:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區貧窮女性化現象之探討:以1990年代為例
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:薛承泰 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsueh, Cherng-tay
出版日期:2004
卷期:29
頁次:頁95-121
主題關鍵詞:單親戶貧窮貧窮比貧窮女性化Feminization of povertyOne-parent familiesPovertyPoverty ratio
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:92
本研究採用主計處「家庭收支調查」1991-2000 年資料,探討台灣地區「貧窮女性化」的現象及其特性。研究發現,貧戶中女性戶長家戶比例十年間大致呈現上升,且女性戶長家戶貧窮率每年也都比男性戶長家戶為高;但經由「貧窮比」分析,發現貧窮性別差異十年間頗為穩定。因此,可以說台灣地區「貧窮女性化」現象,只能算是方興未艾!在比較不同家戶組成的分析中,發現「單親戶」貧窮率不是最高的,其趨勢不僅沒有增加反而在1993 年之後有好轉的現象;值得注 意的是,「有依賴子女」的女性戶長家戶具有穩定偏高的貧窮率,可是性別貧窮比也未呈現任何上升的趨勢。最後,根據多變項分析結果,在戶長年齡、戶長教育、依賴子女數等變項的控制下,女性戶長家戶相對於男性戶長家戶具有較高的機會落入貧窮,而「是否為單親」對貧窮的影響則不顯著,這種情形在「有依賴子女」的家戶當中,更為明顯。可以說,「成為單親」並非是台灣女性戶長家戶落入貧窮的主因,而是「有依賴子女」才具有更穩定的解釋力。
The phenomenon of feminization of poverty has been widely discussed in US, mainly due to the increasing proportion of poor who were females, during 1960-1980. Along with the trend of urbanization and modernization, since 1990, Taiwan has begun to experience the increase in divorce rates and concomitantly the increase in number of one-parent families. Using data from the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure (SFIE), 1991-2000 waves, conducted by DGBAS annually, the author intended to examine the hypothesis of feminization of poverty in terms of changes in proportion of poverty rate as well as poverty ratio. Instead of using individuals as analytical units, the author focused on comparing various types of household units and found the trend of increasing proportion of female headed households that were poor. However, no tangible trends were found either between families of male and female householders or among different family types, when poverty ratios were used for testing the feminization hypothesis. When the traits of householders were under controlled, unlike those found in the US and some Western countries, mother-only families in Taiwan were not significantly related to the likelihood of poverty, but the number of cohabiting children had positive effects on being poverty of households during 1990s.
期刊論文
1.Pearce, Diane(1978)。The Feminization of Poverty: Women, Work and Welfare。Urban and Social Change Review,11(1/2),28-36。  new window
2.Bianchi, Suzanne M.(1999)。Feminization and Juvenilization of Poverty: Trends, Relative Risks, Causes, and Consequences。Annual Review of Sociology,25,307-333。  new window
3.呂朝賢(19960900)。貧窮女性化與貧窮程度的性別差異。人文及社會科學集刊,8(2),221-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林美伶、王德睦(200009)。貧窮門檻對貧窮率與貧窮人口組成之影響。臺灣社會福利學刊,1,93-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Teachman, J. D.、Tedrow, L. M.、Crowder, K. D.(2000)。The Changing Demography of America's Families。Journal of Marriage and the Family,62,1234-1246。  new window
6.薛承泰、王嘉寧(20010600)。臺灣「頂客族」的形成與特質。人口學刊,22,19-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.薛承泰(20020600)。臺灣地區單親戶的變遷:1990年與2000年普查的比較。臺大社會工作學刊,6,1+3-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.何華欽、王德睦、呂朝賢(20031200)。貧窮測量對貧窮人口組成之影響:預算標準之訂定與模擬。人口學刊,27,67-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.謝美娥(19981000)。臺灣女性單親家庭的類型、「人力」資源與居住安排之初探。國立政治大學社會學報,28,117-152。  延伸查詢new window
10.薛承泰(20021200)。一九九O年代臺灣地區單人戶的特性--兼論老人單人戶之貧窮。人口學刊,25,57-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.薛承泰(19960400)。臺灣地區單親戶的數量、分佈與特性:以1990年普查為例。人口學刊,17,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade(1994)。Women's Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies。Population and Development Review,20(2),293-342。  new window
13.Eggebeen, D. J.、Wendy, D. M.(1996)。Children in Single-Father Families in Demographic Perspective。Journal of Family Issues,17(4),441-465。  new window
14.Lichter, D. T.、Lichter, Daniel T.(1997)。Poverty and Inequality among Children。Annual Review of Sociology,23,121-145。  new window
15.McLanahan, S. S.、Sorensen, A.、Waston, D.(1989)。Sex Differences in Poverty, 1950-1980。Journal of Women in Culture Society,15(1),102-122。  new window
16.Peterson, J.(1987)。The Feminization of Poverty。Journal of Economic Issues,21(1),329-337。  new window
17.Pressman, S.(1989)。Comment on Peterson's Feminization of Poverty。Journal of Economic Issues,23(1),231-245。  new window
研究報告
1.Bradshaw, J.、Ditch, J.、Holmes, H.、Whiteford, P.(1993)。Support for Children: a Comparison of Arrangements in Fifteen Countries。London, UK。  new window
學位論文
1.黃乃凡(1995)。台灣貧窮女性化的探討:女性戶長家戶貧窮現象之貫時性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Garfinkel, I.、McLanahan, S. S.(1986)。Single Mothers and Their Children。Washington, D. C.:Urban Institute Press。  new window
2.Aldrich, John H.、Nelson, Forrest D.(1984)。Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models。Sage Publications。  new window
3.Duncan, G. J.、Gustafsson, B.、Hauser, R.、Schmaus, G.、Jenkins, S.、Messinger, H.、Muffels, R.、Nolan, B.、Ray, J.、Voges, W.(1995)。Poverty and Social-Assistance Dynamics in the Unit ed States, Canada, and Europe。Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy: Western States in the New World Order。New York, NY。  new window
4.(1990)。The Feminization of Poverty: Only in America?。The Feminization of Poverty: Only in America?。New York, NY。  new window
5.Scott, H.(1984)。Working Your Way to the Bottom: the Feminization of Poverty。Working Your Way to the Bottom: the Feminization of Poverty。Boston, MA。  new window
6.Townsend, P.(1974)。Poverty as Relative Deprivation: Resources and Style of Living。Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure。London, UK。  new window
7.U.S. Census Bureau(1983)。Current Population Survey。Current Population Survey。Washington, DC。  new window
8.U.S. Census Bureau(2000)。Current Population Survey。Current Population Survey。Washington, DC。  new window
9.U.S. Census Bureau(2001)。Poverty in the United States: 2000。Poverty in the United States: 2000。沒有紀錄。  new window
10.U.S. Census Bureau(2003)。Poverty in the United States: 2002。Poverty in the United States: 2002。沒有紀錄。  new window
其他
1.(2002)。中華民國社會指標統計,臺北市:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2001)。中華民國臺灣地區八十九年家庭收支調查報告,臺北市:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Pearce, D.(1990)。Welfare Is Not for Wowen: Why the War on Poverty Cannot Conquer the Feminization of Poverty。Women, the State, and Welfare。Madison, WI:The University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE