本文回顧《思與言》五十年來所刊登的法學論文，指出《思與言》雖然是提倡科際整合研究的學術期刊，但是前四十年所刊載的法學論文仍以作為法釋義學的部門法學為主，近十年來則出現法學多元化的趨勢，這與《思與言》的專題化發展有關，也反映臺灣法學的當代發展趨勢之一。此外，呼應《思與言》的近來發展，本文借助德國法學對於法學與法釋義學性質的研究，檢討作為臺灣法學典範的法釋義學與其侷限，主張無論是為了克服臺灣法學目前的困境，還是為了要協助作為法釋義學的法學完成其任務，臺灣法學都應朝向多元化與科際整合研究的方向發展，在這個過程中，《思與言》對待法學論文的取向，應持續目前的走向，繼續朝專題化與多元化的方向發展。

This paper retrospectively studies academic articles that have been published on the journal, ”Thought and Words” in the past fifty years. It identifies that, although ”Thought and Words” advocates interdisciplinary studies, this journal more focused on doctrinal studies of law in the first forty years. But ”Thought and Words” has switched gears and accepted diversified articles of legal studies during the last ten years. This phenomenon is related to the fact that ”Thought and Words” has adopted the special session as its focal point and reflects Taiwan's contemporary development of jurisprudence. In parallel with this phenomenon this paper also reviews the idea of doctrinal studies of law as the paradigm of jurisprudence in Taiwanand its limitation from the perspective of works that investigate the nature of jurisprudence and doctrinal studies of law in Germany. This paper argues that legal studies in Taiwan should head for multiple developments and interdisciplinary studies on law. The attitude toward articles that ”Thought and Words” should adopt is to keep its current policyto strengthen the jurisprudential diversity and interdisciplinary studies on law.