臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：綠色堡壘：臺北新圓環之綠活論述、自然再現與偽公共空間
書刊名：建築學報
作者：邱啟新
作者(外文)：Chiu, Chi-hsin
出版日期：2015
卷期：91
頁次：頁99-118
主題關鍵詞：都市再生；自然再現；公私合夥；偽公共空間；Urban redevelopment；Representation of nature；Public-private partnership；Pseudo-public space
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:125
  • 點閱點閱:115
建成圓環改建緣起於市場現代化政策，受台北市都市發展影響，納入新自由主義治理範疇，採綠活導向之ROT模式，重新定位場所機能與再生地方意象。本文分析該模式之歷史意義與市民使用經驗，研究方法為歷史分析、行為地圖調查、半結構訪談，透過政治生態學理論，探討自然在圓環更新案之意義轉變。第一部份探討圓環歷史之自然形式變遷，以2000年初台北車站特定區規劃採用之綠活論述與圓環最初之綠地構想，作為2007年民營化後綠活設計之對照點；第二部分評估市民使用空間之經驗，以定位2012年後自然在新圓環之角色。研究發現圓環從初期綠地構想、綠色消費，至現階段之複合展館，自然元素從實質自然，轉變至社會自然，最終成符號化之第三自然；民眾隨之產生高級化與現代感、神秘感與領域性、排外性與壓迫感三大面向感受。隨圓環之自然層級改變，場所公共性逐漸降低，本文發展出「綠色堡壘」概念界定挪用綠活意象之「偽公共空間」（pseudo-public space）與都市再生策略，雖創造高品味意象，卻缺乏活動包容性與空間友善性，犧牲場所可提供之公共生活，長期終難以真正活絡地區。結論反思自然元素在建築設計中角色，且建議政府、專業者與民眾可改善前述問題之作法。
Beyond a modernized marketplace, Jiangcheng Circle in Taipei has become an object of the city's neoliberal urban governance since the early 2000s. Holding a ROT contract with the Municipality, a company remodels the building into a facility symbolic of green lifestyle by taking major influence from the ＂nature＂. This paper examines the historical significance of its green-life oriented redevelopment, while evaluating users' experiences. Research methods include historical analysis, behavior mapping and semi-structured interviews. The analyses employ a framework of political ecology to uncover the implications of the redevelopment. The first part reviews the changing forms of nature, contrasting the post-privatization period with the early 2000s when green-life inspired planning discourses first emerged. The second part evaluates users' experiences to clarify the roles of nature after 2012. The paper considers the city's original plan of green space as well as the investor's green-consumption business as the Second Nature, while identifying the latest uses of landscape design and horticulture as the Third Nature. As the level of nature changes, Jiangcheng Circle becomes an exclusive environment. Users perceive it as a place characterized by such images as ＂modern and high-end ＂, ＂mysterious and territorial＂, ＂exclusive and confined＂. The paper develops the concept of ＂Green Fortress＂ to theorize a new type of ＂pseudo-public space＂. A ＂Green Fortress＂ may temporarily catalyze property development with enhanced images, while failing to revive a neighborhood in the long run. The conclusions rethink the significance of nature embodied in architectural design, suggesting solutions for public officials and design professionals.
期刊論文
1.Chiu, Chihsin(2013)。Informal management, interactive performance: Street vendors and police in a Taipei Night Market。International Development Planning Review，35(4)，335-352。  new window
2.江尚書、周素卿、吳幸玲(20100600)。都市再發展與新自由主義治理的經驗模式：以臺北車站特定專區之開發為例。都市與計劃，37(2)，167-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李尚叡、高嘉濃、林建華、蘇重威、鹿島大睦(20070200)。臺北車站特定專用區歷史發展新契機--C1/D1聯合開發大樓與機場捷運臺北站之興建。捷運技術，36，117-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.薛德升、黃耿志(2008)。管制之外的“管制”：城中村非正規部門的空間集聚與生存狀態--以廣州市下渡村為例。地理研究，27(6)，1390-1399。  延伸查詢new window
5.Yeo, S. J.、Hee, L.、Heng, C. K.(2012)。Urban informality and everyday (night)life: A field study in Singapore。International Development Planning Review，34(4)，369-390。  new window
6.Wark, M.(1994)。Third nature。Cultural Studies，8，115-132。  new window
7.郭中端、掘巵憲二、卞鳳奎(19941200)。從圓環小吃話圓環今昔。臺北文獻，110，145-153。  延伸查詢new window
8.戴伯芬(19940700)。誰做攤販？--臺灣攤販的歷史形構。臺灣社會研究季刊，17，121-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Harvey, D.(1989)。From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: the Transformation in Urban Goverance in Late Capitalism。Geografiska Annaler: Series B: Human Geography，71(1)，3-17。  new window
10.Escohar, Arturo(1998)。Whose knowledge whose nature: Biodiversity, conservation and the Political Ecology of social movements。Journal of Political Ecology，5，53-82。  new window
11.Brenner, Neil、Theodore, Nik(2002)。Cities and the Geographies of "Actually Existing Neoliberalism"。Antipode，34(3)，349-379。  new window
學位論文
1.江宗霖(2004)。歷史性場所的地景變遷與空間再結構過程--台北市西門市場更新再利用案(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張晉維(2010)。建成圓環的生與死--地方政治與都市設計中的地方(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁瑋倩(2008)。公民參與落差之研究：以建成圓環為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳盈秀(2012)。城市在漂綠--從台北好好看系列二政策看當代都市自然的社會建構(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳鵬宇(2009)。綠活的想像與實踐：台北地區的園藝消費與居家自然(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃鈞毅(2009)。地方治理與都市再生：台北市建成圓環的網絡分析(碩士論文)。中華大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.Baker, T.(2011)。The Garden on the Machine: Landscapes of the Neo-pastoral and Urban Pastoral on the High Line, New York City(碩士論文)。University College London，London, UK。  new window
8.王東奎(1989)。台北市建成圓環之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.張文怡(2005)。建成圓環再生案之省思研究--馬仔現象的產生與應有對策(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.Yu, S. D.(1995)。Meaning, Disorder and the Political Economy of Night Markets in Taiwan(博士論文)。University of California，CA, USA。  new window
圖書
1.Zukin, Sharon(1982)。Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change。New York：Rutgers University Press。  new window
2.Braun, B.、Castree, N.(1998)。Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
3.Smith, N.(1984)。Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space。GA, USA：University of Georgia Press。  new window
4.Smart, A.、Smart, J.(2005)。Petty Capitalists and Globalization: Flexibility, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
5.Zukin, S.(2009)。Naked City。London, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Bromley, Ray、Gerry, Chris(1979)。Casual Work and Poverty in Third World Cities。NY, USA：John Wiley & Sons, Ltd。  new window
7.Mitchell, Don(2003)。The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space。Guilford Press。  new window
8.Ong, Aihwa(2006)。Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty。Duke University Press。  new window
9.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.吳英明(1996)。公私部門協力關係之研究：兼論公私部門聯合開發與都市發展。高雄：復文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Zukin, Sharon(1995)。The Cultures of Cities。Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.行政院環保署(2012)。綠色生活及消費指引，http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/GreenLife， 2014/01/30。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳曼寧(20111102)。建成圓環轉型再出發，改賣有機蔬果。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭安家(20120204)。日本「花鳥園」餐飲集團將進駐圓環。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊正海(20111104)。台北圓環變身將賣鮮蔬好樂活引進「農夫市場」模式。  延伸查詢new window
5.Smith, N.(2009)。Nature as accumulation strategy，http://neil-smith.net。  new window
圖書論文
1.Boyer, M. C.(1992)。Cities for sale: Merchandising history at South Street Seaport。Variation on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space。NY, USA：Hill and Wang。  new window
2.Katz, C.(1998)。Whose nature, whose culture? Private productions of space and the "preservation" of nature。Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
3.McGee, T. G.(1985)。Conservation-persistence in the two-circuit system of Hong Kong: A case study of hawkers。Theaters of Accumulation。NY, USA：Methuen & Co.。  new window
4.Yu, Shuenn-Der(2004)。Hot and noisy: Taiwan's night market culture。The Minor Arts of Daily Life: Popular Culture in Taiwan。Honolulu：University of Hawaii Press。  new window
5.Castells, Manuel、Portes, Alejandro(1989)。World Underneath: The origins, dynamics and effects of the Informal Economy。The Informal Economy: Studies in Adavnced and Less Developed Countries。Baltimore, MD：John Hopkins University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：690（臺灣：652，外國：38） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67149095
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上