Regarding the attribution issue of slips NO.18 and 22 of "Di Zi Wen" that have been widely discussed by scholars, I find that the two slips are not attributable to the "Jun Zi Wei Li". In the paper, I analyze the differences among varieties of schools, ranging from the bamboo textual words and readings to wording explanations. While the profound findings of researchers are sufficiently revealed and my personal opinions are proposed, I look forward to make more accurate interpretation for the text after this detailed verification. In addition, the "Jun Zi Wei Li" includes three main subjects: science of "Li", spread of literature and the issues of Confucianism. The former involves gestures of men, especially the details for their appearances and movements in the occasion when the courtiers are to meet with the monarch. Moreover, the other is related to the appearances of the bureaucrats in specific occasions, such as the sacrifice and court. Furthermore, the "image of Confucius" mentioned in the contents should originate from the early years of Warring era. The concept has also been passed down and deepened through long-lasting literatures. The latter expresses the inheritance and description of "Ren" (仁), "Li" (禮) and "Yi" (義) by the followers of Confucianism in Chu in the Warring Period.