臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺北都會區居住模式之研究(1980~2010)：隔離、分殊、群聚或階層？
書刊名：都市與計劃
作者：王佳煌 引用關係／李俊豪 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Chia-huang／Li, Chun-hao
出版日期：2013
卷期：40:4
頁次：頁325-354
主題關鍵詞：社居隔離；社會極化；空間同化；地方階層化；全球城市；世界城市；門禁社區；族裔飛地；Residential segregation；Social polarization；Spatial assimilation；Place stratification；Global city；World city；Gated community；Ethnic enclave
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:276
  • 點閱點閱:153
本文檢視西方居住隔離的理論、模型與觀點，分析次級資料，研究臺北都會區的居住模式，驗證各種理論與觀點的描述力與解釋力。我們假設臺北都會區的居住模式可以群聚化、分殊化與階層化稱之。資料顯示：高等教育程度的居民群聚於市中心地區、南北兩端部分地區，以及新北市直接毗連臺北市的部分區域。非高等教育程度居民集中在臺北市東西兩側，東西兩側是非高等教育程度、低收入戶比例與原住民較為集中的地區，也是房價比市中心低的地區。臺北都會區的職業有專業化趨勢，產業結構則以服務業為主。原住民、外籍勞工、大陸配偶與外籍配偶等新移民，則多半集中在臺北市的邊陲地區、新北市的原鄉與工業區集中的地區。我們認為，社會極化論、社會同化論、地方階層化、族裔社區與門禁社區研究，均難以適切地描述、解釋臺北都會區的居住模式。鑲嵌城市的觀點則比較適合臺北都會區居住模式的研究，但我們的研究有其限制，居住模式與居住隔離的議題需要更多具體資料與學者的研究，才能確認鑲嵌城市觀點的描述解釋力。
This paper examines the theories and models of residential segregation based on the Western urban development experience, and explores residential patterns in the Taipei metropolitan region. This study assumes that the residential patterns of the Taipei metropolitan region are characterized by clustering, differentiation, and stratification, which is supported by the secondary data that is collected. Residents with higher education attainment have been clustering in central Taipei City, and in some highly urbanized areas of New Taipei City. In contrast, residents without higher education, aborigines, and immigrant brides have been clustering in areas with lower housing prices or in peripheral corners of the metropolitan region. Thus, this investigation argues that most Western theories and models are inadequate to describe and explain residential patterns in the Taipei metropolitan region. The perspective of nested city and contextual research is more appropriate in helping to explore the complex mechanism and process that contributes to the residential patterns of the Taipei metropolitan region in particular and other East Asian cities in general.
期刊論文
1.陳明吉、蔡怡純、張金鶚(20031200)。住宅負擔能力惡化之再檢視--臺北市住宅市場分析。臺大管理論叢，14(1)，47-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Atkinson, R.、Flint, J.(2004)。Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation。Housing Studies，19(6)，875-892。  new window
3.Baum, S.(1997)。Sydney, Australia: A global city? Testing the social polarization thesis。Urban Studies，34(11)，1881-1901。  new window
4.Baum, S.(1999)。Social transformations in the global city: Singapore。Urban Studies，36(7)，1095-1117。  new window
5.Chang, C. O.、Chen, S. M.、Somerville, T.(2003)。Economic and social status in household decision-making: Evidence relating to extended family mobility。Urban Studies，40(4)，733-746。  new window
6.Charles, C. Z.(2003)。The dynamics of racial residential segregation。Annual Review of Sociology，29，167-207。  new window
7.Chiu, S. W. K.、Lui, T.(2004)。Testing the global city: Social polarization thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s。Urban Studies，41(10)，1863-1888。  new window
8.Cox, R.、Watt, P.(2002)。Globalization, polarization and the informal sector: The case of paid domestic workers in London。Area，34(1)，39-47。  new window
9.Cséfalvay, Z.、Webster, C.(2012)。Gates or no gates? A cross-European enquiry into the driving forces behind gated communities。Regional Studies，46(3)，293-308。  new window
10.Darden, J. T.、Kamel, S. M.(2000)。Black residential segregation in the city and suburbs of Detroit: Does socioeconomic status matter。Journal of Urban Affairs，22(1)，1-13。  new window
11.Galster, G. C.、Keeney, W. M.(1988)。Race residence, discrimination, and economic opportunity: Modeling the nexus of urban racial phenomena。Urban Affairs Quarterly，24(1)，87-117。  new window
