臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：女性主義轉移法律公、私界線之實踐：臺灣的性騷擾立法探究
書刊名：臺灣社會研究季刊
作者：陳素秋
作者(外文)：Chen, Su-chiu
出版日期：2009
卷期：76
頁次：頁7-55
主題關鍵詞：女性主義法學；公私界線；性騷擾；傅科；臺灣；Feminist jurisprudence；Public/private distinction；Sexual harassment；Foucault；Taiwan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:153
挑戰公、私界線是女性主義近年來對法律思想與體系，所提出重要且具影響力之批判，而此一女性主義法學挑戰也發生於台灣，並成功地影響了相關立法。然而，在這些女性主義法學主張落實為法律制度的過程裡，會與該社會場域中其他相關論述產生什麼樣的互動？這些互動又如何影響女性主義法學實現性別平等目的？這些議題的相關研究與討論目前似乎仍十分缺乏。 本文嘗試討論台灣社會中，女性主義因挑戰公、私界線，而發展出之法律論述實踐過程。以性騷擾為主題，檢視台灣性騷擾法律規範，以及相關立法過程中的各種討論。本文之分析由Foucault式觀點著手，亦即將特定法律規範之形成與運作，視為社會脈絡中的動態論述實踐，透過此觀點，除檢視此新論述中法律主體之形塑外，並重視分析此新論述如何與社會脈絡中其他論述競爭與協商，因而使原有論述被重新詮釋、甚至轉換等現象。 本文主張由於有著不同的公、私論述傳統，因此，雖然台灣引用了美國對於性騷擾的法律規範，但在此新論述形成與實踐過程中，台灣置換了美國用以正當化性騷擾立法的關係性自我之法律主體，並弔詭地開啟了國家進一步干預介入公民生活之場域，因而出現國家以道德規訓論述寄生於原來旨在實現性別平權之法律論述的現象。
One significant contribution of the feminist movement in advancing gender equality is to challenge established public/private distinctions in legal systems. Over the past two decades, such feminist jurisprudential challenges to the public/private distinction have successfully been incorporated in the form of legal regulations in Taiwan. However, to date very little research examines how, during the process of forging them into law and implementing them in practice, these arguments are negotiated or compete with correlative discourses in Taiwan, or how these processes affect the enforcement of gender equality. To explore these issues, this study focuses on the jurisprudence of sexual harassment in Taiwan. Employing a Foucaultian perspective, which conceives an article of law as a living discourse operated in context and practice, this paper examines the forms of legal subjects assumed in the enactment of new regulations, and how the struggles between competing discourses lead to unexpected transformations in the original law. This article argues that while sexual harassment regulation in Taiwan is highly influenced by American precedent, its translation into the context of a different Taiwanese public/private distinction has led, in practice, to the displacement of the very legal subject of the relational self which was originally employed to justify the jurisprudence of sexual harassment in America. The enactment of sexual harassment regulations also paradoxically creates a new field which enables the state’s surplus intervention into citizens’ lives, allowing the state’s moral disciplinary sanctions to sneak into a law intended to ensure gender equality.
期刊論文
1.焦興鎧(20030300)。美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判。歐美研究，33(1)，57-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(20010600)。美國最高法院與工作場所性騷擾之爭議。歐美研究，31(2)，325-420。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.MacKinnon, C.(1991)。Reflections on sex equality under law。The Yale Law Journal，100(5)，1281-1328。  new window
4.高鳳仙(2006)。性騷擾防治法之規範精神與施行願景（上）。台灣本土法學雜誌，79，32-44。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳敏倫(19990600)。我對訂立性騷擾刑法的意見。性/別研究，5/6，283-292。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳惠馨(20051000)。女性主義法學與性別主流化。律師雜誌，313，15-37。  延伸查詢new window
7.焦興鎧(20010400)。大專校園性騷擾所引起之法律爭議及其防治之道--美國經驗所提供之啟示。國立中正大學法學集刊，4，3-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.焦興鎧(20060500)。我國防治性騷擾法制之建構。法令月刊，57(5)，4-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Mackinnon, Catharine A.(1984)。Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence。Signs，8(4)，635-658。  new window
10.Warren, Samuel D.、Brandeis, Louis D.(1890)。The Right to Privacy。Harvard Law Review，4(5)，193-220。  new window
11.卡維波(1999)。性騷擾的共識建構與立法：對吳敏倫觀點的進一步討論。性／別研究：性侵害、性騷擾專號，vol.5-6，293-313。  延伸查詢new window
12.高鳳仙(2005)。性騷擾防治法立法期間爭議問題研究。全國律師，vol.9，9，63-75。  延伸查詢new window
13.高鳳仙(2006)。性騷擾防治法之規範精神與施行願景（上）。台灣本土法學雜誌，80，41-50。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1999)。委員會記錄/院會記錄。立法院公報，八十八卷第三十三期/第五十八期與第六十二期。  延伸查詢new window
15.(2001)。院會記錄。立法院公報，九十卷第五十八期。  延伸查詢new window
16.(2004)。委員會記錄/院會記錄。立法院公報，九十三卷第二十九期/第三十三期。  延伸查詢new window
17.(2004)。委員會記錄。立法院公報，九十三卷第四十五期。  延伸查詢new window
18.(2005)。院會記錄。立法院公報，九十四卷第六期。  延伸查詢new window
19.Danielson, C.(1999)。The gender of privacy and the embodied self: examining the origins of the right to privacy in U.S. law。Feminist Studies，25(2)，311-344。  new window
20.Hasian, M., Jr.(1995)。Remembering and forgetting: a postmodern interpretation of the origins of the 'right of privacy.”。Journal of Communication Inquiry，19(2)，33-49。  new window
21.Lever, A.(2000)。Must privacy and sexual equality conflict? A philosophical examination of some legal evidence。Social Research，67(4)，1137-1171。  new window
22.MacKinnon, C.(2000)。Privacy and equality: notes on their tension。The Tocqueville Review，21(2)，77-85。  new window
23.Morris, D.(2000)。Privacy, privation, perversity: toward new representations of the personal。Journal of Women in Culture and Society，25(2)，323-351。  new window
24.Wall, E.(2001)。Sexual harassment and wrongful communication。Philosophy of the Social Sciences，31，525-537。  new window
研究報告
1.(2005)。校園性侵害或性騷擾防治準則草案訂定計畫成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cohen, Jean L.(2002)。Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm。Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Benhabib, Seyla(1992)。Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics。Cambridge：New York：Polity：Routledge。  new window
3.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan-Smith, Alan(1970)。The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences。Tavistock Publications。  new window
4.Macpherson, Crawford Brough(1962)。The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.MacKinnon, Catharine A.、雷文玫、李金梅、賴慈芸(1993)。性騷擾與性別歧視：職業女性困境剖析。臺北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Young, Iris Marion(1990)。Justices and the politics of difference。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan-Smith, Alan M.(1972)。The Archaeology of Knowledge。Pantheon Books。  new window
8.Butler, Judith(1997)。Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative。New York：Routledge。  new window
9.黃克武(2005)。近代中國私領域觀念的崛起與限制。公私領域新探：東亞與西方觀點之比較。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Allen, A. L.(1996)。Privacy at home: The twofold problem。Revisioning the political: Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory。Boulder, CO。  new window
11.Allen, A. L.(1997)。The jurispolitics of privacy。Reconstructing political theory: Feminist perspectives。University Park, PA。  new window
12.Boling, P.(1996)。Privacy and the politics of intimate life。Ithaca, NY。  new window
13.Eisenstein, Z.(1996)。Equalizing privacy and specifying equality。Revisioning the political: Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory。Boulder, CO。  new window
14.Fraser, N.(1998)。Sex, lies, and the public sphere: some reflections on the confirmation of Clarence Thomas。Feminism, the public and the private。New York。  new window
15.Gobetti, D.(1997)。Humankind as a system: private and public agency at the origins of modern liberalism。Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy。Chicago。  new window
16.Hershatter, G.(2004)。Making the visible invisible: the fate of 'the private' in revolutionary China。Going public: Feminism and the shifting boundaries of the private sphere。Urbana。  new window
17.Mackinnon, C.(1998)。Difference and dominance: on sex discrimination。Feminism and politics。New York。  new window
18.Morgan, J.(1995)。Sexual harassment and the public/ private dichotomy: equality, moralityand manners。Public and private: Feminist legal debates。New York。  new window
19.Tay, A. E.-S.,、Kamenka, E.(1983)。Public law-private law in public and private in social life。Public and private in social life。New York。  new window
20.Yeatman, A.(1997)。Feminism and power。Reconstructing political theory: Feminist perspectives。Pennsylvania。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fairclough, N.、Wodak, R.(1997)。Critical Discourse Analysis。Discourse as social interaction。London：Sage。  new window
2.黃俊傑(2005)。東亞近世儒者對「公」「私」領域分際的思考：從孟子與桃應的對話出發。公私領域新探：東亞與西方觀點之比較。台北：台大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：795（臺灣：794，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67553083
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上