:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:愛情躲避球:四位男同志面對異女追求之經驗探究
書刊名:性學研究
作者:謝坤霖楊幸真 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Kun-linYang, Hsing-chen
出版日期:2010
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:男同志追求異性戀常規愛情關係GayPursuitHeteronormativityLove relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:100
  • 點閱點閱:168
當男同志被異女追求,會擦出什麼樣的火花?他如何在異性戀預設的注視下,對她作出適切的回應?他在追求關係中的回應與互動,又會受到哪些既存的社會文化與社會結構的影響?本研究以男同志受到異女追求的經驗爲主題,運用解釋性互動論爲研究方法,探究四位男同志在日常生活中面對異性追求時的情感互動與回應方式,同時描繪其內心思索與切身考量,並解析經驗背後的個人與社會意義。 本研究發現,男同志面對異性追求的過程中,他們會有意識的善用異性戀關係中常見的愛情腳本與性別特質論述作爲掩護,再以柔軟的力道表示婉拒,讓雙方的關係得以保持在他可以掌握的狀態裡。對男同志而言,有意識的「遵守」異性戀愛情常規與論述意義,是一種「反將一軍」對抗異性戀結構的有效方式。而刻畫著性別意識形態的異性戀愛情常規或許是一個癟腳的腳本,但它卻也提供了男同志投入私密性的親密關係互動時一個可改變的參考架構。當男同志進入了這樣的架構之後,除了能夠從實際的互動經驗中獲得第一手情感知識,並在過程中更清楚自我的情慾狀態與性身份的主體認同之外,也創造出一種不同性身份者之間的特殊相處模式,轉化了原本深藏其中的出櫃風險與拒絕的傷害性,成爲男同志在異性戀社會中愈益成長、立足的重要契機。
What kind of chemistry would be created when a gay man faces the courtship from a heterosexual woman? How does he make proper responses to her wooing under the gaze of heterosexual society? The experiences of gay men pursued by heterosexual women being the theme, this study uses interpretive interactionism to explore the love-sexuality relations and emotional interactions that four homosexual men experienced when they are pursued by heterosexual women in their daily lives. This study describes their inner worlds and their experiences of doing intimacy relations and ways of responses. It also analyzes the personal and social meanings behind those reactions. The study found when facing the pursuit of the opposite sex, the four gay men will make the best use of the script on gender and common characteristics of the heterosexual relationship as a shield, and then decline with soft words, let the bilateral relations be able to maintain in the condition which he may grasp. For them, to comply consciously with the conventional heterosexual on the meaning of love is an effective way of "counterattack" against heterosexuality. The heterosexual love regulations that describe the gender ideology of conventional may be a poor script, but it also provides them a framework to engage with the intimacy relationship and interaction. In addition to learn the first-hand experience and knowledge, and more clearly in their own sexual desire and sexual identities, they also create a special model for the relationship between different sexual identities, thus diverts the risk and hurt resulting from coming out, and the model also becomes an important turning point for gay people to stand in the heterosexual community.
期刊論文
1.謝文宜(20060900)。臺灣同志伴侶親密關係發展的挑戰與因應策略。中華輔導學報,20,83-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝文宜、曾秀雲(20070400)。探討伴侶關係滿意度及其相關因素:比較已婚夫妻、未婚情侶與同志伴侶的差異。臺灣性學學刊,13(1),71-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.趙彥寧(20000600)。臺灣同志研究的回顧與展望--一個關於文化生產的分析。臺灣社會研究,38,207-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.畢恆達(20030500)。男同性戀與父母:現身的考量、策略、時機與後果。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,15,37-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Jackson, Stevi、傅大為、賴鈺麟、鄭安庭(20050700)。性別、性與異性戀情慾。婦研縱橫,75,88-96。  延伸查詢new window
6.Wittig, M.、魏淑美(1993)。異性戀思維。島嶼邊緣,9,48-52。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林志清(2007)。男伴男行-男同志伴侶生活經驗之探究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張歆祐(2006)。男同志伴侶關係發展歷程之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡孟哲(2007)。哥弟麻煩(Ge-DiTrouble)?台灣男同志情慾類型學初探(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張銘峰(2002)。彩虹國度之情慾研究--以中年男同志為例(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林光源(2006)。不被看見的存在--男同志愛情經驗敘說。國立台北教育大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.商予愷(2006)。大學男同志伴侶親密關係之研究。國立台中教育大學,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔣琬斯(2007)。女同志大學生的自我探索與親密關係。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭鈴諭(2003)。被單戀者的拒絕歷程研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Plummer, Ken(1995)。Telling sexual stories: Power, chang and social worlds。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.Jackson, S.(1999)。Heterosexuality in question。Sage。  new window
3.Calhoun, Cheshire、張娟芬(1997)。同女出走。臺北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Connell, R. W.(2002)。Gender。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
5.Mills, C. Wright(1959)。Sociological Imagination。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Giddens, Anthony、周素鳳(2001)。親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Denzin, N. K.、張君玫(1999)。解釋性互動論。臺北:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.周華山(1995)。同志論。香港上環:香港同志研究社。  延伸查詢new window
9.林賢修(1997)。看見同性戀。臺北市:開心陽光出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Jamieson, Lynn、蔡明璋(2002)。親密關係:現代社會的私人關係。臺北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jamieson, Lynn(1998)。Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies。Polity Press。  new window
12.張小虹(1996)。慾望新地圖:性別.同志學。臺北:聯合文學。  延伸查詢new window
13.Brown, B. B.、Feiring, C.、Furman, W.(1999)。Missing the love boat: Why researchers have shied away from adolescent romance。The development of romantic relationships in adolescence。Cambridge。  new window
14.Downey, G.、Bonica, C.、Rincon, C.(1999)。Rejection sensitivity and adolescent Romantic relationships。The development of romantic relationships in adolescence。Cambridge。  new window
15.Illouz, H.(2006)。Romantic love。Handbook of the new sexuality studies。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.張娟芬(1999)。「人盯人」式的父權。女性主義經典。台北市:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Diamond, L. M.、Savin-Williams, R. C.、Dube, E. M.(2000)。Sex, dating, passionate friendships, and romance: Intimate peer relations among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents。The development of romantic relationships in adolescence。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE