:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用Kano品質模式探討藺草材質之創新設計
書刊名:文化創意產業研究學報
作者:陳俊智蘇玟綺
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-chinSu, Wen-chi
出版日期:2012
卷期:2:4
頁次:頁383-401
主題關鍵詞:文化創意產業Kano品質模式藺草評價構造法Refined Kano品質模型Cultural and creative industryKano modelRush grassEvaluation grid methodRefined Kano model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:62
文化創意產業的興起,將設計媒合傳統工藝,結合設計師與工藝家的力量,將傳統轉化再設計,創造新風貌,是傳統產業發掘新價值之捷徑。本研究應用Kano品質模式,探討運用藺草材質於商品設計之魅力;研究藉由評價構造法之實施,蒐集消費者對於藺草材質商品之魅力屬性,並應用二維尺度概念之Kano品質模式,探討消費者情感屬性評價與滿意度之間的不同品質關係。研究歸納出消費者對於運用藺草材質之商品的評價因子,包括:精品感因子、手感因子兩個構面。同時,在Kano品質分類的結果,說明各情感屬性項目與滿意度之間確實存在不同線性與非線性之Kano品質分類之關係,藉由Kano品質概念可釐清消費者對於藺草材質之商品品質需求差異,配合Refined Kano品質模型將其以重要度高低做一劃分,歸納出消費者對於運用藺草材質商品的重要魅力因子,以作為傳統藺草編織產業擬定設計策略時之參考依據,幫助了解經營現況以及產業振興之癥結。
The rise of cultural and creative industries creates the new opportunities to introduce design into the traditional crafts. By transforming the traditional symbols and philosophy into the new creations, the designers and craftsmen collaborate to give the traditional industries a new look and value-added. The purpose of this is to explore the attractive attributes of the product design using the traditional material, rush grass. Firstly, using evaluation grid method to collect attractive attributes of the material rush grass for consumers. The two-dimensional Kano model is used to explore the relationships between quality attribute performance and consumer preference. The factor analysis then was used to explore the users' perceptions on new designs using the material rush grass. Two factors, boutique factor and hand-made factor, were extracted. Then the Kano's regression method was conducted. The 9 attractive emotional attributes were categorized as different Kano's classifications, including must-be quality, one-dimensional quality and indifferent quality. This implies that linear and non-linear relationships between emotion attributes performance and consumer preference of new designs using the material rush grass do exist. Based on the result of Kano classification and the weight rating of the emotional attributes, the Refined Kano model was conducted to extract the critical and attractive attributes. The outcome can help designers and traditional industries on planning design strategy.
期刊論文
1.Pine II, B. J.、Gilmore, J. H.(1998)。Welcome to the Experience Economy。Harvard Business Review,76(4),97-105。  new window
2.林榮泰(20091200)。文化創意產品設計:從感性科技、人性設計與文化創意談起。人文與社會科學簡訊,11(1),32-42。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳國蕙(20110600)。藺草編織造型創作研究。美容科技學刊,8(2),133-144。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yang, C. C.(2005)。The Refined Kano’s Model and Its Applications。Total Quality Management,62(10),1127-1137。  new window
5.Chen, C.C.、Chuan, M.C.(2011)。A Design Decision-Making Support Model for Prioritizing Affective Qualities of Product。Lecture Note on Computer Science,6677,21-30。  new window
6.Llinares, Carmen、Page, Alvaro F.(2011)。Kano's model in Kansei Engineering to evaluate subjective real estate consumer preferences。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,41(3),233-246。  new window
7.Ujigawa, M.(2000)。The evolution of preference-based design。Research and Development Institute,46,1-10。  new window
8.Mittal, Vikas、Ross, William T. Jr.、Baldasare, Patrick M.(1998)。The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions。Journal of Marketing,62(1),33-47。  new window
9.鄭夙恩、陸佳暉(20090100)。從傳統工藝過渡到文化創意產業的可能性--以苑裡藺編工藝發展軌跡為例。美學藝術學,3,97-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳俊智、李依潔(20081200)。應用Kano品質模式探討文化產品設計之魅力因子。設計學報,13(4),25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kano, N.、Seraku, N.、Takahashi, F.、Tsuji, S.(1984)。Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality。Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control,14(2),39-48。  new window
12.Ting S. C.、Chen C. N.(2002)。The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction。Total Quality Management,13(4),547-569。  new window
會議論文
1.Sanui, Junichiro(1996)。Visualization of users' requirements: Introduction of the Evaluation Grid Method。The 3rd Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture & Urban Planning Conference,365-374。  new window
2.曾麗丹(2007)。台灣地方文化創意產業魅力評價─以宜蘭童玩節為例。台灣高雄。268。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kelly, George A.(1955)。The Psychology of personal constructs。W. W. Norton。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE