臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：影響國小教師實施資訊融入主題探究教學之個人因素量表發展
書刊名：教育行政論壇. 屏東教育大學
作者：許銘津／許瑛玿／潘靖瑛 引用關係／黃義峰／林清達 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Min-jin／Hsu, Ying-shao／Pan, Ching-ying／Huang, Yi-feng／Lin, Ching-dar
出版日期：2010
卷期：2:1
頁次：頁1-31
主題關鍵詞：資訊融入主題探究教學；國小教師；量表發展；個人因素；Integrate information technology into theme-based inquiry teaching；Elementary school teachers；Development of questionnaire；Intrinsic factors
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:18
本研究旨在發展量表以探討影響國小教師實施資訊融入主題探究教學的個人因素。正式量表含41 題，計有覺知、意願、技能、信念、評價五大向度。因素分析之總解釋變異量為52.75%。以花蓮縣208 名國小教師進行正式施測，結果顯示總體信度α值為.973，各分向度的α值介於0.85 至 0.95。研究發現教師對資訊融入主題探究教學有相當高的覺知與信念、不錯的評價和技能，惟執行意願不太高。研究亦發現學歷高、服務年資長、兼任較高行政職、服務於城市的大型學校或偏遠的小型學校的教師，相較之下，皆在實施資訊融入主題探究教學的技能、評價與實施意願上，顯著偏高。
The purpose of this research was to develop a questionnaire that measures elementary school teachers' intrinsic factors regarding to the integration of information technology into theme-based inquiry teaching. The formal questionnaire consisted of 41 items and five scales as "awareness, willingness, skill, belief, and appraisal". The explained total variance was 52.75%. Then, we conducted a formal questionnaire survey upon 208 elementary school teachers in Hualien County. The Cronbach α for the entire questionnaire was 0.973; for each scale, Cronbach α ranged from 0.85 to 0.95. Regarding to intrinsic factors that influenced elementary school teachers to integrate information technology into teaching, the surveyed teachers had pretty high awareness and belief, fairly good appraisal and skill and lower willingness using a five-level Likert scale in the questionnaire. The results of this study also revealed that some background factors, such as educational background, years of service, subject taught, administrative positions, the school size and location, may cause significant differences in the expressions of the intrinsic factors of the sample teachers.
期刊論文
1.Mumtaz, S.(2000)。Factors affecting teachers, use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature。Technology, Pedagogy and Education，9(3)，319-342。  new window
2.張雅芳、朱鎮宇、徐加玲(20070600)。國小教師資訊科技融入教學現況之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，44(4)，413-434。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ertmer, P. A.(1999)。Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration。Educational Technology Research and Development，47(4)，47-61。  new window
4.Clark, K. D.(2000)。Urban middle school teachers' use of instructional technology。Journal Research on Computing in Education，33(2)，178-195。  new window
5.Duffee, L.、Aikenhead, G. G.(1992)。Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge。Science Education，76(5)，493-506。  new window
6.Van Driel, J. H.、Beijaard, D.、Verloop, N.(2001)。Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，38(2)，137-158。  new window
7.Huang, H. M.、Liaw, S. S.(2005)。Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the Web as a survey tool。Computers in Human Behavior，21(5)，729-743。  new window
8.Anderson, R. D.(2002)。Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry。Journal of Science Teacher Education，13(1)，1-12。  new window
9.Edelson, Daniel C.(2001)。Learning-for-use: A Framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，38(3)，355-385。  new window
10.Edelson, D. C.、Gordin, D. N.、Pea, R. D.(1999)。Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design。Journal of the Learning Sciences，8(3/4)，391-450。  new window
11.Bardi, A.、Schwartz, S. H.(2003)。Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，29(10)，1207-1220。  new window
12.蕭英勵(2007)。是誰吃了乳酪？從教育夥伴談學校推展資訊融入教學之策略。中等教育，58(2)，80-101。  延伸查詢new window
13.Akbaba, S.; Kurubacak, G.(1999)。Teachers’ attitudes towards technology。Computers in the Social Studies，7(2)，833–836。  new window
14.Davis, K. S.、Falba, C. J.(2002)。Integrating technology in elementary pre-service teacher education: Orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways。Journal of science teacher education，13(4)，303-329。  new window
15.Feldman, A.(2000)。Decision-making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change。Science Education，84(5)，606-623。  new window
16.Hung, Y. W.、Hsu, Y. S.(2007)。Examining teachers’ CBT use in the classroom: A study in secondary schools in Taiwan。Educational Technology & Society，10(3)，233-246。  new window
