:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:蘇格拉底對話在哲學教育的應用--以團體討論為主的兒童哲學與哲學諮商為例的探討
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:潘小慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Hsiao Huei
出版日期:2007
卷期:34:9=400
頁次:頁39-60
主題關鍵詞:蘇格拉底蘇格拉底對話蘇格拉底方法雷歐納德.尼爾森兒童哲學哲學諮商自我導向學習哲學思考Leonard NelsonSocratesSocrates' dialogueSocrates' methodPhilosophy for childrenPhilosophical counselingSelf-oriented learningPhilosophical thinking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:81
「蘇格拉底對話」在當代獲得哲學諮商與心理治療領域的重視,本文探究蘇格拉底對話的理念與背景、理論根據、程序、特徵與規則,嘗試提出此一方法在哲學教育可有的應用。尤其,兒童哲學與哲學諮商二課程都有強調團體討論的面向,似乎更適於使用蘇格拉底對話。本文附錄以「何謂家人?」為探討主題,以蘇格拉底對話為探討方式,呈現一種哲學教育現場的可能性。
Socrates' Dialogue is highly estimated by contemporary scholars of philosophical counseling and psychotherapy, and this paper is to explore the ideas, background, rationale, procedure, features and rules of Socrates' Dialogue as well as attempt to propose possible applications of such a methodology in the education of philosophy. In particular, the courses of both philosophy for children and philosophical counseling are oriented toward the aspect of group discussion and therefore more suitable for the application of Socrates' Dialogue. Here in this article, we explore the question of “What is Family?” in the light of Socrates' Dialogue so as to present another possibility on the arena of the education of philosophy.
期刊論文
1.Overholser, J. C.(1993)。Elements of the Socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning。Psychotherapy,30(1),75-85。  new window
2.Overholser, James C.(1995)。Elements of the Socratic method: IV. Disavowal of knowledge。Psychotherapy,32(2),283-292。  new window
3.Overholser, J. C.(1993)。Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning。Psychotherapy,30(1),67-74。  new window
4.Overholser, J. C.(1994)。Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions。Psychotherapy,31(2),286-293。  new window
5.Overholser, J. C.(1996)。Elements of the Socratic method: V. Self-improvement。Psychotherapy,33(4),549-559。  new window
6.潘小慧(20040700)。「兒童哲學與倫理教育」之理論與實踐--以「偷.拿」一文為例的倫理思考。哲學論集,37,175-206+353-355。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.潘小慧(20040100)。哲學諮商的意義與價值:以「對話」為核心的探討。哲學與文化,31(1)=356,23-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Overholser, James C.(1999)。Elements of the Socratic Method: VI. Promoting Virtue in Everyday Life。Psychotherapy,36(2),137-145。  new window
9.Overholser, James C.(1992)。Socrates in the Classroom。College Teaching,40。  new window
10.Overholser, James C.(1987)。Facilitating autonomy in passive-dependent persons: An integrative model。Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy,17,250-269。  new window
學位論文
1.劉藍芳(2006)。蘇格拉底對話之教育意涵(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Johnson, Tony W.(1984)。Philosophy for children: An approach to critical thinking。Bloomington, Indiana:Phil Delta Kappa Educational Foundation。  new window
2.Vlastos, G.、Bumyeat, M. F.(1994)。Socratic Studies。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Lipman, Matthew、楊茂秀(2003)。靈靈。台北:毛毛蟲兒童哲學基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅納德•格羅斯、徐廮、李思凡(2005)。蘇格拉底之道--最充分地運用你的智慧的七把萬能鑰匙。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Marinof, Lou、吳四明(2001)。柏拉圖靈丹:日常問題的哲學指南。台北:方智。  延伸查詢new window
6.Rogoff, Barbara(1990)。Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Piaget, Jean。Les opérations logiques et la vie sociale。Études Sociologiques。Geneva:Librairie Droz。  new window
2.Saran, Rene、Neisser, Barbara(2004)。[Enquiring minds: Socratic Dialogue in education] Introduction。Enquiring minds: Socratic Dialogue in education。Store on Trent, England:Trentham Books。  new window
3.潘小慧(2006)。以兒童哲學的探究團體模式作為多元社會中的品德培育方案。多元文化與民主公民教育。臺北:公民與道德教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Piaget, Jean。Problèmes de la Psycho-sociologie de l'enfance。Etudes Sociologiques。Geneva:Librairie Droz。  new window
5.Overholser, James C.(1988)。Clinical utility of the Socratic method。Annals of clinical research。Des Plaines, IL:Forest Institute。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE