:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討志工參與之深度休閒特質
書刊名:科技學刊. 人文社會類
作者:陳美芳
作者(外文):Chen, Mei-fang
出版日期:2012
卷期:21:1
頁次:頁63-75
主題關鍵詞:深度休閒志工參與無私的利他Serious leisureVolunteeringAltruistic
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:60
本研究目的在探討志工參與的深度休閒特質,以 Stebbins等人所提出的深度休閒理論為基礎,蒐集更細部的內容,做為將來設計量化問卷的參考。研究方法以深度訪談的質性研究作為途徑,根據志工參與過程的相關問題描述,以札記紀錄內容進行編碼、概念分類與表格歸納的方式進行資料的整理。經內容分析依其內涵歸納成七個向度,前六項特質是 Stebbins後期研究歸納出來的分類,但細部內容和理論的定義和描述有許多增列的主題。另外,就志工參與而言,無私的利他是有別於其他活動的深度休閒向度。後續研究方面可依訪談所歸納的主題與向度,編製適合志工參與的深度休閒量表。
Stebbins (1982) firstly revealed and indicated three types of serious leisure were defined as amateur activities, hobbyist pursuits and volunteering. Furthermore, Stebbins conceptualized serious leisure to six distinguishing qualities as perseverance, significant personal effort, a career course in the pursuit (progress and contingencies), identity with the pursuit, a unique ethos and the durable benefits (outcomes). The purpose of this research was based on the framework of serious leisure to discuss the distinguishing qualities which are possessed by different volunteering types in order for measuring questionnaires in the future. The quality method would be utilized in which included: depth individual interview in four types of volunteering, such as culture and recreation, community, social service, and religious. Personal background information, the behavior process of volunteering and description would be collected, coding, modified, varied and defined. The result shows there are seven dimensions, including durable benefits or outcomes, perseverance, unique ethos, leisure careers, identification with the pursuit, significant efforts, and being altruistic. Last dimension is the most important contribution in this study. The result may become basic framework of serious leisure inventory and measurement of volunteering in the future research.
期刊論文
1.李曉婷、陳美芬、蔡必焜(20110300)。志工休閒參與與心理健康關係之研究。運動與遊憩研究,5(3),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.趙芝良、林詩萍(20110700)。志工工作參與動機、組織承諾與認真性休閒特質關係之研究--以雲林縣義消隊為例。工作與休閒學刊,2(2),99-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Li, Y.、Ferraro, K. F.(2006)。Volunteering in Middle and Later Life: Is Health a Benefit, Barrier or Both?。Social Forces,85(1),497-519。  new window
4.Oman, D.、Thoresen, C. E.(1999)。Role of volunteering in health and happiness。Career Planning and Adult Development Journal,15(4),59-70。  new window
5.Parker, S.(1992)。Volunteering as leisure。Journal of Applied Recreation Research,17(1),1-11。  new window
6.Switzer, C. L.、Switzer, G. E.、Stukas, A. A.、Baker, C. E.(1999)。Medical student motivations to volunteer: Gender differences and comparisons to other volunteers。Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community,18(1/2),53-64。  new window
7.吳慧卿(20051200)。臺灣地區大學生運動志願服務工作參與動機及考量因素之研究。體育學報,38(4),93-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Jackson, S. A.(1996)。Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,67(1),76-90。  new window
9.Gould, J.、Moore, D. W.、McGuire, F.、Stebbins, R. A.(2008)。Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure。Journal of Leisure Research,40(1),47-68。  new window
10.Carlson, M.、Charlin, V.、Miller, N.(1988)。Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,55(2),211-229。  new window
11.Gould, D.、Eklund, R. C.、Jackson, S. A.(1992)。US Olympic wrestling excellence I™: Mental preparation, precompetitive cognition and affect。The Sport Psychologist,6,358-382。  new window
12.Piliavin, J. A.、Charng, H. W.(1990)。Altruism: a review of recent theory and research。Annual Review of Sociology,16,27-65。  new window
13.Stebbins, Robert A.(1982)。Serious leisure: A conceptual statement。Pacific Sociological Review,25(2),251-272。  new window
14.Stebbins, Robert A.(2001)。Serious leisure。Society,38(4),53-57。  new window
15.顏家芝、薛雅丹、黃文卿(20060300)。從深度休閒理論探討太魯閣國家公園解說志工對解說服務之投入程度與其深度休閒特質之關係。戶外遊憩研究,19(1),51-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Tsaur, S. H.、Liang, Y. W.(2008)。Serious leisure and recreation specialization。Leisure Sciences,30(4),325-341。  new window
17.周秀華、余嬪(20050600)。深度休閒者學習經驗之研究。教育與心理研究,28(2),297-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Cnaan, Ram A.、Handy, Femida、Wadsworth, Margaret(1996)。Defining Who Is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,25(3),364-383。  new window
學位論文
1.廖文琴(2010)。學校志工認真休閒特質與休閒效益之關係(碩士論文)。亞洲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳幸梅(2005)。成人參與服務學習動機及學習成效之研究--以印度垂死之家台灣志工為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gould, J. M.(2005)。The development of the serious leisure inventory and measure(博士論文)。University of Clemson,South Carolina。  new window
4.顏伽如(2003)。認真休閒之參與歷程與相關因素之研究--以臺北市立圖書館「林老師說故事」之志工為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stebbins, R. A.、Grahaw, M.(2004)。Volunteering as leisure/leisure as volunteering: An international assessment。Cambridge, MA:CABI publishing。  new window
2.Bammel, G.、Burrus-Bammel, Lei Lane(1982)。Leisure and human behavior。Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers。  new window
3.Stebbins, Robert A.(1992)。Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure。McGill-Queen's University Press。  new window
4.Seligman, M. E. P.、洪蘭(2003)。真實的快樂。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、張芬芬(2005)。質性研究資料分析。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE