，以2017年4月至2017年7月間，在台灣34所大學諮商輔導中心的心理師N = 187為參與者，以每位參與者最近一次接案後所填答的一份C-SEQ，共計187份，探討心理師在C-SEQ的因素結構、C-SEQ的內部相關和內部一致性。研究結果：以C-SEQ晤談評量向度和晤談後情感評量向度各10題，進行探索性因素分析，結果顯示C-SEQ在晤談評量向度，和在晤談後情感向度分別包含：深度性、順暢性，以及正向性和覺醒性四個因素的結構，C-SEQ在深度性、順暢性和正向性間存有低度到中度的相關(rs = .16 - .64, ps ＜ .05)，以及C-SEQ四個因素具有中高度的內部一致性信度(α = .57-.87)，整體問卷具有高度的一致性信度(α = .87)。心理師層次的C-SEQ可作為諮商歷程實務和諮商研究之用途。
The Session Evaluation Questionnaire(SEQ) has been applied to measure the impact of counseling sessions. The SEQ Form 5 (the most recent version) includes 21 items in a 7-point bipolar adjective format. The items are divided into two sections: session evaluation and postsession mood evaluation. The stem 'This session was' precedes the first 11 items(session evaluation). The stem 'Right now I feel' precedes the second 10 items (postsession mood evaluation). The purpose of this research attempts to explore the internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation(C-SEQ) of counselor level. The C-SEQ data were collected in a heterogeneous convenience sample of 187 participants at 34 universities in Taiwan, with each participant completed one copy of C-SEQ over the course of her/his latest individual counseling, and data collecting were from April, 2017 to July, 2017. The findings of this study indicated that the counselors showed actual responses toward the C-SEQ. The results of this study suggested that four factors elicited from the C-SEQ were corroborated, namely Depth, Smoothness, Positivity, and Arousal. Thus, the C-SEQ is comprised of two dimensions of session evaluation, Depth and Smoothness, as well as two dimensions of postsession mood, Positivity and Arousal. The C-SEQ yields four factors. And intercorrelation among depth, smoothness and positivity of C-SEQ has been low to medium(rs = .16 - .64 , ps＜ .05). The internal consistency coefficients(Cronbach's α) of the four factors has been middle to high(α = .57 - .87), and the total internal consistency of the C-SEQ has been high(α = .87). The C-SEQ is available as an instrument for counseling practice and research.
期刊論文
1.江宛凌、陳慶福(20080900)。以塔羅牌為諮商媒介所引發低自尊當事人之重要事件與晤談感受初探研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，24，107-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cummings, A. L.、Slemon, A. G.、Hallberg, E. T.(1993)。Session evaluation and recall of important events as a function of counselor experience。Journal of Counseling Psychology，40(2)，156-165。  new window
3.Stiles, W. B.、Snow, J. S.(1984)。Counseling Session Impact as Viewed by Novice Counselors and Their Clients。Journal of Counseling Psychology，31(1)，3-12。  new window
4.桂川泰典、国里愛彦、菅野純、佐々木和義(2013)。日本語版セッション評価尺度（The Japanese Session Evaluation Questionnaire: J-SEQ）作成の試みカウンセラー評定による検討。ショートレポート，22(1)，73-76。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hartmann, A.、Leonhart, R.、Hermann, S.、Joos, A.、Stiles, W. B.、Zeeck, A.(2013)。Die Evaluation von Therapiesitzungen durch Patienten und Therapeuten Faktorstruktur und Interpretation des SEQ-D。Diagnostica，59(1)，45-59。  new window
6.Stiles, W. B.、Reynolds, S.、Hardy, G. E.、Rees, A.、Barkham, M.、Shapiro, D. A.(1994)。Evaluation and description of psychotherapy session by clients using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire and Session Impact Scale。Journal of Counseling Psychology，41(2)，175-185。  new window
7.Stiles, W. B.、Shapiro, D. A.、Firth-Cozens, J. A.(1988)。Do sessions of different treatments have different impact?。Journal of Counseling Psychology，35，391-396。  new window
8.Stiles, W. B.、Snow, J. S.(1984)。Dimensions of psychotherapy clinical session impact across sessions and across clients。British Journal of Clinical Psychology，23(1)，59-63。  new window
9.Hafkenscheid, A.(2009)。The impact of psychotherapy sessions: Internal structure of the Dutch Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ)。Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice，82，99-111。  new window
10.Mallinckrodt, B.(1993)。Session impact, working alliance and treatment outcome of brief counseling。Journal of Counseling Psychology，40，25-32。  new window
11.Stiles, W. B.(1980)。Measurement of the impact of psychotherapy sessions。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，48(2)，176-185。  new window
12.Thompson, B. J.、Hill, C. E.(1993)。Client perceptions of therapist competence。Psychotherapy Research，3，124-130。  new window
13.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika，39(1)，31-36。  new window
14.Grace, M.、Kivlighan, D. M. Jr.、Kunce, J.(1995)。The effect of nonverbal skills, training on counselor trainee nonverbal sensitivity and responsiveness and session impact and working alliance。Journal of Counseling and Development，73(5)，547-552。  new window
15.Reynolds, D. J.、Stiles, W. B.(2007)。Online data collection for psychotherapy process research。Cyber Psychology and Behavior，10(1)，92-99。  new window
16.Reynolds, D. J.、Stiles, W. B.、Grohol, J. M.(2006)。An investigation of session impact and alliance in internet based psychotherapy: Preliminary results。Counselling and Psychotherapy，6(3)，164-168。  new window
17.李偉斌、陳慶福、王智弘(20080900)。網路即時諮商與晤談諮商中助人技巧、工作同盟與晤談感受之研究--以準諮商員為例。教育心理學報，40(1)，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王麗斐、林美珠(20001200)。團體治療性因素量表之發展與編製。中華輔導學報，9，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳慶福、林妙容(2016)。諮商初期的晤談感受與諮商滿意關係之探究。2016學術與實務研討會--諮商與工商心理學的融合與應用，銘傳大學主辦 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖鳳池(1994)。諮商員自我認知對諮商關係暨諮商行為影響之研究(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.簡華妏(2007)。華人文化脈落中諮商與心理輔導專業工作者之反移情處理能力、孝道信念與順道行為對諮商效能的影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳慶福(1995)。諮商員和當事人在諮商過程中的同盟、口語反應模式與晤談感受之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.戴谷霖(2012)。婚姻受暴婦女知覺諮商中的重要事件及自尊、晤談感受與諮商滿意之成效(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wortzel, L.(1979)。Multivariate Analysis。New Jersey：Prentice Hall。  new window
2.郭生玉(1990)。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lepper, G.、Riding, N.(2006)。Researching the psychotherapy process: A practical guide to transcript-based methods。New York, NY：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Hair, J. F. Jr.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hill, C. E.、Lambert, M. J.(2004)。Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes。Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change。New York：John Wiley and Sons。  new window
2.Stiles, W. B.、Gordon, L. E.、Lani, J. A.(2002)。Session evaluation and the session evaluation questionnaire。Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.Orlinsky, D. E.、Rønnestad, M. H.、Willutzki, U.(2004)。Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and research。Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change。New York, NY：John Wiley and Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：647（臺灣：645，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67548924
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上