17.Jones, M. T.、Eick, C. J.(2007)。Implementing Inquiry Kit curriculum: obstacles, adaptations, and practical knowledge development in two middle school science teachers。Science Education，91(3)，492-513。  new window
18.Kraijcik, J.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Fredricks, J.、Soloway, E.(1998)。Inquiry in Project-Based Science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students。The Journal of the Learning Sciences，7(3/4)，313-350。  new window
19.Schauble, L.、Glaser, R.、Duschl, R. A.、Schulze, S.、John, J.(1995)。Students’ understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom。The Journal of the Learning Sciences，4，131-166。  new window
20.Sung, Y. T.、Lesgold, A.(2007)。Software infrastructure for teachers: A missing link in integrating technology with instruction。Teachers College Record，109(11)，2541-2575。  new window
21.van Braak, J.(2001)。Individual characteristics influencing teachers' class use of computers。Journal of Educational Computing Research，25(2)，141-157。  new window
22.van Braak, J.、Tondeur, J.、Valcke, M.(2004)。Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers。European Journal of Psychology of Education，19(4)，407-422。  new window
23.Veen, W.(1993)。How Teachers Use Computers in Instructional Practice: four case studies in a Dutch secondary school。Computers and Education，21(1/2)，1-8。  new window
24.Verplanken, B.、Holland, R. W.(2002)。Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior。Journal of personality and social psychology，82(3)，434-447。  new window
25.Yerrick, R.、Hoving, T.(1999)。Obstacles confronting technology initiatives as seen through the experience of science teachers: a comparative study of science teachers’ beliefs, planning, and practice。Journal of Science Education and Technology，8(4)，291-307。  new window
會議論文
1.許銘津、黃義峰(2005)。國小教師應用TINS融入主題探究教學引導不同學業成就的學生學習之研究。第二十一屆科學教育學術研討會，國立彰化師範大學舉辦 。彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊永芬(2005)。國民小學教師創新接受傾向與資訊科技融入教學接受程度之相關因素研究--以台北市資訊重點學校為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪逸文(2007)。影響教師資訊融入教學因素之探討：以中學地球科學教師為例(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gay, L. R.、Airasian, P.(2003)。Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications。NY：Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
2.Cuban, L.(2001)。Oversold and underused: Computer in the classroom。Cambridge, MA：Havard University Press。  new window
3.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Moseley, D.、Higgins, S.(1999)。Ways Forward With ICT: effective pedagogy using information and communications technology for literacy and numeracy in primary schools。London：Teacher Training Agency。  new window
5.National Center for Educational Statistics(2000)。Teachers’ tools for the 21st century。U. S. Department of Education。  new window
其他
1.Moroz, P. A.，Nash, J. B.(1997)。Bath county computer attitude scale: A reliability and validity scale，http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED408319， 2007/06/02。  new window
2.Ravitz, J.，Wong, Y.，Becker, H.(1999)。Report to participants，Irvine, CA：Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations。，http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/special_report/index.htm， 2008/05/05。  new window
3.Sang, G.，Valcke, M.，Van Braak, J.，Tondeur, J.(2009)。Factors support or prevent teachers from integrating ICT into classroom teaching: A Chinese perspective，Hong Kong：Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education。  new window
4.US Department of Education(2005)。Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology program，http://www.ed.gov/programs/teachtech/index.html， 2007/10/26。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ajzen, Icek(1989)。Attitude Structure and Behavior。Attitude Structure and Function。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.Ajzen, Icek(1985)。From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior。Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior。Springer-Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1134（臺灣：1088，外國：46） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67446646
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上