臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科技、民主與公民身份：安坑灰渣掩埋場設置爭議之個案研究
書刊名：臺灣政治學刊
作者：范玫芳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fan, Mei-fang
出版日期：2008
卷期：12:1
頁次：頁185-228
主題關鍵詞：公民身份；公民權；公民參與；在地知識；風險治理；掩埋場設置；Citizenship；Citizen rights；Citizen participation；Local knowledge；Risk governance；Waste facility siting
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:165
  • 點閱點閱:76
公民身份(citizenship)的概念在晚近的科技與環境爭論中逐漸受到重視。本文旨在介紹科技公民身份的理論並探討台北縣新店安坑一般事業廢棄物與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議個案，藉以對照呈現我國具科技爭議的環境決策運作問題。個案凸顯現有專家政治與科學理性的霸權，以及公民身份的實踐受到壓抑的問題；環境影響評估與決策過程缺乏對總污染量的全面考量以及對在地知識與經驗的肯認(recognition)；地方行動者挑戰了既有權力結構與決策的正當性，並捍衛科技公民的權利與其所追求的美好生活。本文主張授能(empower)公民檢視和質疑技術官僚與專家所主導的決策過程與框架，公民在地知識和經驗受到肯認，以及利害關係人之間真實的對話機制，將有助於改善風險治理並促進公民身份的實踐。
The concept of citizenship has become an increasingly important theme in technological and environmental debates. This paper introduces the theory of technological citizenship, examines the practice of citizenship in the context of the incinerator ash facility siting controversy in Ankeng, and highlights the current problems of environmental governance. The case shows the politics of experts and hegemony of scientific rationality, and the problem of constraints on the practice of citizenship. The environmental impact assessment process and decision-making lack a consideration of the total amount of endangerment and the recognition of local, contextualized knowledge and experiences. Local activists challenge the structure of power and legitimacy of the project, and fight for the rights of technological citizenship and the good life. This paper argues for the need to empower citizens to challenge the decision-making process dominated by technocracy and experts. Recognition of citizen knowledge and experiences as well as genuine dialogue among stakeholders will improve risk governance and facilitate the practice of citizenship.
期刊論文
1.范玫芳(20071000)。風險論述、公民行動與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議。科技、醫療與社會，5，43-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.梁文韜(20061200)。資訊時代下的公共治理：規範性電子公民身份論之初探。政治與社會哲學評論，19，1-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Frankenfeld, Philip J.(1992)。Technological Citizenship: A Normative Framework for Risk Studies。Science, Technology and Human Values，17(4)，459-484。  new window
4.Fiorino, Daniel J.(1990)。Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms。Science, Technology & Human Values，15(2)，226-243。  new window
5.杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(20071000)。風險溝通與民主參與：以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會，5，71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Wynne, B.(2003)。Seasick on the Third Wave?Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism。Social Studies of Science，33，401-417。  new window
7.Carolan, M. S.(2006)。Ecological Representation in Deliberation: The Contribution of Tactile Spaces。Environmental Politics，15(3)，345-361。  new window
8.蔡文川(20040900)。地方感：科際共同的語言與對臺灣的意義。中國地理學會會刊，34，43-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王俐容(20060900)。文化公民權的建構：文化政策的發展與公民權的落實。公共行政學報，20，129-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳其南、劉正輝(20050900)。文化公民權之理念與實踐。國家政策季刊，4(3)，77-88。  延伸查詢new window
11.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊，56，1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Renn, Ortwin、Burns, William J.、Kasperson, Jeanne X.、Kasperson, Roger E.、Slovic, Paul(1992)。The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications。Journal of Social Issues，48(4)，137-160。  new window
13.林國明、陳東升(20050900)。審議民主、科技決策與公共討論。科技、醫療與社會，3，1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Delanty, G.(1997)。Models of Citizenship: Defining European Identity and Citizenship。Citizenship Studies，1，285-303。  new window
15.Levidow, L.(2007)。European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，1，19-51。  new window
16.Shrader-Frechette, K.(2007)。Nanotoxicology and Ethical Conditions for Informed Consent。Nanoethics，1，47-56。  new window
17.Bromley, W.(1989)。Entitlements, Missing Markets, and Environmental Uncertainty。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，17，181-194。  new window
18.王景平、廖學誠(2006)。公共電視「我們的島」節目中環境正義與媒體地方感之分析：以「斯土安康」影集為例。地理研究，44，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Zimmerman, A.(1995)。Toward a More Democratic Ethic of Technological Governance。Science, Technology & Human Values，20(1)，86-107。  new window
20.Abraham, J.、Sheppard, J.(1997)。Democracy, Technocracy, and the Secret State of Medicines Control: Expert and Nonexpert Perspectives。Science, Technology & Human Values，22(2)，139-163。  new window
21.Ellison, N.(1997)。Towards a New Social Politics: Citizenship and Reflexivity in Late Modernity。Sociology，31(4)，697-717。  new window
22.Goven, J.(2006)。Process of Inclusion, Culture of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification。Science, Technology & Human Values，31(5)，565-598。  new window
會議論文
1.Moore, N.(2003)。Ecocitizens or Ecoterrorists? Environmental Activism in Clayoquot Sound, Canada。0。  new window
2.黃泓文(2005)。新店安坑反掩埋場過程報告。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Renn, O.、Graham, P.(2005)。Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach。Geneva。  new window
學位論文
1.江家慧(2003)。公民參與機制運用於政策規劃過程之研究：以雲林林內焚化廠設置過程為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Evanoff, R.(2002)。A Constructivist Approach to Intercultural Dialogue on Environmental Ethics，Lancaster, UK。  new window
3.王俊隆(2004)。民眾參與鄰避設施過程之研究：以竹南焚化廠及新店安坑一般事業廢棄物掩埋場為例，0。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋曉薇(2005)。企業 / 公民身份之名與實：臺資企業、地方政府與當地社區互動關係，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.O'Neill, Onora(2000)。Bounds of Justice。Cambridge, MA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Schlosberg, David(1999)。Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Parker, Gavin(2002)。Citizenships, Contingency and the Countryside: Rights, Culture, Land and the Environment。London, UK/ New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
4.Dobson, A.(2003)。Citizenship and the Environment。Citizenship and the Environment。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Zolo, Danilo、McKie, David(1992)。Democracy and Complexity: A Realist Approach。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
6.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Citizen Science。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Cole, J. W.、Foster, S. R.(2001)。From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement。New York, NY：New York University Press。  new window
8.Cole, J.、Foster, S.(2005)。Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
9.Beck, Ulrich(1999)。World Risk Society。Polity Press。  new window
10.Beck, Ulrich(1992)。Risk society: Toward a new modernity。London：Sage。  new window
11.Sandel, Michael J.(1998)。Liberalism and the Limits of Justice。New York。  new window
12.UNDP(1997)。Governance for Sustainable Human Development。N.Y.：UNDP。  new window
13.Mead, George Herbert、Morris, Charles W.(1934)。Mind, Self and Society。University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Dryzek, John S.(2000)。Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Wynne, B.(1996)。Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science。Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge, UK。  new window
16.Luhmann, N.(1981)。The Differentiation of Society。The Differentiation of Society。New York, NY。  new window
17.Kasperson, R.、Golding, D.、Kasperson, J.(1999)。Risk, Trust, and Democratic Thoery。Social Trust and the Management of Risk。London, UK。  new window
18.Allen, R.(1992)。Waste Not, Want Not: The Production and Dumping of Toxic Waste。Waste Not, Want Not: The Production and Dumping of Toxic Waste。London, UK。  new window
19.Barry, J.(2006)。Resistance is Fertile: From Environmental to Sustainability Citizenship。Environmental Citizenship。Cambridge, MA。  new window
20.Dobson, A.、Bell, D.(2006)。Environmental Citizenship。Environmental Citizenship。Cambridge, MA。  new window
21.Barrett, K.(2006)。Wrestling with Uncertainty: Genetically Modified Organisms。Precautionary Tools for Reshaping Environmental Policy。Cambridge, MA。  new window
22.Christoff, P.(1996)。Ecological Citizens and Ecologically Guided Democracy。Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship。London, UK。  new window
23.Szerszrnski, B.、Toogood, Mark(2000)。Global Citizenship, the Environment and the Media。Environmental Risks and the Media。London, UK。  new window
24.Yearley, S.(1995)。The Environmental Challenge to Science Studies。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。London, UK。  new window
25.Leach, M.、Scoones, I.、Wynne, B.(2005)。Science and Citizens。Science and Citizens。London, UK。  new window
26.劉暐廷(2005)。臺灣焚化灰渣處理策略。臺灣環境議題特論。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Fan, M. F.(2008)。Environmental Citizenship and Sustainable Development: The Case of Waste Facility Siting in Taiwan，0。  new window
2.李長平(2006)。臺北縣政府鼓勵民間機構興建營運一般事業廢棄物（含垃圾焚化灰渣）BOO最終處置場設置計畫之執行經驗，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Leach, Melissa、Scoones, Ian(2005)。Science and Citizenship in a Global Context。Science and Citizens。London：Zed Books。  new window
2.Winner, Langdon、方俊育、林崇熙(2004)。技術物有政治性嗎？。科技渴望社會。臺北：群學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Slovic, P.(1999)。Perceived risk, trust, and democracy。Social Trust and the Management of Risk。London：Earthscan。  new window
4.Miller, D.(2002)。Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups?。Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1386（臺灣：1381，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1563831 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67359406
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上