資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.141.8.247)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
A Study on Preservice Teachers' Learning and Their Beliefs about Learning in an Introductory Educational Psychology Course
書刊名:
全人教育學報
作者:
江美姿
作者(外文):
Chiang, Mei-tzu
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
12
頁次:
頁63-92
主題關鍵詞:
職前教師之學習
;
學習理論
;
職前教師的信念
;
教育心理學課程
;
教學信念
;
Preservice teacher's learning
;
Learning theory course
;
Preservice teachers' beliefs
;
Educational psychology course
;
Beliefs about learning
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:20
本研究目的為探究職前教師在教育心理學概論中學習的教育理論,對他們在教學信念之影響。本研究採用質性及量化並重的研究方法,探討關於職前教師的學習經驗對其教學信念之影響。研究結果顯示,職前教師從學期開始到結束,對於建構主義的認同最強,認知理論次之,而對於行為主義的信念最弱;換言之,職前教師的現有信念傾向以學生學習為主體,並非以教師為中心的信念。改變職前教師的學習信念需要一些外在的催化力量,然而,此門課程的授課教師並未提供。職前教師的現有信念在這門課程的學習過程中持續加強,因為教師於此門課程中並未提供對於建構主義理論的質疑或批判論點,亦無提供其他理論的優點。最後,本研究提供兩項可作為教育策略之應用:(一)如何有效的教授教育心理學課程及(二)如何從這門課程和研究中學習。
以文找文
The purpose of this study was to examine how preservice teachers' learning about learning theories influences their beliefs about learning within the context of an introductory educational psychology course. This study used both quantitative and qualitative research methods to investigate preservice teachers' learning experiences and beliefs about learning. As the findings indicate, preservice teachers had stronger beliefs in constructivism, less strong beliefs in cognitive theory, and the least strong beliefs in behaviorism from the beginning to the end of the semester. In other words, their existing beliefs were more oriented toward a learner-centered versus a teacher-centered perspective. Change in preservice teachers' beliefs about learning requires a catalyst, and this catalyst was not provided by the instructor. These existing beliefs were being reinforced throughout the course because the instructor did not provide any critical examination or questioning of constructivist theory nor provide other obvious benefits to other theories. In the end, this research offers two implications for (a) teaching an effective educational psychology course and (b) learning from this course and research.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Agee, J.(1998)。Negotiating different conceptions about reading and teaching literature in a preservice literature class。Research in the Teaching of English,33,85-124。
2.
Anderson, D.、Piazza, J.(1996)。Changing beliefs: Teaching and learning in mathematics in constructivist pre-service classrooms。Action in Teacher Education,18(2),51-62。
3.
Lin, H. L.、Gorrell, J.(2002)。The road to preservice teachers' conceptual change。Educational Research Quarterly,26(2),54-65。
4.
Foss, D.、Kleinsasser, R.(1996)。Preservice elementary teachers' views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge。Teaching and Teacher Education,12(4),429-442。
5.
Mclnerney, D. M.(2005)。Educational psychology-theory, research and teaching: A 25-year retrospective。Educational Psychology,25(6),585-599。
6.
Morrell, P.(2003)。An extended examination of preservice elementary teachers' science teaching self-efficacy。School Science and Mathematics,103,246-251。
7.
Sternberg, R. J.(1996)。Educational psychology has fallen, but it can get up。Educational Psychology Review,8(2),175-185。
8.
Lee, O.(2004)。Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,65-93。
9.
Yost, Deborah S.、Sentner, Sally M.、Forlenza-Bailey, Anna(2000)。An Examination of the Construct of Critical Reflection: Implications for Teacher Education Programming in the 21st Century。Journal of Teacher Education,51(1),39-49。
10.
Stuart, C.、Thurlow, D.(2000)。Making it their own: Preservice teachers' experiences, beliefsm and classroom practices。Journal of Teacher Education,51(2),113-121。
11.
Windschitl, Mark(2002)。Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: A analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers。Review of Educational Research,72(2),131-175。
12.
Hollingsworth, Sandra(1989)。Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach。American Educational Research Journal,26(2),160-189。
13.
Pajares, M. F.(1992)。Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct。Review of Educational Research,62(3),307-332。
14.
Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review,84(2),191-215。
15.
Cobb, P.、Bowers, J.(1999)。Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice。Educational Researcher,28(2),4-15。
學位論文
1.
Rigisich, L. M.(2004)。Visions of learning-theory application: Minds meeting deeds in the classroom(博士論文)。Columbia University,New York。
圖書
1.
Aulls, M. W.、Shore, B. M.(2008)。Inquiry in education: The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative。New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
2.
Fosnot, C. T.、Fosnot, T. W.(2005)。Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice。NY. Teachers College Press。
3.
Woolfolk Hoy, A.(2009)。Educational psychology。Boston:Pearson Education Inc.:Allyn and Bacon。
圖書論文
1.
Cobb, P.、Wood, T.、Yackel, E.(1990)。Classroom as learning environments for teachers and researchers。Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。
2.
Franke, M. L.、Fennema, E.、Carpenter, T.(1997)。Teachers creating change: Examining evolving beliefs and classroom practice。Mathematics teachers in transition。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。
3.
Murphy, P. K.、Mason, L.(2006)。Changing knowledge and beliefs。Handbook of Educational Psychology。New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
4.
Woolfolk-Hoy, A.、Davis, H.、Pape, S. J.(2006)。Teacher knowledge and beliefs。Handbook of educational psychology。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
5.
Clark, R. E.(2009)。How much and what type of guidance is optimal for learning from instruction?。Constructivist Instruction: success or failure?。New York:Routledge。
6.
Kintsch, W.(2009)。Learning and constructivism。Constructivist Instruction: Success or failure?。New York:Routledge。
7.
Mayer, R. E.(2009)。Constructivism as a theory of learning versus constructivism as a prescription for instruction。Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?。New York:Routledge。
8.
Tobias, S.(2009)。An eclectic appraisal of the success or failure of constructivist instruction。Constructivist Instruction: Success or failure?。New York:Routledge。
9.
Richardson, V.(2003)。Preservice teachers' beliefs。Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education。Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing。
10.
Richardson, V.(1996)。The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach。Handbook of research on teacher education。New York:Macmillan。
11.
Calderhead, J.(1996)。Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge。Handbook of educational psychology。New York, NK:Simon & Schuster Macmillan。
12.
Thompson, A. G.(1992)。Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。New York, NY:Macmillan。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
全人教育在資訊網路素養培養之實務探討
2.
道教生命教育內涵與環境倫理思想研究
3.
融入21世紀就業技能的通識教育--以科學素養為例
4.
J. Macmurray與F. Kirkpatrick形上學統整社區模式理論探討及其在教育上的運用
5.
合作學習法的教案設計與教師角色定位--以大學國文課程為例
6.
以《易經》為例論通識教育中的傳統經典閱讀策略
7.
倫理教育寓於通識國文的教學實施檢討
8.
立體的熱誠禱詞--論張秀亞詩中的宗教情懷
9.
初探靈性教育理念融入天主教高等教育課程與教學的價值
10.
學職契合觀轉向學職連結觀:以「文化心理學與實踐」學程實踐為例
11.
「輔仁大學國文課程推動與革新計畫」之個人教學實踐與分析--試以100學年度上學期「大一國文」課程為例
12.
「真實與假象」課程執行策略之實務操作--以全校性閱讀書寫課程推動與革新計畫為例
13.
理解、詮釋、應用的合一--多元議題融入國文課程示例及其展開
14.
文本分析的歷史教育--以「經典研讀:梁啟超《新民說》」課程之實踐為例
15.
從「專業倫理」課程彰顯「人性尊嚴」進路的反省
QR Code