The purpose of this study was to examine the communication platform between Taroko National Park Headquarters and local aboriginal from a legislative perspective in order to understand the current state of the legislation of national park headquarters in Taiwan. National Park Act, the ordinance of national park management, has often been suggested by scholars to undertake amendments in order to facilitate efficient implementation. This study was conducted between 2000 and 2009 to investigate the building of a “communication platform” between Taroko National Park Headquarters and local aboriginal. Comprehensive documentation, literature analysis and in-depth interviews were methods used to gather information. Laws (including National Park Act and other important government documents such as enforcement rules) and the Headquarters policies served as the basis for analysis of the attitude towards and execution of aboriginal affairs by the Headquarters. It is discovered that the Headquarters abided by no appropriate laws in their missions, principles or methods to handle aboriginal affairs. In this study, guidelines of the American National Park Service were used for comparisons. After over a decade, the communication platform built between Taroko National Park Headquarters and local aboriginal experienced a number of ups and downs. This paper discusses the gains and losses resulted from the legislative management as well as the foundation of trust between the two parties from various aspects including policy continuity, efficiency of resource utilization, and performances. It is suggested to actively amend and formulate aboriginal policies and at the same time set up an aboriginal affairs planning task force to conduct overall planning and devise policy implementation guidelines. It is imperative to fulfill the essence of natural conservation such as biodiversity, strengthen the bridge with international conservation organizations, and facilitate a smooth operation of national park management.