:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以權力與代理交互效果審視民間參與交通建設所需用地制度之研究
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:簡龍鳳賴宗裕 引用關係
作者(外文):Chien, Lung-fengLai, Tsung-yu
出版日期:2007
卷期:25:2
頁次:頁179-217
主題關鍵詞:民間參與自償能力權力與代理配置效率Private participationSelf-liquidating ratioAuthority and agencyAllocation efficiency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:131
  • 點閱點閱:46
「促進民間參與公共建設法」賦予民間機構從事開發交通建設所需用地,藉以提高交通建設之財務自償能力。回顧目前國內所推動之高速鐵路及捷運建設BOT案,均藉由土地開發收益以挹注建設成本,誠然所引發公共論壇的焦點環繞在「土地開發利益」議題上。由於政府與民間機構存在對土地市場價值資訊不對稱,衍生權力宰制與委託代理問題。本文嘗試在權力與代理交互效果下,建構政府、民間機構和土地所有權人三方關係,重新詮釋資源配置效率問題。研究顯示,政府倘若為滿足民間機構獲利之需求,因而向土地所有權人徵收「超額交通建設所需用地」,將加劇土地資源配置效率問題。
The “Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Public Infrastructure Projects” provides a mechanism for the private sectors to develop the land for any public infrastructure project in order to increase its self-liquidating ratio. The concept behind build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects in Taiwan, such as the Taiwan High-Speed Rail (HSR) and Taipei’s subway, the mass rapid transit (MRT) system, is to recoup the cost of the infrastructure project through land development revenues. Indeed, the public tends to be most concerned with the revenues, which depend on the institution and scale of development. As an asymmetry of information exists between the public and private sectors, issues concerning authority and agency may arise. This paper attempts to explore the allocation efficiency of resources among the government, the private sector, and landowners in terms of the interactive effects of authority and agency. I find that, should the government expropriate more land in order to meet the private sector’s demand for land development, the allocation of land resources will be less efficient.
期刊論文
1.簡龍鳳、賴宗裕(2006)。以代理理論觀點探討民間參與區段徵收開發之規模。都市與計劃,33(3),169-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Edelstein, M. R.(1986)。Disabling Communities: The Impact of Regulatory Proceedings。Journal of Environmental Systems,16(2),87-110。  new window
3.Davidoff, P.(1965)。Advocacy and pluralism in planning。Readings in planning theory,31(4),331-338。  new window
4.簡龍鳳(20031200)。公聽會式民意訴求捷運建設暨用地開發之分析。土地問題研究季刊,2(4)=8,48-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.簡龍鳳(20030900)。民間參與交通建設所需用地取得及開發之理論分析與議題探討。土地問題研究季刊,2(3)=7,75-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.簡龍鳳(20050700)。公共建設所需用地徵收比例原則之研究--論促進民間參與公共建設。土地經濟年刊,16,57-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Molotch, Harvey(1976)。The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place。American Journal of Sociology,82(2),309-332。  new window
8.Alchian, Armen A.、Demsetz, Harold(1972)。Production Information Costs, and Economic Organization。American Economic Review,62(5),777-795。  new window
9.Kahneman, Daniel E.、Knetsch, Jack L.、Thaler, Richard H.(1991)。Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias。The Journal of Economic Perspectives,5(1),193-206。  new window
10.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
11.Buchanan, J. M.(1975)。A Contract Ran Paradigm for Applying Economics。The American Economic Review,5,225-230。  new window
12.Sirmans, C. F.、Colwell, P. F.(1978)。Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban。Land Economics,54(4),514-519。  new window
13.Kernaghan, K.(1986)。Evolving Patterns of Administrative Responsiveness to the Public。International Review of Administrative Sciences,52,7-16。  new window
14.Dror, Y.(1967)。Policy Analysts: A New Professional Role in Government Service。Public Administration Review,27(September),197-203。  new window
15.Barnekov, T.、Rich, D.(1989)。Privatism and the Limits of Local Economic Development Policy。Urban Affairs Quarterly,25(2),212-238。  new window
16.Sawicki, D. S.(1989)。The Festival Marketplace as Public Policy: Guidelines for Future Policy Decisions。Journal of the American Planning Association,55,347-361。  new window
學位論文
1.林淑雯(1997)。區段徵收內公私有可建地開發時序及基地開發規模之研究:以高鐵新竹車站特定區為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Loewenstein, Karl(1957)。Political Power and the Governmental Process。Chicago, Illinois:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Boadway, Robin W.、Wildasin, David E.(1984)。Public Sector Economics。Boston, Massachusetts:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
3.行政院公共工程委員會(2001)。民間參與公共建設甄審作業參考手冊。臺北市:行政院公共工程委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Macho-Stadler, I.、P’erez-Castrillo, J. David(2001)。An Introduction to the Economics of Information: Incentives and Contracts。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Beatley, T.(1994)。Ethical Land Use。Ethical Land Use。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
6.North, Douglass C.(1980)。Structure and Change in Economic History。New York:London:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
7.蕭全政(200210)。政治與經濟的整合:政治經濟學的基礎理論。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.徐世榮(2001)。土地政策之政治經濟分析:地政學術之補充論述。臺北:正揚出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Stone, Deborah(1988)。Policy Paradox and Political Reason。New York:Glenview, IL:Harper-Collins:Scott, Foresman。  new window
10.羅傳賢(20020700)。立法原理,立法程序與技術。  延伸查詢new window
11.林森田(1996)。土地經濟理論與分析。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Gaventa, John(1980)。Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley。University of Illinois Press。  new window
13.Hay, Donald A.、Morris, Derek J.(1991)。Industrial Economics and Organization。Industrial Economics and Organization。N. Y.。  new window
14.Davis, L.、North, D. C.(1979)。Institutional Change and American Economic Growth。Institutional Change and American Economic Growth。New York, NY。  new window
15.Domhoff, G. W.(1986)。The Growth Machine and the Power Elite: A Challenge to Pluralists and Marxists Alike。Community Power: Directions for Future Research。Newbury Park。  new window
16.Transportation Research Board(2004)。Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experience, Challenges, and Prospects。Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experience, Challenges, and Prospects。Washington, DC。  new window
17.Moroney, R. M.(1981)。Policy Analysis within a Value Theoretical Framework。Models for Analysis of Social Policy: An Introduction。Norwood, NJ。  new window
18.Byrne, J.(1987)。Policy Science and the Administrative Status: The Political Economy of Cost-Benefit Analysis。Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE