:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:慧思禪觀體系中之般若觀行法門--以慧思傳記及其著作中對《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》之引用及詮釋為中心
書刊名:法鼓佛學學報
作者:王晴薇 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ching-wei
出版日期:2008
卷期:2
頁次:頁79-128
主題關鍵詞:慧思摩訶般若波羅蜜多經諸法無諍三昧法華經安樂行義般若觀行摩訶般若波羅蜜經諸法無諍三昧法門HuisiMohe bore boluomi jingPañcavimśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā-sūtraZhufa wuzheng sanmei famen(T46, no. 1923)Fahuajing anle xingyi(T46, no. 1926)Prajñāpāramitā meditation practice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:75
摘要 本文擬由兩個方向來探討慧思(515-577)禪觀體系中的般若思想,第一 是由慧思傳記中與《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》相關的記載來討論《摩訶般若波羅蜜 經》在慧思生命脈絡中的重要性。第二是由慧思對《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》及 《法華經》之詮釋之差異為起點,嘗試為天台禪觀體系提供一個新的思考面向 及解讀的角度。 在《續高僧傳》中的慧思傳,有兩個重要事件與《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》特 別有關,一是其在大蘇山期間,「以道俗福施,造金字《般若》二十七卷,金 字《法華》,琉璃寶函,莊嚴炫耀,功德傑異,大發眾心。又請講二經,即而 敘構,隨文造盡,莫非幽賾。」在此段敘述中,金字《般若經》被造出的時 間,似乎是早於《法華經》。 另一個與《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》有關之事件,是「後命學士江陵智顗,代 講金經,至一心具萬行處,顗有疑焉,思為釋曰:汝向所疑,此乃《大品》次 第意耳,未是法華圓頓旨也。吾昔夏中,苦節思此,後夜一念,頓發諸法,吾 既身證,不勞致疑。」由此段慧思與智顗師徒間的對話看來,《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》與《法華經》之間的關係及差異,正代表著天台思想中一個極為關鍵之 環節與昇進的轉折點,因此本文特別處理天台思想中一個極為重要,但卻被忽 略之問題:即在慧思著作中所見的《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》及其對《摩訶般若波 羅蜜經》之詮釋。以慧思對《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》及《法華經》之詮釋之差異 為起點,嘗試為天台思想提供一個新的思考面向及解讀的角度。 此外本文分析慧思之兩部重要著作,即《諸法無諍三昧法門》與《法華經 安樂行義》中對《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》之引用與詮釋。《諸法無諍三昧法門》 乃慧思以般若觀行為主之著作,而《法華經安樂行義》則呈現了慧思之法華觀 行。透過比較慧思如何在這兩部著作中對《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》作不同的引用 及詮釋,當可更深入理解慧思之禪修體系及其中的般若觀行法門。
Abstract This article is an investigation of Huisi’s reading of the Mohe bore boluomi jing 摩 訶般若波羅蜜經 (T8, no. 223; Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā-sūtra) through an analysis of Huisi’s biographies and his own writings. Two incidents in Huisi’s biographies suggest the importance of the Mohe bore boluomi jing in his meditation system. The first incident is his making of the Mohe bore boluomi jing in golden characters at Mt. Dasu. In this incident, it is mentioned that Huisi made both Mohe bore boluomi jing and the Lotus Sūtra. However, given the importance of the Lotus Sūtra in Huisi’s meditation system, one would be surprised to find that it is implied that Huisi made the Mohe bore boluomi jing in golden characters before his making of the Lotus Sūtra. The second incident involves a dialogue between Huisi and Zhiyi about whether one specific chapter of the Mohe bore boluomi jing is “sudden” or “gradual.” This dialogue reveals the difference between Huisi and Zhiyi’s understanding of the differences between these two sūtras, which are of utmost importance for what is later to be known as the Tiantai meditation system. With the questions raised by these two incidents as starting points, I attempt to analyze Huisi’s interpretation and practice of the Mohe bore boluomi jing, especially using his Zhufa wuzheng sanmei famen 諸法無諍三昧法門 and his Fahuajing anle xingyi 法華經安樂行義.
期刊論文
1.Leung, K.、Koch, P. T.、Lu, L.(1993)。A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia。Asia Pacific Journal of Management,19,201-220。  new window
2.Harrison, Paul Maxwell(2003)。Mediums and Messages: Reflections on the Production of Mahāyāna Sūtras。The Eastern Buddhist,35(1/2),115-151。  new window
3.王晴薇(20070600)。慧思禪觀思想中之「四念處」。佛學研究中心學報,13,1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳英善(1998)。慧思的禪觀思想與首楞嚴三昧。佛學研究中心學報,3。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王晴薇(20060600)。論中國早期天臺禪法中之四念處--由《念處經》到《諸法無諍三昧法門》的比較研究。漢學研究集刊,2,19-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林志欽(2006)。天臺宗祖師傳承之研究--從初祖到五祖。真理大學人文學報,4,47-77。  延伸查詢new window
7.Harrison, Paul(1995)。Searching for the Origions of the Mahayana: What Are We Looking For?。The Eastern Buddhist,28(1),57-63。  new window
會議論文
1.羅因(2001)。漢魏兩晉般若學經--論翻譯的考察。華梵大學第5次儒佛會通學術研討會。臺北:華梵大學哲學系。275-292。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡耀明(2001)。佛教研究的進路和方法。南投。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.杜曉玫(2001)。慧思教觀思想研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.釋妙麟(2007)。妙法蓮華經.安樂行品,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.道宣(撰)。高僧傳。  延伸查詢new window
2.釋大寂(2004)。非行非坐三昧之修學--以《摩訶止觀》、《覺意三昧》、《隨自意三昧》為文獻依據。北縣:百善書房。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.安滕俊雄、蘇榮焜(1998)。天臺學:根本思想及其開展。台北:慧炬出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.慧思(1988)。南嶽思大禪師立誓願文。東京:大藏出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
5.(梁)僧祐。出三藏記集。  延伸查詢new window
6.慧思。諸法無諍三昧法門。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳英善(1997)。天臺緣起中道實相論。臺北:Fa-ku Wen-hua Shih-yeh Ku-fen Yu-hsien Kung-ssu。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.慧獄(1979)。天臺教學史。臺北縣。  延伸查詢new window
9.菅野博史、Stevenson, Daniel(2006)。The Meaning of the Lotus Sutra's Course of Ease and Bliss: An Annotated Translation and Study of Nanyue Huisi's (515-577) Fahua jing anlexingyi。Tokyo。  new window
10.潘桂明、吳忠偉(2001)。中國天臺宗通史。南京:江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.涂歡秋(2006)。鳩摩羅什般若思想在中國。臺北:里仁出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.妙法蓮華經玄義。  延伸查詢new window
13.志磐(1988)。佛祖統紀。新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.止觀義例。  延伸查詢new window
15.(200905)。中阿含經。中華電子佛典協會。  延伸查詢new window
16.釋慧嚴(1998)。淨土概論。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.Robinson, Richard H.、郭忠生(1996)。印度與中國的早期中觀學派。正觀出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.鳩摩羅什。摩訶般若波羅蜜經。  延伸查詢new window
19.Robinson, Richard H.(1967)。Early Mādhyamika in India and China。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
20.Harrison, Paul M.(1990)。The Samadhi of Direct Encounter with the Buddhas of the Present-an Annotated English Translation of the Tibetan Version of the Pratyutpanna-Buddha-Sammukhavasthita-Samadhi-Sutra with Several Appendices Relating to the History of the Text。The Samadhi of Direct Encounter with the Buddhas of the Present-an Annotated English Translation of the Tibetan Version of the Pratyutpanna-Buddha-Sammukhavasthita-Samadhi-Sutra with Several Appendices Relating to the History of the Text。Tokyo。  new window
21.印順(1991)。初期大乘佛教之起源與開展。初期大乘佛教之起源與開展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.賴鵬舉(2007)。北傳佛教的般若學--論大乘佛教的起源。臺北:西蓮淨苑出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.冉雲華(1991)。中國早期禪法的流傳和特點。中國禪學研究論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(陳)慧思。隨自意三昧。  延伸查詢new window
2.智顗(1983)。摩訶止觀,臺北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.天臺九祖傳。  延伸查詢new window
4.釋仁聞(2007)。天臺思法華經安樂行義之研究─以禪定思想為論題。  延伸查詢new window
5.王晴薇(2007)。《高僧傳》與《法華三昧懺儀》中之「見佛」─「見佛」與大乘經論的詮釋及翻譯問題,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.妙法蓮華經。  延伸查詢new window
7.釋摩訶般若般羅蜜經覺意三昧。  延伸查詢new window
8.隋天臺智者大師別傳。  延伸查詢new window
9.高僧傳。  延伸查詢new window
10.三論宗章疏。  延伸查詢new window
11.大智度論疏。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE