臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書代數教材之比較
書刊名：教科書研究
作者：徐偉民 引用關係／曾于珏
作者(外文)：Hsu, Wei-min／Tseng, Yu-jiue
出版日期：2013
卷期：6:2
頁次：頁69-103
主題關鍵詞：內容分析法；代數；國小數學教科書；數學問題；Content analysis；Algebra；Elementary mathematics textbook；Mathematics problem
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:35
本研究設計一種分析教科書內容與目標關聯性的方法，以盲測法（blind test）方式，請專家小組依據教科書圖文內容或教學活動設計等，採取統觀詮釋取向，進行文本轉化，判斷敘寫單元教學目標及勾選分段能力指標。所得目標資料，再由另一專家小組，對照教科書原訂目標資料，進行語意關聯的評定或統計，獲得關聯圖形及數據，以輔助瞭解教科書內容與目標的關聯情形，以及發覺值得進一步討論探究的焦點。依據方法設計本身的特點、應備條件，以及實徵試用的歷程與結果進行檢討，此分析方法的效用性、客觀性、簡明性等均可獲得肯定。至於時間與財政層面的可行性，則需要教科書審查評鑑權責機構協調配合，以期獲得提升。
This study designed a correlation analysis method that focused on textbook content and objectives. Based on a mechanism similar to blind test, this method used a team of experts to survey texts, pictures, charts, and instruction activities employing a comprehensive and interpretative approach, converting textbook content into instruction objectives and competence indicators. Another team of experts further compared the instruction objectives and competence indicators with the original instruction objectives and competence indicators listed in the textbooks. Using the graphics and data, the semantic association of the two sets of instruction objectives and the statistic correlation of the two sets of competence indicators are presented for further discussion and examination. The applicability of this analysis method was inspected in accordance with features particular to this research method and requisites that are to be met in method design, and the processes and results of empirical trial. The utility, objectivity and conciseness of this analysis method could be verified. However, some coordination with textbook accreditation and evaluation authorities were required to enhance the feasibility in terms of time and finance.
期刊論文
1.Gutstein, E.(2003)。Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，34(1)，37-73。  new window
2.Henningsen, M.、Stein, M. K.(1997)。Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroombased factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，28(5)，524-549。  new window
3.Silver, E. A.、Mesa, V. M.、Morris, K. A.、Star, J. R.、Benken, B. M.(2009)。Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification。American Educational Research Journal，46(2)，501-531。  new window
4.徐偉民、黃皇元(20120700)。臺灣與芬蘭國小數學教科書分數教材內容之分析。課程與教學，15(3)，75-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.徐偉民、董修齊(2012)。臺灣與芬蘭國小數學幾何教材內容之分析。當代教育研究季刊，20(3)，39-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.D'Ambrosio, Ubiratan(1985)。Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics。For the Learning of Mathematics，5(1)，44-48。  new window
7.Raymond, A. M.、Leinenbach, M.(2000)。Collaborative Action Research on the Learning and Teaching of Algebra: A Story of One Mathematics Teacher's Development。Educational Studies in Mathematics，41(3)，283-307。  new window
8.Zhu, Y.、Fan, L. H.(2006)。Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，4(4)，609-626。  new window
9.Lloyd, G. M.(2008)。Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher's appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，39(1)，63-94。  new window
10.吳麗玲、楊德清(20070300)。臺灣、新加坡與美國五、六年級分數教材佈題呈現與知識屬性差異之研究。國立編譯館館刊，35(1)，27-40。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐偉民(20130300)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊，21(1)，25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Star, J. R., Betha, H. E.,、Smith, J. P.(2000)。Algebraic concepts: What’s really new in new curricula。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School，5(7)，446-451。  new window
13.Herscovics, N.、Linchevski, L.(1994)。A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra。Educational Studies in Mathematics，27(1)，59-78。  new window
14.Charalambous, C. Y.、Delaney, S.、Hsu, H. Y.、Mesa, V.(2010)。A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries。Mathematical Thinking and Learning，12(2)，117-151。  new window
15.徐偉民(20110400)。數學課程實施--一位國小資深教師的個案研究。科學教育學刊，19(2)，101-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.徐偉民、徐于婷(20091200)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析：臺灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，67-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Nicol, C. C.、Crespo, S. M.(2006)。Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials。Educational Studies in Mathematics，62，331-355。  new window
18.林碧珍、蔡文煥(20030500)。四年級學生在國際教育成就調查試測的數學成就表現。科學教育，258，2-20。  延伸查詢new window
19.徐偉民(20110600)。三位六年級教師數學課程實施之比較。教育研究集刊，57(2)，85-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Remillard, J. T.(2005)。Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula。Review of Educational Research，75(2)，211-246。  new window
21.楊德清、施怡真、徐偉民、尤欣涵(20110400)。臺灣、美國和新加坡小一數學教材內容之比較研究。課程與教學，14(2)，103-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳仁輝、楊德清(20100200)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊，18(1)，43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Smith, J. P.、Phillips, E. A.(2000)。Listening to middle school students’ algebraic thinking。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School，6(3)，56-61。  new window
24.Son, J. W.、Senk, S. L.(2010)。How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions。Educational Studies in Mathematics，74(2)，117-142。  new window
會議論文
1.Törnroos, J.(2004)。Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and achievement。The ICME-10 Discussion Group 14。Copenhagen。  new window
學位論文
1.徐曉慧(2010)。台灣與中國小學數學教科書代數教材內容分析之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張琇涵(2006)。臺灣與新加坡三角函數課程之教科書比較(碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lesh, R.、Lamon, S. J.(1992)。Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics。Washington, DC：American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
2.陳之華(2010)。成就每一個孩子：從芬蘭到臺北，陳之華的教育觀察筆記。天下雜誌股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Saarelainen, P.(2010)。Laskutaito 6A in English。Helsinki, Finland：WSOY。  new window
4.楊瑞智(2009)。國民小學數學(第六版，第十二冊，六下)。臺北縣：康軒。  延伸查詢new window
5.Barton, B.(2009)。The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales。Springer。  new window
6.Fong, H. K.、Gan, K. S.、Ramakrishnan, C.(2010)。My Pals are Here! Maths 6A。Singapore：Marshall Cavendish Education。  new window
7.Leonard, J.、Dantley, S. J.(2005)。Breaking through the ice: Dealing with issues of diversity in mathematics and science education course。Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy。Mahwah, NJ：Laurence Erlbaum。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2001)。Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA。Paris, France：Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
9.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2002)。Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003。Paris, France：Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
10.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2003)。Education at the glance。Paris, France：Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
11.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2012)。PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do。Paris, Frence：OECD。  new window
12.教育部(2003)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要--數學學習領域。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
13.Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006)。Mathematics syllabus primary。Ministry of Education。  new window
14.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Foy, P.、Olson, J. F.、Preuschoff, C.、Erberber, E.、Arora, A.、Galia, J.(2008)。TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades。Chestnut Hill, MA：TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
15.王文科(2002)。教育研究法--教育研究的理論與實際。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
16.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
17.Stein, M. K.、Smith, M. S.、Henningsen, M. A.、Silver, E. A.(2000)。Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
18.Artzt, A. F.、Armour-Thomas, E.(2002)。Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: A guide for observations and self-assessment。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
19.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
20.Chambliss, M. J.、Calfee, R. C.(1999)。Textbooks for learning。London, England：Blackwell。  new window
21.Bishop, A. J.、Forgasz, H. J.(2007)。Issues in Access and Equity in Mathematics Education。Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning。Gweenwich, CT：Information Age。  new window
22.Pimm, D.(1995)。Symbols and Meanings in School Mathematics。Symbols and Meanings in School Mathematics。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.(2007)。康軒數學教育理念，http://www.knsh.com.tw/。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2011)。關於康軒經營成果，http://www.knsh.com.tw/about/about.asp?go_Sub_Topic=08。  new window
3.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。PISA 2006 results: PISA 2006 science competencies fortomorrow’s world executive summary，http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.html。  new window
4.National Board of Education(2004)。National core curriculum for basic education 2004，http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricula， 2010/02/14。  new window
圖書論文
1.Perkins, D. N.(1998)。What is understanding?。Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.National Research Council(2004)。Framework for evaluating curricular effectiveness。On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations。Washington, DC：National Academies Press。  new window
3.Floden, R. E.(2002)。The measurement of opportunity to learn。Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement。Washington：National Academy Press。  new window
4.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.、Smith, M. S.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Information Age。  new window
5.Anderson, C. W.(2003)。How can schools support teaching for understanding in mathematics and science?。Transforming: how schools and districts can support change。NY：Teacher College。  new window
6.Ensign, J.(2005)。Helping teachers use students' home cultures in mathematics lessons: Developmental stages of becoming effective teachers of diverse students。Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
7.Kieran, C.(1992)。The Learning and Teaching of School Algebra。Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
8.Lesh, R.、Post, T.、Behr, M.(1987)。Representation and translation among representation in mathematics learning and problem solving。Problem of presentation in teaching and learning of mathematics。Hillsdale, NJ：Laurence Erlbaum。  new window
9.歐用生(2000)。內容分析法。教育研究法。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.Grouws, D. A.、Smith, M. S.、Sztajn, P.(2004)。The preparation and teaching practice of U. S. Mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8。The 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Results and interpretations。Reston, VA：NCTM。  new window
11.Gu, L.、Marton, F.、Huang, R.(2004)。Teaching with Variation: An effective way of mathematics teaching in China。How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders。World Scientific。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：695（臺灣：691，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67566012
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上