既有研究雖對全球他新自由主義與在地發展脈絡之交互影響怪有所討論，但並未進一步探究此種互動性如何具體反應在建成環境，進而改變城市地景與市民公共空間經驗。本文比較士林夜市與建成圓環更新個案，探討新自由主義都市治理政策影響本土消費地景之過程，研究方法為歷史檔案分析、行為調查與深度訪談，分析發現兩夜市受新自由主義影響出現不同攤商治理模式－士林夜市以攤商自主經營管理為主，市場處監督為輔，接軌市場機制，鼓勵擺攤業自由競爭，繼而延續夜市經濟：圓環則完全改由企業獲自由經營權，排除攤商，繼而將小吃業完全置換:兩種治理模式對實質環境景觀，乃透過土地使用方式、都市設計型態與環境行為三層面發生作用，使兩個案更新後消費地景分別產生形式混雜與地理移轉現象，此研究揭示新自由主義在地實踐之相異模式，及對本土消費地景產生之不同轉型結果，結論並建議公部門、建築師與都市規劃者應據以反思之課題。

Theories suggest that Neoliberalism is path-dependent, embedded in local contexts and regional urban governance systems. Drawing upon the case studies of Shilin Night Market and Jiangcheng Circle, this paper examines the ways in which the power of neoliberal urban governance reshapes local consumption landscapes. Research methods include archival research, behavioral analyses, and in-depth interview with key informants. Research identify the contemporary changes in terms of land uses, urban design, and environment behaviors within and around two research settings as the catalysts of urban landscapes transformation. Both the public-private partnership in Shilin Night Market and the private investor of Jiangcheng Circle negotiate with neoliberal logic to renew spaces. Ultimately, the former has become an aesthetically and culturally hybrid district. The latter has taken shape in a modern symbol, while displacing original market users elsewhere. Conclusions are discussion of critical issues concerning architects, urban planners and city officials.