:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師團隊合作文化的雙面向探討--以發展學校願景為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:孫敏芝 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Ming-chih
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁117-139
主題關鍵詞:教師團隊合作課程發展教師文化個案研究Teacher collaborationCurriculum developmentTeacher cultureCase study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:72
在近期教育政策鼓勵中小學自主發展學校課程的改革風潮之下,教師團隊成爲影響學校政策能否成功的關鍵因素。本研究以一所由教師共同發展彈性課程的國小爲個案,探究教師團隊在推動課程發展時,如何確立願景目標與分析學校情境。深度訪談蒐集資料約一學年,有以下重要發現:(一)教師合作文化的融合特質,使同事情誼及教師集體自主權更加鞏固,亦能產生團隊合作的積極效果,使教師更樂於分享。(二)教師合作過程涉及權力運作與實踐個人自主權,難免會在確立學校願景及學校情境之分析時,出現分歧觀點與不同作法;團隊中會因個人教育價值觀與信念之差異,出現不同權力核心,形成非正式影響力。(三)教師團隊合作設計彈性課程的過程中,建立真誠相待與不藏私的文化特質,能促使教師相互學習,加上團隊領導者的責任實踐與權力行使並進,能有效化解衝突。
Recently, the government of Taiwan has committed to pursuing a reform agenda for education which encourages schools to develop their own curricula. Teachers' collaboration in developing school curricula is seen as a key to successful curriculum reform. In this study, a primary-school teaching team that collaboratively planned free-time curriculum units for their age cohort was chosen. Data was collected by interviewing teachers about their decisions, understanding of school vision, and analyses and evaluation of school situations. Some important findings were obtained as follows: Firstly, team work was found to foster teachers' closeness and collective autonomy. If teams worked effectively in selecting and implementing rules of participation and labor partition, then positive outcomes were yielded. Secondly, both the use of power and the implementation of teacher autonomy existed in collaborative processes. There were differences and struggles among members in constructing schools visions and analyzing school situations. Various educational values and beliefs were found to create both legitimate and illegitimate power. Thirdly, teams with high levels of solidarity and trust among participants better facilitated teachers' learning from one another. Team leaders who demonstrated a sharpened sense of responsibility and use of power were able to resolve the conflict.
期刊論文
1.孫敏芝(20070400)。國民小學教師課程自主權的實踐與限制。課程與教學,10(2),65-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cameron, D. H.(2005)。Teachers working in collaborative structures: A case study of a secondary school in the USA。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,33(3),311-330。  new window
3.Leonard, L. J.、Leonard, P. E.(1999)。Reculturing for collaboration and leadership。The Journal of Educational Research,92(4),237-242。  new window
4.蔡清田(20010800)。實踐「學校本位課程發展」理念的專業行動。教育研究,88,24-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.O'Neil, J.(1995)。On schools as learning organizations: A conversation with Peter Senge。Educational Leadership,52(7),20-23。  new window
6.Scribner, J. P.、Sawyer, R. K.、Watson, S. T.、Myers, V. L.(2007)。Teacher Teams and Distributed Leadership: A Study of Group Discourse and Collaboration。Educational Administration Quarterly,43(1),67-100。  new window
7.簡紅珠(20050700)。對臺灣中小學教學文化的幾點思考。課程與教學,8(3),1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.簡紅珠(20070600)。教師專業發展與教學改善:借鏡日本小學教師的學課研究。教育研究,158,130-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳錫珍(2006)。教師團隊承諾 、 團隊合作與信任關係之研 究 (上 )。教育研究月刊,145,102-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Beattie, M.,、Thiessen, D.(1997)。School-based restructuring and curriculum change:teachers’and students’contrasting perspectives。The Curriculum Journal,8(3),411-440。  new window
11.Boucher, C., Smyth, A.,、Johnstone, M. J.(2004)。Creating collaborative spaces: The pleasures and perils of doing muti-disciplinary,multi-partner qualitative research。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,26(3),419-428。  new window
12.Christenson, M., Slutsky, R., Bendau, S., Covert, J., Dyer, J., Risko, G.,、Johnston, M.(2002)。The rocky road of teachers becoming action researchers。Teaching and Teacher Education,18(3),259-272。  new window
13.Dinnebeil, L. A., Hale, L. M.,、Rule, S.(1996)。A qualitative analysis of parents’ and service co-ordinators’ descriptions of variables that influence collaborative relationships。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,16,332-347。  new window
14.Eisner, E. W.(1967)。Educational objectives – help or hindrance?。School Review,75(3),250-260。  new window
15.Hawthorne, R. D.(1990)。Analyzing school-based collaborative curriculum decision making。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,5(3),279-286。  new window
16.Hickey, R.、Thompson, M. D.(2003)。Collaborative curriculum-making: The interplay of ownership and dialogue。Curriculum Perspectives,23(3),24-33。  new window
17.Marlow, M. P., Kyed, S.,、Connors, S.(2005)。Collegiality,collaboration and Kuleana: Complexity in a professional development school。Education,125(4),557-569。  new window
18.Park, S.,、Henkin, A. B.(2005)。Teacher team commitment,teamwork and trust:Exploring associations。Journal of Educational Administration,43(1),9-21。  new window
圖書
1.Alexander, R. J.(1984)。Primary teaching。Eastbourne, England:Holt, Rinehart & Wilson。  new window
2.Campbell, R. J.(1985)。Developing the primary school curriculum。London, UK:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
3.教育部(2000)。學校本位課程發展基本理念與實施策略。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Blasé, Joseph(1991)。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, California:Sage。  new window
5.陳千玉、E. H. Schein(2005)。組織文化與領導。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fullan, M.,、Hargreaves, A.(1991)。What’s worth fighting for:Working together for your school。Toronto。  new window
7.Hargreaves, A.(1991)。Contrived collegiality:The micropolitics of teacher collaboration。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park。  new window
8.Iannaccone, L.(1975)。Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators。Fort Lauderdale:Nova University。  new window
9.Langer, G., Colton, A.,、Goff, L.(2003)。Collaborative analysis of student work。Alexandria。  new window
10.Snell. M. E.,、Janney, R.(2005)。Collaborative teaming (2nd ed.)。Maryland。  new window
11.Wallace, M.(1999)。Combining cultural and political perspectives: The best of both conceptual worlds。Educational management redefining theory, policy, and practice。London。  new window
12.Wheelan, S. A.(2005)。Faculty groups。Thousand Oks。  new window
13.Zmuda, A., Kuklis, R.,、Kline, E.(2004)。Transforming schools。Alexandria。  new window
圖書論文
1.Blasé, J.(2005)。The micropolitics of educational change。Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE