:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數學教師教科書使用之個案分析:以多面體單元教學活動調整為例
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:張淑怡 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Shu-i
出版日期:2014
卷期:22:2
頁次:頁133-175
主題關鍵詞:教科書使用幾何數學教學GeometryMathematics instructionTextbook use
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:45
本研究目的在於探究個案教師課堂上對教科書多面體單元之教學活動調整類型,及影響調整之因素。以一位任教二十多年且有長期教科書編寫經驗的國小教師為對象,透過教學觀察、深度晤談與焦點座談以蒐集資料。結果發現,個案教師對教科書多面體單元之活動與佈題的調整類型包括:新增、取代、省略,以及重組等四類。影響調整之因素主要源自下述三個層面:(一)教科書的表徵,包括具體物表徵、任務表徵、概念表徵。(二)教師的個人知識與習慣,包括數學知識、學生學習數學之知識、數學教學知識、個人習慣與觀點。(三)情境脈絡,包括時間、教具數量、專家支持。最後,針對教科書設計、師資培育,及未來研究方向三方面做出建議。
The purpose of this study is to explore how a teacher adapts the textbook activity on polyhedron and what factors affect the adaptation. The data of this study was collected from a primary school teacher, also an experienced textbook editor, who has been teaching for twenty years; the method used includes classroom observation, in-depth interview, and focus group discussion. The teacher uses four types of textbook adaptation for activities and questions when she teaches students about polyhedron: addition, replacement, omission, and reorganization. Three factors may affect the adaptation. The first one is the representation of the textbook, which includes the physical objects, tasks, and concepts. The second factor is teacher's personal knowledge and habit which includes mathematics knowledge, knowledge of students' mathematical learning, mathematics pedagogical content knowledge, and personal habit and perspective. The last one is the context which includes time, quantity of teaching aids, and support from the experts. Last but not the least, this study makes suggestions on the design of the textbook, teacher training and important aspects of further study.
期刊論文
1.甯自強(2000)。數學學習領域之編輯架構。高昇文教資訊,2,47-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ball, D. L.、Feiman-Nemser, S.(1988)。Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators。Curriculum Inquiry,18,401-423。  new window
3.Chater, N.、Lyou, K.、Myers, T.(1990)。Why are conjunctive categories overextended?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,16,497-508。  new window
4.Remillard, J. T.、Bryans, M. B.(2004)。Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,35,352-388。  new window
5.Sherin, M. G.、Drake, C.(2009)。Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Studies,41(4),467-500。  new window
6.Freeman, D. J.、Porter, A. C.(1989)。Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools?。American Educational Research Journal,26,403-421。  new window
7.Edelson, D. C.(2002)。Design Research: What we learn when we engage in design。Journal of the Learning Sciences,11(1),105-121。  new window
8.Remillard, J. T.(2005)。Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula。Review of Educational Research,75(2),211-246。  new window
9.簡紅珠(20070600)。教師專業發展與教學改善:借鏡日本小學教師的學課研究。教育研究,158,130-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.甯自強(1998)。透過課程發展人員問的形成共識增大兒童的學習機會:下一步。國立嘉義師範學院八十六學年度數學教育研討會。嘉義縣:國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.洪萬生(2003)。青少年的數學概念學習研究--子計畫五:青少年的立體幾何概念發展研究 (計畫編號:NSC91-2522-S-003-001)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.翰林出版事業(2010)。國民小學數學五上。臺南市:翰林。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brown, M.、Edelson, D. C.(2003)。Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice?。Evanston, IL:The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools。  new window
3.教育部(2003)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要--數學學習領域。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Maturana, Humberto R.、Varela, Francisco J.(1987)。The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding。Boston, Massachusetts:Shambhala。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.、Smith, M. S.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Information Age。  new window
2.李美穗(2011)。國小數學教師系統專業發展方案建構與實施。數學領域輔導團永續經營論文集:分享與傳承。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Brown, M.(2009)。The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials。Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
4.Kaput, J. J.(1991)。Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes。Radical constructivism in mathematics education。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
5.Lloyd, G. M.、Remillard, J. T.、Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A.(2009)。Teachers’ use of curriculum materials: An emerging field。Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction。New York:Routledge。  new window
6.Otte, M.(1986)。What is a text?。Perspectives on mathematics education: Papers submitted by members of the Bacomet group。Dordrecht, Netherlands:Reidel。  new window
7.Maturana, H. R.(1978)。Biology of language: The epistemology of reality。Psychology and biology of language and thought。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
8.Goodlad, J. I.(1979)。The scope of curriculum field。Curriculum Inquiry: the Study of Curriculum Practice。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE