臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：地方文化創意產業政策的公眾參與認知研究
書刊名：公共行政學報
作者：馬群傑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ma, Chun-chieh
出版日期：2011
卷期：40
頁次：頁1-39
主題關鍵詞：文化創意產業；公眾參與；理性；直覺；認知續線理論；Public participation；Cultural creative industry；Rational；Intuitive；Cognitive continuum theory
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:257
  • 點閱點閱:34
決策制定是公共政策研究中的重要課題之一。然而，決策制定者究竟 採行何種認知決策途徑，才能切合政策利害關係人的認知需求，國內公共 政策研究中卻較少探討。因此，本研究即聚焦於公共政策中的理性與直覺 （超理性）決策制定途徑，探討多元決策者在進行決策制定時，所執持認 知分析型態與其分歧程度。臺南市擁有國內傳統特有的古蹟文化資產，然 而，地區公私群體對於地方文化產業發展意見卻莫衷一是。為求瞭解公私 群體的認知型式與認知差異，期以釐清地方公私群體間的決策制定認知途 徑，本研究即以臺南市為研究範圍，採取理性與直覺決策制定途徑分析。 研究先針對國內地區文化產業發展現況進行分析比較，再透過認知續線理 論（Cognitive Continuum Theory, CCT）的社會準實驗，深入了解多元群 體對臺南市地方文化產業發展政策的認知取向。研究發現，首先，國內文 創產業的資源分布具有相當程度的地域落差。其次，以CCT 進行本土性文創產業政策的探究乃具備研究方法上的可行性、嚴謹性與適當性。再 者，透過準實驗的量化衡量方法檢測，研究者乃足以將地方發展群體之認 知模式與政策偏好歧異進行具體釐清與完整展現。由此，本研究方法與成 果應可提供予未來地方文創產業政策決策者，裨益其進行公眾參與認知差 異的有效解構，並達成由根本上化解因決策變數修改而引致公共決策衝突 之最終目的。
Since decision making is one of the most important topics on the research of public policy, there has been relatively little effort devoted in exploring the cognition of policy stakeholders in Taiwan. Under such circumstances, this study focuses on modes and degrees of diversity of cognition with the rational and intuitive approach while making decisions. Tainan is transforming into a livable place with traditional cultural uniqueness. However, demands of citizens in Tainan are not fully corresponded to public policies made by public sectors. In order to recognize the modes and degrees of diversity of cognition of public and private stakeholders in Tainan, the study proceeds through exploring the rational and intuitive decision-making approach. To sum up, the study describes situations of the cultural creative industry development policies in Tainan and illustrate the competitive strengths. Then we introduce and testify the Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT) in the quasi-experiment of cultural creative industry development of Tainan. Results of this study are as followed. First, there exist gaps of resources of cultural industry between cities in Taiwan. Second, studies on domestic policies of cultural creative industry with the application of CCT would be of much feasibility, conscientiousness and suitability. Third, we can figure out the models of cognitions and differences of preferences on local development policy by adopting quasi-experiment research designs. The method and results should be of benefit to decision-makers engaging in local cultural creative industry policy, so as to de-structuring the differences of cognition of public participation effectively and condensing conflicts between multiple decision-makers and achieving the goal of predicting conflicts caused by variables.
期刊論文
1.Hammond, K. R.、Hamm, R. M.、Grassia, J.、Pearson, I.(1987)。Direct Comparasion of Efficacy of Intuitive and Analytical Cognition in Expert Judgment。IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics，17(5)，753-770。  new window
2.楊開忠(2006)。文化創意產業決策關鍵詞釋義。決策要參，2，69-74。  延伸查詢new window
3.馬群傑、陳建寧、汪明生(20061200)。認知研究：高雄地方發展之公眾認知。公共行政學報. 政大，21，115-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kahneman, D.、Tversky, A.(1982)。On the Study of Statistical Intuitions。Cognition，11，123-141。  new window
5.Phelps, R. H.、Shanteau, J.(1978)。Livestock Judges How Much Information Can an Expert Use。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，121，209-211。  new window
6.辛晚教(2000)。地方文化產業與國際休閒化。文化視窗，26，12-21。  延伸查詢new window
7.Stubbs, B.、Warnaby, G.、Medway, D.(2002)。Marketing at the public-private sector interface: Town centre management schemes in the south of England。Cities，19(5)，317-326。  new window
8.Romer, Paul M.(1990)。Endogenous Technological Change。Journal of Political Economy，98(5, Part 2)，S71-S102。  new window
9.蔡文芳(2008)。當文化遇上經濟：文化經濟簡介。文化研究月報，86，68-75。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭美華(2008)。推動文化產業政策與政府治理模式的轉型。公共行政學報，27，111-159。  延伸查詢new window
11.Etzioni, A.(2000)。Toward a theory of public ritual。Sociological Theory，18，44-59。  new window
12.Van Riel, A.、Ouwersloot, H.、Lemming, J.(2006)。Antecedents of Effective Decision Making: A Cognitive Approach。The ICFAI Journal of Managerial Economics，4，7-28。  new window
會議論文
1.許焯權(2006)。新的財富之源--創意產業的作用。第二屆中國國際文化產業博覽交易會文化產業發展論壇，中國國務院文化部主辦 。深圳。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stough, R. R.(1998)。Infrastructure and Technology in U.S. Metropolitan Regions。The Workshop on Infrastructure Policy，(會議日期: February)。Amsterdam：The Tinbergen Institute。  new window
3.黃金鳳、洪致美(2003)。文化政策與第三部門。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳思華(2003)。文化創意產業的基礎機制--人才培育與文化平台。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫華翔(2003)。文化創意產業之產業定義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔣耀賢(2003)。藝術策略與區域平臺。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.盧建明(2003)。在地化與區域性文化產業。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Mulcahy, K. V.(2007)。What is cultural policy? Transformation and imagination。Kaohsiung.。  new window
圖書
1.行政院文化建設委員會(2003)。文化創意產業發展計畫宣導手冊。行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺南市政府(2006)。臺南市政府施政總報告。臺南市政府。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cliché, D.、Mitchell, R.、Wiesand, J. A.、Heiskanen, I.、dal Pozzolo, Luca(2002)。Creative Europe。Bonn：ARCult Media。  new window
4.Wiesand, A. J.(2003)。Creative Europe: on Government and Management of Artistic Creativity in Europe。ERIC arts: European Research Institute for Comparative Cultural Policy and the Arts。  new window
5.Huet, A.、Ion, J.、Lefebvre, A.、Miege, B.、Peron, R.(1978)。Capitalisme et industries Culturelles。Grenoble：Presses Universitaires de Grenoble。  new window
6.Simon, Harbert A.(1977)。The new science of management decision。Prentice Hall PTR。  new window
7.Williams, Raymond.(1981)。Culture。Glasgow：Fontana Paperbacks。  new window
8.Malhotra, N. K.、Hall, J.、Shaw, M.、Crip, M.(1996)。Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation。New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
9.行政院經濟建設委員會(2003)。挑戰2008：國家重點發展計畫。臺北：行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Blakely, E. J.(1994)。Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE Publications：J. Blakely。  new window
11.Ashworth, G. J.、Voogd, H.(1994)。Selling the City: Marketing Approaches in Public Sector Urban Planning。London：Belhaven Press。  new window
12.Brunswik, E.(1956)。Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。  new window
13.Scott, A. J.(2000)。The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-Producing Industries。SAGE Publications。  new window
14.Lash, S.、Urry, J.(1994)。Economics of Signs and Space: After Organized Capitalism。London：Sage。  new window
15.丘昌泰(2008)。公共政策：基礎篇。巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張紹勳、張紹評、劉秀娟(2000)。SPSS for Windows統計分析：初等統計與高等統計。臺北：松崗。  延伸查詢new window
17.Adorno, Theodor W.、Horkheimer, Max、Cumming, John(1979)。Dialectic of Enlightenment。London：Verso。  new window
18.Cooksey, R. W.(1996)。Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications。University of New England。  new window
19.Hammond, K. R.(1996)。Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
20.Hesmondhalgh, David(2002)。The cultural industries。SAGE Publications。  new window
21.Throsby, David(2001)。Economics and culture。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.林進田、國立編譯館(1993)。抽樣調查：理論與應用。台北市：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Mayer, Robert R.(1985)。Policy and program planning: A developmental perspective。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
24.Dunn, William N.(2008)。Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction。Prentice Hall。  new window
25.Zukin, Sharon(1995)。The Cultures of Cities。Blackwell。  new window
26.Campbell, Donald T.、Stanley, Julian C.(1966)。Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research。Rand-McNally。  new window
27.行政院文化建設委員會(2009)。2008年文化創意產業年報。臺北：行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
28.胡惠林(2006)。文化政策學。山西。  延伸查詢new window
29.Bradford, G.、Gary, M.、Wallach, G.(2000)。The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions, and communities。New York：The New Press。  new window
30.Castells, M.(2000)。The rise of networking society。Malden：Blackwell Publishers。  new window
31.Frohock, Fred M.(1979)。Public policy, scope and logic。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
32.Stevenson, D.(2000)。Art and organization: Making Australian Cultural Policy。St. Lucia：University of Queensland Press。  new window
33.Ward, S. V.(1998)。Selling places: The marketing and promotion of towns and cities。London。  new window
34.Dror, Y.(1989)。Public policymaking re-examined。New Jersey。  new window
35.Florida, R.(2002)。Cities and the creative class。New York。  new window
36.行政院文建會(2005)。2004年文化白皮書。臺北：行政院文建會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.劉大和(2002)。臺灣發展文化創意產業的思考，臺北：臺灣經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(2009)。政府統計總覽，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?x， 20091211。  延伸查詢new window
3.UNESCO the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2010)。Creative industries，http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=35024&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html， 20101019。  new window
圖書論文
1.花建(2005)。文化產業競爭力的內涵、結構和戰略重點。北大文化產業前沿報告。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李向民、王晨(2005)。精神經濟：經濟增長的新範式。北大文化產業前沿報告。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wyszomirski, M. J.(2002)。Arts and culture。The state of nonprofit America。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：323（臺灣：322，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67524323
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上