12.Hamnett, C.(1994)。Social polarization in global cities: Theory and evidence。Urban Studies，31(3)，401-424。  new window
13.Hill, R. C.(2004)。Cities and nested hierarchies。International Social Science Journal，56(181)，373-384。  new window
14.Hill, R. C.、Fujita, K.(2003)。The nested city: Introduction。Urban Studies，40(2)，207-217。  new window
15.Hsu, C. I.、Guo, S. P.(2006)。CBD 43. oriented commuters’ mode and residential location choices in an urban area with surface streets and rail transit lines。Journal of Urban Planning and Development，132(4)，235-246。  new window
16.Iceland, J.、Scopilliti, M.(2008)。Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990-2000。Demography，45(1)，79-94。  new window
17.Koll-Schretzenmayr, M.、Ritterhoff, F.、Siebel, W.(2005)。How global is the world city hypothesis?。disP-The Planning Review，41(163)，50-73。  new window
18.La Grange, A.、Chang, C. O.、Yip, N. M.(2006)。Commodification and urban development: A case study of Taiwan。Housing Studies，21(1)，53-76。  new window
19.Lee, K. M.、Hung, W.、Law, K.(2007)。Social polarization and poverty in the global city: The cases of Hong Kong。China Report，43(1)，1-30。  new window
20.Lemanski, C.(2007)。Global cities in the South: Deepening social and spatial polarisation in Cape Town。Cities，24(6)，448-461。  new window
21.Li, W. D. H.(2006)。Privatising social sousing in Taiwan。International Journal of Social Welfare，16(1)，12-17。  new window
22.Maloutas, T.(2007)。Segregation, social polarization and immigration in Athens during the 1990s: Theoretical expectations and contextual difference。International Journal of Urban & Regional Research，31(4)，733-758。  new window
23.May, J.、Wills, J.、Datta, K.、Evans, Y.、Herbert, J.、McIlwaine, C.(2007)。Keeping London working: Global cities, the British state and London’s new migrant division of labour。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers，32(2)，151-167。  new window
24.Nørgaard, H.(2003)。The global city thesis: Social polarization and changes in the distribution of wages。Geogratiska Annaler B，85(2)，103-119。  new window
25.Polanska, D.(2010)。The emergence of gated communities in Post-Communist urban context: And the reasons for their increasing popularity。Journal of Housing and the Built Environment，25(3)，295-312。  new window
26.Rhein, C.(1998)。Globalisation, social change and minorities in Metropolitan 57. Paris: The emergence of new class patterns。Urban Studies，35(3)，429-477。  new window
27.Tai, P. F.(2006)。Social polarisation: Comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei。Urban Studies，43(10)，1737-1756。  new window
28.Tai, P. F.(2010)。Beyond "social polarization" ? A test for Asian world cities in developmental states。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，34(4)，743-761。  new window
29.Tanulku, B.(2012)。Gated communities: From "self-sufficient owns" to "active urban agents。Geoforum，43(3)，518-528。  new window
30.Vesselinov, E(2012)。Segregation by design: Mechanisms of selection of Latinos and Whites into gated communities。Urban Affairs Review，48(3)，417-454。  new window
31.Vesselinov, E.(2012)。Members only: Gated communities and residential segregation in the metropolitan United States。Sociological Forum，23(3)，536-555。  new window
32.Wessel, T.(2000)。Social polarisation and socioeconomic segregation in a welfare state: The case of Oslo。Urban Studies，37(11)，1947-1967。  new window
33.Woodward, R.(1995)。Approaches towards the study of social polarization。Progress in Human Geography，19(1)，75-89。  new window
34.紀玉臨、周孟嫻、謝雨生(20090600)。臺灣外籍新娘之空間分析。人口學刊，38，67-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Wang, C. H.(2003)。Taipei as a global city: A theoretical and empirical examination。Urban Studies，40(2)，309-334。  new window
36.Walks, R. A.(2001)。The social ecology of the post-Fordist/global city? Economic restructuring and socio-spatial polarization in the Toronto urban region。Urban Studies，38(3)，407-448。  new window
37.張金鶚、高國峰、林秋瑾(20010200)。臺北市合理房價--需求面分析。住宅學報，10(1)，51-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.蕭新煌、劉華真(19930900)。臺灣的土地住宅問題與無住屋者運動的限制。香港社會科學學報，2，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Friedmann, J.、Wolff, G.(1982)。World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，6(3)，309-344。  new window
40.許坤榮(19880700)。臺北邊緣地區住宅市場之社會學分析。臺灣社會研究，1(2/3)，149-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Friedmann, John(1986)。The World City Hypothesis。Development and Change，17(1)，69-83。  new window
42.陳小紅(19930300)。臺北市住宅區位階層化相關因素研究之初探。國立政治大學學報，66(下冊)，157-231。  延伸查詢new window
43.陳小紅(19920900)。臺北市住宅區位階層化相關因素研究之初探。國立政治大學學報，65，163-223。  延伸查詢new window
44.Hill, Richard Child、Kim, June Woo(2000)。Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul。Urban Studies，37(12)，2167-2195。  new window
45.米復國(19880700)。臺灣的公共住宅政策。臺灣社會研究季刊，1(2/3)，97-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.章英華、林季平(2008)。臺北縣原住民族就業及生活狀況調查報告。臺北：臺北縣政府原住民族行政局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院原住民族委員會(2010)。99年原住民經濟狀況調查。台北：行政院原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國住宅學會(2000)。修訂臺北縣綜合發展計畫。臺北：中華民國住宅學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所(1993)。臺北縣綜合發展計畫。臺北縣：臺北縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝高橋(1995)。臺灣大都市原住民的居住隔離：以臺北市為例。中西都會區之發展與面臨的問題。臺北市：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.Burgess, E. W.(1984)。The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project。The City。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Huang, Y.(2005)。From work-unit compounds to gated communities。Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Low, S.(2003)。Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress。New York：America, Routledge。  new window
8.Pow, C. P.(2009)。Gated Communities in China: Class, Privilege and the Moral Politics of Good Life。London：Routledge。  new window
9.Tai, P. F.(2005)。Social polarization and income inequality: Migration and urban labour markets。Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development。New York：Routledge。  new window
10.Blakely E. J.、Snyder M. G.(1997)。Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
11.王佳煌(2010)。雁行千里--東亞發展型國家的金融改革。臺北：巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Saunders, P.(1981)。Social Theory and the Urban Question。New York：London：Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.：Unwin Hyman。  new window
13.章英華(1993)。臺灣都市的內部結構：社會生態的與歷史的探討。臺北：巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Sassen, Saskia(2001)。The global city: New York, London, Tokyo。Princeton University Press。  new window
15.陳東升(19950000)。金權城市：地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部營建署，財團法人國土規劃及不動產資訊中心(2012)。住宅需求動向調查，http://pip.moi.gov.tw/Upload/sys/CONFIDENCE_SCORE/paper/101Q3_paper.pdf， 20130302。  延伸查詢new window
2.新北市政府主計處(2011)。新北市原住民人口及經濟概況，http://www.bas.ntpc.gov.tw/_file/1528/SG/42613/D.html， 20130303。  延伸查詢new window
3.新北市政府主計處(2011)。新北市原住民教育分析，http://www.bas.ntpc.gov.tw/_file/1528/SG/21862/43788.html， 20130303。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府(2011)。臺北市統計摘要，http://w2.dbas.taipei.gov.tw/NEWS_WEEKLY/summary/HPDF/100C.PDF， 20130303。  new window
5.臺北市政府原住民族事務委員會(2006)。原住民族家庭訪視結果分析報告，http://w2.native.tcg.gov.tw/9501.pdf， 20120424。  延伸查詢new window
6.臺北縣政府主計處(2010)。臺北縣外籍勞工概況，http://www.bas.ntpc.gov.tw/web66/_file/1528/upload/spe/99/990502.doc， 20130303。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳小紅(1995)。都市住宅區位分化及其成因之探討：以臺北市為例。中西都會區之發展與面臨的問題。臺北市：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：786（臺灣：745，外國：41） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67126359
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上